扫描信号强度对OCTA测量正常人黄斑浅层血流的影响

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210107-00006

摘要
图/表
参考文献(27)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF 2151KB HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

文章导读

摘要目的：研究扫描信号强度（SS）对光学相干断层扫描血管成像（OCTA）测量正常人黄斑浅层血流密度的影响。方法：系列病例研究。对2020年9─12月在北京同仁医院进行健康体检的某事业单位在职职工进行系统眼科检查，应用光学相干断层扫描（OCT）和OCTA测量平均黄斑节细胞内丛状层（mGCIPL）厚度和黄斑6 mm×6 mm浅层血流密度。提取血流密度（VD）、灌注密度（PD）和黄斑中心凹无血管区（FAZ）等参数。纳入SS为8、9、10的患者，并分为SS8组、SS9组和SS10组。取右眼数据用于统计学分析。采用方差分析和非参数检验分析比较3组间VD、PD和FAZ参数之间的差别。采用 Spearman检验分析黄斑VD和PD之间的相关关系。采用多元线性回归分析SS、年龄、性别、等效球镜度（SE）以及mGCIPL厚度对黄斑浅层血流的影响。结果：75例（75眼）健康人纳入研究，其中SS8 组20眼，SS9组20眼，SS10组35眼。黄斑总体VD在SS8、SS9和SS10之间差异有统计学意义（Hc=19.86， P<0.001）。黄斑总体PD在SS8、SS9和SS10之间差异有统计学意义（Hc=25.51，P<0.001）。3组间FAZ 参数差异无统计学意义。Spearman分析显示黄斑总体VD和总体PD呈正相关（r=0.978，P<0.001）。多元线性回归分析显示平均mGCIPL厚度值每减少1 μm，总体VD减少0.05 mm-1，总体PD减少0.002； SS每减少1个单位，总体VD减少0.55 mm-1，总体PD减少0.02。年龄、性别和SE对VD和PD无影响。结论：在SS为8以上的扫描中，正常人黄斑FAZ血流参数无明显差别，但是在黄斑VD和PD不同信号强度存在明显差异。在解读旁中心凹区域血流参数时需要考虑信号强度差别带来的影响。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ： , 光学相干断层扫描血管成像, 信号强度, 黄斑血管密度

Abstract： Objective: To report the effects of signal strength (SS) on the normal macular microvascular density acquired from optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods: This was a case series study. Normal subjects (right eyes) were recruited from September 2020 to December 2020 in the Beijing Tongren Hospital. All subjects underwent 6 mm×6 mm high-definition (HD)-OCT/OCTA. Macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness and macular microvascular density were analyzed using the Cirrus OCTA system (Angio Plexversion 10.0). Subjects were grouped according to the signal strength (SS) (8, 9, 10): SS8, SS9 and SS10. Vessel density (VD), perfusion density (PD) and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters of the superficial capillary plexus were calculated. One-way analysis of variance and a nonparametric test were conducted to compare macular VD, PD and FAZ among the three groups. Spearman correlation was used to determine the relationship between macular VD and PD. Multiple regression analysis determined the association between macular vascular parameters and SS, age, gender, spherical equivalent (SE) and mGCIPL thickness. Results: Seventy-five subjects (75 eyes) were included. SS8 group was 20 eyes, SS9 group was 20 eyes and SS10 group was 35 eyes. There were significant differences between SS8, SS9 and SS10 (Hc=19.86, P<0.001). There were significant differences between the SS8, SS9 and SS10 groups in the total area of the macular PD (Hc=25.51, P<0.001). There were no significant differences among the three groups in FAZ parameters. The Spearman test showed that the total area of VD was significantly correlated with PD (r=0.978, P<0.001). The total area of VD was associated with mGCIPL and SS; the total area of PD was associated with mGCIPL and SS. Both VD and PD were not associated with age, gender or SE. Conclusions: In normal subjects, macular VD and PD show significant differences in different SS groups, but the FAZ parameters show no significant differences among the SS groups above 8. This may suggest the impact of SS should be considered carefully when interpreting perifoveal vessel parameters.

Key words： optical coherence tomography angiography signal strength macular microvascular density

收稿日期: 2021-01-07

PACS:

基金资助: 北京市属医院科研培育计划（PX2020010）

通讯作者: 王宁利（ORCID：0000-0002-8933-4482），Email：wningli@vip.163.com

引用本文:

霍妍佼郭彦张微李蕾王宁利. 扫描信号强度对OCTA测量正常人黄斑浅层血流的影响[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2021, 23(7): 515-521. Yanjiao Huo, Yan Guo, Wei Zhang, Lei Li, Ningli Wang. Effect of Signal Strength in the Analysis of Normal Macular Microvascular Density Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2021, 23(7): 515-521. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210107-00006

链接本文:

https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210107-00006 或 https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/Y2021/V23/I7/515

[1]	Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: A review. JAMA, 2014, 311(18): 1901- 1911. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.3192.
[2]	The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS investigators. Am J Ophthalmol, 2000, 130(4): 429-440. DOI: 10.1016/s0002- 9394(00)00538-9.
[3]	Grunwald JE, Piltz J, Hariprasad SM, et al. Optic nerve and choroidal circulation in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,1998, 39(12): 2329-2336.
[4]	Galassi F, Sodi A, Ucci F, et al. Ocular hemodynamics and glaucoma prognosis: a color Doppler imaging study. Arch Ophthalmol, 2003, 121(12): 1711-1715. DOI: 10.1001/ archopht.121.12.1711.
[5]	Lei J, Durbin MK, Shi Y, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of superficial macular retinal vessel density measurements using optical coherence tomography angiography en face images. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2017, 135(10): 1092-1098. DOI: 10.1001/ jamaophthalmol.2017.3431.
[6]	Quaranta-EI Maftouhi M, EI Maftouhi A, Eandi CM. Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy imaged by optical coherencetomographic angiography. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015, 160(3): 581-587. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.06.016.
[7]	Jia Y, Bailey ST, Wilson DJ, et al. Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of choroidal neovascularization in agerelated macular degeneration. Ophthalmology, 2014, 121(7): 1435-1444. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.034.
[8]	Ishibazawa A, Nagaoka T, Takahashi A, et al. Optical coherencetomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy: A prospectivepilot study. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015, 160(1): 35-44. e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.04.021.
[9]	Wang X, Jiang C, Ko T, et al. Correlation between optic disc perfusion and glaucomatous severity in patients with open-angle glaucoma: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2015, 253(9): 1557-1564. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-3095-y.
[10]	Yarmohammadi A, Zangwill LM, Diniz-Filho A, et al. Relationship between optical coherence tomography angiography vessel density and severity of visual field loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology, 2016, 123(12): 2498-508. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ophtha.2016.08.041.
[11]	Chen HS, Liu CH, Wu WC, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of the superficial microvasculature in the macular and peripapillary areas in glaucomatous and healthy eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2017, 58(9): 3637-3645. DOI: 10.1167/ iovs.17-21846.
[12]	Brücher VC, Storp JJ, Eter N, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography-derived flow density: A review of the influencing factors. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2020, 258(4): 701- 710. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04553-2.
[13]	Lim HB, Kim YW, Nam KY, et al. Signal strength as an important factor in the analysis of peripapillary microvascular density using optical coherence tomography angiography. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 16299. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52818-x.
[14]	Yu JJ, Camino A, Liu L, et al. Signal strength reduction effects in OCT angiography. Ophthalmol Retina, 2019, 3(10): 835-842. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.04.029.
[15]	You QS, Chan J, Ng A, et al. Macular vessel density measured with optical coherence tomography angiography and its associations in a large population-based study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2019, 60(14): 4830-4837. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.19-28137.
[16]	American academy of ophthalmology. Basic and clinical science course. Italy: FSC, 2014: 46-47.
[17]	Rosenfeld PJ, Durbin MK, Roisman L, et al. ZEISS Angioplex™ Spectral domain optical coherence tomography angiography: technical aspects. Dev Ophthalmol, 2016, 56: 18-29. DOI: 10.1159/000442773.
[18]	Richter GM, Madi I, Chu Z, et al. Structural and functional associations of macular microcirculation in the ganglion cellinner plexiform layer in glaucoma using optical coherence tomography angiography. J Glaucoma, 2018, 27(3): 281-290. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000888.
[19]	Shoji T, Zangwill LM, Akagi T, et al. Progressive macula vessel density loss in primary open-angle glaucoma: Alongitudinalstudy. Am J Ophthalmol, 2017, 182: 107-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017. 07.011.
[20]	Kwon J, Choi J, Shin JW, et al. Alterations of the foveal avascular zone measured by optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma patients with central visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2017, 58(3): 1637-1645. DOI: 10.1167/ iovs.16-21079.
[21]	Park SH, Cho H, Hwang SJ, et al. Changes in the retinal microvasculature measured using optical coherence tomography angiography according to age. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(3): 883. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030883.
[22]	Yu J, Gu R, Zong Y, et al. Relationship between retinal perfusion and retinal thickness in healthy subjects: An optical coherence tomography angiography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2016, 57(9): 204-210. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18630.
[23]	Zhang Z, Huang X, Meng X, et al. In vivo assessment of macular in eyes of healthy children 8 to 16 years old using optical coherence tomography angiography. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 8936. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08174-9.
[24]	Coscas F, Sellam A, Glacet-Bernard A, et al. Normative data for vascular density in superficial and deep capillary plexuses of healthy adults assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci, 2016, 57(9): 211-223. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18793.
[25]	Rao HL, Pradhan ZS, Weinreb RN, et al. Determinants of peripapillary and macular vessel densities measured by optical coherence tomography angiography in normal eyes. J Glaucoma, 2017, 26(5): 491-497. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000655.
[26]	Lim HB, Lee MW, Park JH, et al. Changes in ganglion cellinner plexiform layer thickness and retinal microvasculature in hypertension: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Am J Ophthalmol, 2019, 199(13): 167-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.11.016.
[27]	Köse HC, Tekeli O. Optical coherence tomography angiography of the peripapillary region and macula in normal, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and ocular hypertension eyes. Int J Ophthalmol, 2020, 13(5): 744-754. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2020.05.08.