Pentacam三维眼前节分析诊断系统 与Keratron Scout角膜像差仪测量 Kappa角的比较

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.11.005

摘要
图/表
参考文献(19)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF 707KB HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

目的：比较Pentacam三维眼前节分析诊断系统与Keratron Scout角膜像差仪测量屈光手术患者Kappa 角大小的差异。方法：系列病例研究。选取空军军医大学西京医院眼科屈光矫正中心术前筛查患者98例（196眼）。在同一环境下进行Pentacam与Keratron Scout检查，记录2种检查方式的瞳孔直径、 Kappa角大小（采用直角坐标系表示），从而获得Kappa角在角膜的x轴和y轴偏移量，比较2种检查方法测量的Kappa角大小的差异及2种检查方法的相关性。采用配对t检验以及Pearson相关分析进行数据处理。结果：Pentacam与Keratron Scout测量近视患者的瞳孔直径分别为右眼（3.17±0.44）mm、（3.19±0.53）mm，左眼（3.25±0.65）mm、（3.33±0.48）mm，二者差异均无统计学意义。Pentacam与 Keratron Scout测得双眼的Kappa角x轴以及y轴偏移量的差异均无统计学意义，2种方法测得的Kappa 角偏移量具有显著相关性（P<0.05），右眼x轴相关系数为0.966，y轴为0.969，左眼x轴为0.956，y轴为0.913。结论：在瞳孔直径一致的条件下，Pentacam三维眼前节分析诊断系统与Keratron Scout角膜像差仪测量近视以及近视散光患者Kappa角无差异，在手术设计中均可作为Kappa角调整的参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ： Pentacam, Keratron Scout, 瞳孔直径, kappa角

Abstract：

Objective: To investigate and analyze the difference in angle Kappa measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout in refractive surgery patients. Methods: One hundred ninety-six eyes of 98 patients screened for refractive surgery were enrolled in this case series study. Pupil diameters and angle Kappa expressed in rectangular coordinates were measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout. Data differences and correlation between the two examinations were compared and analyzed by a paired t test and Pearson correlation analysis. Results: Pupil diameters measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout were 3.17±0.44 mm, 3.19±0.53 mm (right eye), and 3.25±0.65 mm, 3.33±0.48 mm (left eye), respectively. The differences between the two instruments were not significant. The horizontal and vertical offset measured by the two instruments were not statistically different. There was a significant correlation in the offset of the angle Kappa measured by the two instruments (P<0.05). The correlation coefficients of the right eye horizontal offset, right eye vertical offset, left eye horizontal offset, left eye vertical offset were 0.966, 0.969, 0.956 and 0.913, respectively. Conclusion: There is no statistically significant difference between angle Kappa measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout when pupil diameters are consistent. Both instruments can be used as a reference for the adjustment in angle Kappa in refractive surgery.

Key words： Pentacam Keratron Scout pupil diameter angle kappa

收稿日期: 2019-02-18

通讯作者: 赵炜（ORCID：0000-0001-5645-3576），Email：weieye@126.com

引用本文:

师蓉赵炜董泽红孙丽娟陈雪婷董丽蓉冯洁王雨生. Pentacam三维眼前节分析诊断系统与Keratron Scout角膜像差仪测量 Kappa角的比较[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019, 21(11): 826-830. Rong Shi, Wei Zhao, Zehong Dong, Lijuan Sun, Xueting Chen, Lirong Dong, Jie Feng, Yusheng Wang. Comparison of the Angle Kappa Measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2019, 21(11): 826-830. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.11.005

链接本文:

https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.11.005 或 https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/Y2019/V21/I11/826

[1]	Khakshoor H, McCaughey MV, Vejdani AH, et al. Use of angle kappa in myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Clin Ophthalmol, 2015, 9: 193-195. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S70690.
[2]	Prakash G, Prakash DR, Agarwal A, et al. Predictive factor and kappa angle analysis for visual satisfactions in patients with multifocal IOL implantation. Eye (Lond), 2011, 25(9): 1187- 1193. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.150.
[3]	Harrer A, Hirnschall N, Tabernero J, et al. Variability in angle κ and its influence on higher-order aberrations in pseudophakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2017, 43(8): 1015-1019. DOI: 10. 1016/j.jcrs.2017.05.028.
[4]	Arba Mosquera S, Verma S, McAlinden C. Centration axis in refractive surgery. Eye Vis (Lond), 2015, 2: 4. DOI: 10.1186/ s40662-015-0014-6.
[5]	Summers CG, King RA, Merrill KS, et al. Positive angle kappa in albinism. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004, 138(6): 1093. DOI: 10. 1016/j.ajo.2004.08.024.
[6]	Hashemi H, KhabazKhoob M, Yazdani K, et al. Distribution of angle kappa measurements with Orbscan II in a populationbased survey. J Refract Surg, 2010, 26(12): 966-971. DOI: 10. 3928/1081597X-20100114-06.
[7]	冯旺强, 郑海华, 蔡剑秋. Kappa角对近视屈光手术偏心量的影响. 实用医学杂志, 2010, 26(8): 1348-1350. DOI: 10.3969/j. issn.1006-5725.2010.08.027.
[8]	Chang DH, Waring GO 4th. The subject-fixated coaxially sighted corneal light reflex: A clinical marker for centration of refractive treatments and devices. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 158(5): 863-874. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.06.028.
[9]	De Bernardo M, Borrelli M, Mariniello M, et al. Pentacam vs SP3000P specular microscopy in measuring corneal thickness. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2015, 38(1): 21-27. DOI: 10.1016/j. clae.2014.08.006.
[10]	Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Piñero DP, Fernández J. Avoiding misinterpretations of Kappa angle for clinical research studies with Pentacam. J Optom, 2019, 12(2): 71-73. DOI: 10.1016/j. optom.2018.03.003.
[11]	赵炜, 董泽红, 冯洁, 等. 前节OCT和Pentacam及A超在测量角膜厚度上的比较. 国际眼科杂志, 2013(12): 2551-2553. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2013.12.59.
[12]	Penna RR1, de Sanctis U1, Catalano M1, et al. Placido diskbased topography versus high-resolution rotating Scheimpflug camera for corneal power measurements in keratoconic and postLASIK eyes: Reliability and agreement. Int J Ophthalmol, 2017, 10(3): 453-460. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.03.20. eCollection 2017.
[13]	Hidalgo IR, Rozema JJ, Dhubhghaill SN, et al. Repeatability and inter-device agreement for three different methods of keratometry: Placido, Scheimpflug, and color LED corneal topography. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(3): 176-181. DOI: 10. 3928/1081597X-20150224-01.
[14]	Moshirfar M, Hoggan RN, Muthappan V. Angle Kappa and its importance in refractive surgery. Oman J Ophthalmol, 2013, 6(3): 151-158. DOI: 10.4103/0974-620X.122268.
[15]	Kymionis GD, Panagopoulou SI, Aslanides IM, et al. Topographically supported customized ablation for the management of decentered laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004, 137(5): 806-811. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003. 11.077.
[16]	孙丽霞, 熊露, 张日平, 等. Pentacam、iTrace和Orbscan IIz测量近视眼角膜前表面Q值和屈光力的一致性. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2013, 15(3): 142-145. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j. issn.1674-845X.2013.03.004.
[17]	黄锦海, 李坚, 鲁伟聪, 等. Lenstar、Pentacam与Sirius测量白内障患者眼前节生物参数的比较.中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2014, 16(1): 30-35. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674- 845X.2014.01.007.
[18]	林巧雅, 李学喜, 黄雪丽. Pentacam和Topolyzer测量Kappa角的比较.中国实用眼科杂志, 2017, 35(6): 576-578. DOI: 10. 3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2017.06.007.
[19]	Domínguez-Vicent A1, Monsálvez-Romín D, Pérez-Vives C, et al. Measurement of angle Kappa with Orbscan II and Galilei G4: Effect of accommodation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2014, 252(2): 249-255. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013- 2509-y.