To compare the changes in dry eye parameters and corneal sensation between FS-LASIK (femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis) and SMILE (small incision lenticule extraction), and to investigate the effect of the type of surgery on tear film and corneal sensation; to analyze the correlation between the two indicators. Methods: In this prospective non-randomized control study, 48 eyes of 24 patients underwent FS-LASIK and 41 eyes of 21 patients underwent SMILE. The tear meniscus height (TMH) and non-invasive tear film break-up time, including NIF-BUT and NIAvg-BUT, were measured by a Keratograph 5M ocular surface analyzer and were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Central corneal sensation was examined as well. Repeated measures ANOVA was used for preoperative and postoperative comparison within the same group; an independent sample t test was used for comparison of general data and dry eye parameters between the different groups; Spearman correlation analysis was used for the correlation between central corneal sensation and dry eye parameters. Results: The values of all dry eye parameters and central corneal sensation showed no differences before surgery between the two groups. In the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups, the TMH results decreased at both postoperative time points (F=21.213, P<0.001; F=14.648, P<0.001). The TMH results were higher in the SMILE group than that in the FS-LASIK group at both postoperative time points (t=-5.549, P<0.001; t=-3.028, P=0.003). In the FS-LASIK group, the NIF-BUT values decreased within 1 month after surgery (F=4.603, P=0.019). In the SMILE group, the NIF-BUT values presented no significant decrease at both postoperative time points (F=0.599, P=0.516). The NIF-BUT values were higher in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group at 1 month postoperatively (t=-3.430, P=0.001). The NIAvg-BUT values in the FS-LASIK group decreased within 1 month after surgery (F=3.580, P=0.042). The NIAvg-BUT values presented no significant decrease at both postoperative time points in the SMILE group (F=0.274, P=0.761). The NIAvg-BUT values were higher at both postoperative time points in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group (t=-2.395, P=0.019; t=-2.431, P=0.017). The central corneal sensation results had decreased at both postoperative time points in the FS-LASIK group (F=121.919, P<0.001), but had decreased at only 1 month after surgery in the SMILE group (F=54.032, P<0.001). The central corneal sensation results were better in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group at both postoperative time points (t=-5.367, P<0.001; t=-3.242, P=0.002). There was a positive correlation between central corneal sensation and dry eye parameters at both follow-up time points in both groups (P<0.05). Conclusions: There are different degrees of change in dry eye parameters and central corneal sensation at the early postoperative period in the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups. The dry eye parameters and central corneal sensation in the SMILE group are better than those in the FS-LASIK group. There is a positive correlation between central corneal sensation and dry eye parameters in both groups.
Mengher LS, Bron AJ, Tonge SR, et al. A non-invasive instrument for clinical assessment of the pre-corneal tear film stability. Curr Eye Res, 1985, 4(1): 1-7.
[3]
Bron AJ, Smith JA, Calonge M. Methodologies to diagnose andmonitor dry eye disease: Report of the diagnostic methodology subcommittee of the international dry eye workshop (2007). Ocular Surface, 2007, 5(2): 108-111.
[4]
Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. The repeatability of clinical measurements of dry eye. Cornea, 2004, 23(3): 272-285.
[5]
Abdelfattah NS, Dastiridou A, Sadda SR, et al. Noninvasive imaging of tear film dynamics in eyes with ocular surface disease. Cornea, 2015, 34 Suppl 10: S48-52. DOI: 10.1097/ ICO.0000000000000570.
[6]
Arriola-Villalobos P, Fernández-Vigo JI, Díaz-Valle D, et al. Assessment of lower tear meniscus measurements obtained with Keratograph and agreement with Fourier-domain opticalcoherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol, 2015, 99(8): 1120- 1125. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306453.
Mertzanis P, Abetz L, Rajagopalan K, et al. The relative burden of dry eye in patients' lives: Comparisons to a U.S. normative sample. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci, 2005, 46(1): 46-50. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0915.
Liu M, Chen Y, Wang D, et al. Clinical outcomes after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism: A prospective randomized comparative study. Cornea, 2016, 35(2): 210-216. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000707.
[13]
Vestergaard A, Ivarsen AR, Asp S, et al. Small-incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia: Predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction. J Cataract Refract surg, 2012, 38(11): 2003-2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.021.
Li M, Zhao J, Shen Y, et al. Comparison of dry eye and corneal sensitivity between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia. PLoS One, 2013, 8(10): e77797. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077797.
[16]
Demirok A, Ozgurhan EB, Agca A, et al. Corneal sensation after corneal refractive surgery with small incision lenticule extraction. Optom Vis Sci, 2013, 90(10): 1040-1047. DOI: 10.1097/ OPX.0b013e31829d9926.
Auran JD, Koester CJ, Kleiman NJ, et al. Scanning slit confocal microscopic observation of cell morphology and movement within the normal human anterior cornea. Ophthalmology, 1995, 102(1): 33-41.
[19]
Aristeidou A , Taniguchi EV , Tsatsos M , et al. The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser. Eye Vis, 2015, 2(1): 12-16. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-015-0022-6.
[20]
Soong HK, Malta JB. Femtosecond lasers in ophthalmology. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009, 147(2): 189-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo. 2008.08.026.
[21]
Mian SI, Shtein RM, Nelson A, et al. Effect of hinge position on corneal sensation and dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007, 33(7): 1190-1194. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.031.
[22]
Golas L, Manche EE. Dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond laser and mechanical keratome. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(8): 1476-1480. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011. 03.035.
[23]
Aras C, Ozdamar A, Bahcecioglu H, et al. Decreased tear secretion after laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Refract Surg, 2000, 16(3): 362-364.
[24]
Patel S, Pérez-Santonja JJ, Alió JL, et al. Corneal sensitivity and some properties of the tear film after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg, 2001, 17(1): 17-24.
Listed N. Research in dry eye: report of the research subcommittee of the international dry eye workshop (2007). Ocul Surf, 2007, 5(2): 179-193. DOI: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70086-1.
[27]
Wei S, Wang W. Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FSLASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes. Graefes Arch of Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2013, 251(6): 1645- 1654. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2272-0.
[28]
He J, Bazan NG, Bazan HE. Mapping the entire human corneal nerve architecture. Exp Eye Res, 2010, 91(4): 513-523. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2010.07.007.