Objective: To demonstrate the changes in posterior corneal curvature after femtosecond laser LASIK with different corneal hysteresis (CH) measurements in high myopia. Methods: This was a prospective study. One hundred and three patients (206 eyes) were collected from January 2014 to January 2015 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, and were divided into two groups according to CH: group A (CH<9.6) and group B (CH>9.6). The changes in posterior corneal curvature were obtained by an analysis at pre-operation and postoperative 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. Data were analyzed with t-test and repeated measure ANOVA. Results: One hundred patients (200 eyes) finished the study at last. There were 54 patients in group A and 46 patients in group B. The posterior corneal curvatures of group A at postoperative 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months were 6.37±0.09 D, 6.44±0.09 D,6.43±0.09 D, and 6.43±0.09 D, respectively. The differences were statistically significant between pre-operation and the different postoperative times (F=104.11, P<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between 1 month and 3 months (P<0.05), but no significant differences between 3 and 6 months or 6 and 12 months. The posterior corneal curvatures of group B at postoperative 1, 3, 6 and 12 months were 6.29±0.08 D, 6.36±0.09 D, 6.37±0.09 D, and 6.37±0.09 D, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between pre-operation and all of the different postoperative times (F=138.05,P<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between 1 month and 3 months (P<0.05), but no significant difference between 3 months and 6 months or 6 and 12 months. There were statistically significant differences between group A and group B after surgery in the values of posterior corneal curvature at different time points (t=4.78, 4.39, 3.56, 3.17, P<0.05). Conclusions: Presurgical corneal hysteresis influences the effect of femtosecond laser LASIK on posterior corneal curvature. CH can be set as the index to clinically evaluate the safety of femtosecond laser LASIK.
杨帆,张红,黄磊,康杨,吴琼,杜春宇,胡琦. 角膜阻滞量对高度近视飞秒激光LASIK术后角膜后表面曲率的影响[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2018, 20(12): 708-712.
Fan Yang,Hong Zhang,Lei Huang,Yang Kang,Qiong Wu,Chunyu Du,Qi Hu. the Effects of Corneal Hysteresis on Posterior Corneal Curvature after Femtosecond Laser LAsIK in High Myopia. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2018, 20(12): 708-712. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2018.12.002
Tomita M, Inoue N, Tsuru T. Treatment of keratoectasia after LASIK by intrastromal corneal ring segments in two patients who had no preoperative risk factors. Clin Ophthalmol, 2010, 4:785-791.
Lim L, Gazzard G, Chan YH, et al. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008, 49(9):
Seiler T, Koufala K, Richter G. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg, 1998, 14(3): 312-317.
[3]
Jain R, Dilraj G, Grewal SP. Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2007, 55(5): 341-347. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.33819.
[4]
Uzbek AK, Kamburo?lu G, Mahmoud AM, et al. Change in biomechanical parameters after flap creation using the Intralase femtosecond laser and subsequent excimer laser ablation. Curr Eye Res, 2011, 36(7): 614-619. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2010.546952.
[5]
Wang Z, Chen J, Yang B. Posterior corneal surface topographic changes after laser in situ keratomileusis are related to residual corneal bed thickness. Ophthalmology, 1999, 106(2): 406-409;discussion 409-410. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90083-0.
[10]
Randleman JB, Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, et al. Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas:implications for refractive surgery. J Refract Surg, 2008, 24(1):S85-S89.
Philipp WE, Speicher L, Göttinger W. Histological and immunohistochemical findings after laser in situ keratomileusis in human corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29(4): 808-820. DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01611-5.
[14]
Wang JK, Huang TL, Su PY, et al. Factors Affecting Corneal Hysteresis in Taiwanese Adults. 眼科学报, 2015, 30(3): 89-93.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4432.2015.03.001.
[15]
Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg,2005, 31(1): 156-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044.
[16]
Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol, 2006, 142(6): 990-992. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.058.
Verkicharla PK, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Current and predicted demographics of high myopia and an update of its associated pathological changes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2015,35(5): 465-475. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12238.
[6]
Guirao A. Theoretical elastic response of the cornea to refractive surgery: risk factors for keratectasia. J Refract Surg, 2005,21(2): 176-185.
[18]
Lim L, Gazzard G, Chan YH, et al. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008, 49(9):
Verkicharla PK, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Current and predicted demographics of high myopia and an update of its associated pathological changes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2015,35(5): 465-475. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12238.
[7]
Kim TH, Lee D, Lee HI. The safety of 250 microm residual stromal bed in preventing keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). J Korean Med Sci, 2007, 22(1): 142-
14
5. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.1.142.
[8]
Tomita M, Inoue N, Tsuru T. Treatment of keratoectasia after LASIK by intrastromal corneal ring segments in two patients who had no preoperative risk factors. Clin Ophthalmol, 2010, 4:785-791.
Philipp WE, Speicher L, Göttinger W. Histological and immunohistochemical findings after laser in situ keratomileusis in human corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29(4): 808-820. DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01611-5.
[14]
Wang JK, Huang TL, Su PY, et al. Factors Affecting Corneal Hysteresis in Taiwanese Adults. 眼科学报, 2015, 30(3): 89-93.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4432.2015.03.001.
[15]
Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg,2005, 31(1): 156-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044.
[16]
Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol, 2006, 142(6): 990-992. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.058.
Lim L, Gazzard G, Chan YH, et al. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008, 49(9):
Verkicharla PK, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Current and predicted demographics of high myopia and an update of its associated pathological changes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2015,35(5): 465-475. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12238.
浙公网安备 33030202001892号