Objective To verify the accuracy of the results of special visual measurement instruments for heterphoric testing. Methods In this cross-sectional study, fifty healthy students served as subjects. The degree of heterphoria was measured by a special visual measurement instrument, the Maddox rod and a synoptophore. A one-way ANOVA and paired t test were used to calculate the data. Results ①The Maddox rod and synoptophore measured the highest amounts of esophoria, accounting for 38% and 34%; hyperphoria was the least, accounting for 2% and 4%. Measurements with the special visual measurement instrument found the highest amounts of esophoria plus hyperphoria, accounting for 36%; orthophoria was found the least, accounting for 4%. ②Esophoria values measured in order from the most to the least were the Maddox rod, measurement instrument and synoptophore (F=3.18, P<0.05). There was a significant difference between the Maddox rod and synoptophore (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the Maddox rod and measurement instrument and the measurement instrument and the synoptophore (P>0.05). Exophoria values measured from high to low were the Maddox, synoptophore and inspection instrument. There were no significant differences among the three methods (F=0.83, P>0.05). Hyperphoria values measured from high to low were the measurement instrument, Maddox rod and synoptophore (F=6.34, P<0.05). There were significant differences between the measurement instrument and synoptophore and the Maddox rod and synoptophore (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the measurement instrument and Maddox rod (P>0.05). ③The dominant eye′s value was higher than the nondominant eye′s in esophoria, exophoria and hyperphoria, but only the Maddox rod measured a significant difference in esophoria (t=2.74, P<0.01). Conclusion There were differences in the degree of heterphoria measured by the three instruments, but there was no significant difference between the measurement instrument and Maddox rod.
杨国庆,陶冶,王小成,张磊,张作明. 隐斜视三种检查方法的比较[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2013, 15(8): 493-495.
ANG Guo-qing,TAO Ye, WANG Xiao-cheng,ZHANG Lei, ZHANG Zuo-ming. Comparison of three instruments for heterophoric testing. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2013, 15(8): 493-495. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2013.08.011