角膜激光矫正术后上皮重塑的研究进展

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20190626-00184

摘要
图/表
参考文献(44)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF 666KB HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

文章导读

摘要角膜上皮细胞具有重塑性，角膜激光手术后，为了维持角膜前表面的光滑，上皮细胞重新排列，上皮厚度在不同区域和象限呈现不均匀分布。角膜上皮厚度的变化幅度受拟矫正屈光度、手术方式、眼表状态等因素的影响。角膜上皮重塑与术后的屈光回退有一定的相关性。认识角膜激光矫正术后上皮重塑的规律有助于提高屈光手术的精确性。现笔者对目前角膜上皮厚度的测量方法以及各种角膜激光矫正术后的上皮重塑特点进行综述。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ： , 角膜上皮厚度, 重塑, 激光视力矫正, 屈光回退

Abstract： The epithelial cell has the ability tore-establish itself. After corneal laser surgery, the epithelium remodels to obtain a smooth anterior corneal surface and reveals a non-uniform distribution across the entire cornea. The epithelial remodeling is related to the attempted refractive error correction and can be influenced by the surgical procedure and ocular surface condition. It plays a role in postoperative refractive regression. Understanding the changes in corneal epithelial thickness helps to improve the accuracy of refractive surgery. This article reviews the measurements of corneal epithelial thickness and postoperative epithelial remodeling.

Key words： corneal epithelial thickness epithelial remodeling laser vision correction refractive regression

收稿日期: 2019-06-26

PACS:

基金资助:

通讯作者: 王铮（ORCID：0000-0002-7985-0811），Email：gzstwang@gmail.com

引用本文:

樊利敏1 王铮1，2. 角膜激光矫正术后上皮重塑的研究进展[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2021, 23(3): 236-240. Limin Fan1,Zheng Wang1, 2. Advances in Corneal Epithelial Remodeling after Laser Vision Correction. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2021, 23(3): 236-240. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20190626-00184

链接本文:

https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/ 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20190626-00184 或 https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/Y2021/V23/I3/236

[1]	Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Rate of change of curvature of the corneal stromal surface drives epithelial compensatory changes and remodeling. J Refract Surg, 2014, 30(12): 799-802. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20141113-02.
[2]	彭梅, 胡磾, 姬戎媛, 等. 超高分辨率OCT测量角膜上皮层厚度在圆锥角膜诊断中的价值. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2015, 17(1): 9-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.01. 003.
[3]	Silverman RH, Urs R, RoyChoudhury A, et al. Epithelial remodeling as basis for machine-based identification of keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(3): 1580- 1587. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12578.
[4]	Hong J, Qian T, Yang Y, et al. Corneal epithelial thickness map in long-term soft contact lenses wearers. Optom Vis Sci, 2014, 91(12): 1455-1461. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000410.
[5]	Atia R, Jouve L, Sandali O, et al. Early epithelial remodeling after standard and iontophoresis-assisted corneal cross-linking as evaluated by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. J Refract Surg, 2018, 34(8): 551-558. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X- 20180702-01.
[6]	Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, et al. Epithelial thickness after hyperopic LASIK: Three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg, 2010, 26(8): 555-564. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20091105-02.
[7]	Chen X, Stojanovic A, Liu Y, et al. Postoperative changes in corneal epithelial and stromal thickness profiles after photorefractive keratectomy in treatment of myopia. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(7): 446-453. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20150623- 02.
[8]	Luft N, Ring MH, Dirisamer M, et al. Corneal epithelial remodeling induced by small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2016, 57(9): 176-183. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18879.
[9]	Ryu IH, Kim BJ, Lee JH, et al. Comparison of corneal epithelial remodeling after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg, 2017, 33(4): 250-256. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20170111-01.
[10]	Fan L, Xiong L, Zhang B, et al. Longitudinal and regional nonuniform remodeling of corneal epithelium after topographyguided FS-LASIK. J Refract Surg, 2019, 35(2): 88-95. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20190104-01.
[11]	Tang M, Li Y, Huang D. Corneal epithelial remodeling after LASIK measured by fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Ophthalmol, 2015, 2015(6): 860313-860315. DOI: 10.1155/2015/860313.
[12]	Salomão MQ, Hofling-Lima AL, Lopes BT, et al. Role of the corneal epithelium measurements in keratorefractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2017, 28(4): 326-336. DOI: 10.1097/ ICU.0000000000000379.
[13]	Hodden BA, Payor S, Mertz GW. Changes in thickness in the corneal layers. Am J Optom, 1979, 56: 821.
[14]	Møller-Pedersen T, Vogel M, Li HF, et al. Quantification of stromal thinning, epithelial thickness, and corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy using in vivo confocal microscopy. Ophthalmology, 1997, 104(3): 360-368. DOI: 10.1016/s0161- 6420(97)30307-8.
[15]	Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. High-frequency ultrasound measurement of the thickness of the corneal epithelium. Refract Corneal Surg, 1993, 9(5): 385-387.
[16]	Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Change in epithelial thickness profile 24 hours and longitudinally for 1 year after myopic LASIK: Three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg, 2012, 28(3): 195-201. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20120127-02.
[17]	Reinstein DZ, Yap TE, Archer TJ, et al. Comparison of corneal epithelial thickness measurement between fourier-domain OCT and very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(7): 438-445. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20150623-01.
[18]	Hashmani N, Hashmani S, Saad CM. Wide corneal epithelial mapping using an optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2018, 59(3): 1652-1658. DOI: 10.1167/ iovs.17-23717.
[19]	Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science, 1991, 254(5035): 1178-1181. DOI: 10.1126/science.1957169.
[20]	Ma JX, Wang L, Weikert MP, et al. Evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of corneal epithelial thickness mapping for a 9-mm zone using optical coherence tomography. Cornea, 2019, 38(1): 67-73. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001806.
[21]	Sella R, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal epithelial thickness mapping with spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal and diseased cornea eyes. Am J Ophthalmol, 2019, 197: 88-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.09.008.
[22]	Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, et al. Precorneal and pre- and postlens tear film thickness measured indirectly with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2003, 44(6): 2524-2528. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0731.
[23]	Werkmeister RM, Alex A, Kaya S, et al. Measurement of tear film thickness using ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2013, 54(8): 5578- 5583. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-11920.
[24]	Dua HS, Shanmuganathan VA, Powell-Richards AO, et al. Limbal epithelial crypts: A novel anatomical structure and a putative limbal stem cell niche. Br J Ophthalmol, 2005, 89(5): 529-532. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.049742.
[25]	Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Longitudinal postoperative lasik epithelial thickness profile changes in correlation with degree of myopia correction. J Refract Surg, 2014, 30(3): 166-171. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140219-01.
[26]	许琛琛, 吴斯琪, 王勤美. 正常人眼角膜上皮层厚度的分布及其相关因素. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2015, 17(12): 712-716. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.12.003.
[27]	张月强, 高雅晴,褚慧,等. 经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术治疗低中度近视术后中央角膜上皮厚度的变化. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019, 21(3): 217-222. DOI: 10.3760/cma. j.issn.1674-845X.2019.03.011.
[28]	Wasielica-Poslednik J, Lisch W, Bell K, et al. Reproducibility and daytime-dependent changes of corneal epithelial thickness and whole corneal thickness measured with fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Cornea, 2016, 35(3): 342-349. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000714.
[29]	侯杰, 雷玉琳, 郑秀云. 近视眼角膜上皮厚度分布特点及其与角膜生物力学性能的关系. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2014, 16(5): 291-296. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674- 845X.2014.05.008.
[30]	Lohmann CP, Patmore A, Reischl U, et al. The importance of the corneal epithelium in excimer-laser photorefractive keratectomy. Ger J Ophthalmol, 1996, 5(6): 368-372.
[31]	Lohmann CP, Reischl U, Marshall J. Regression and epithelial hyperplasia after myopic photorefractive keratectomy in a human cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1999, 25(5): 712-715. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00014-0.
[32]	Ivarsen A, Fledelius W, Hjortdal JØ. Three-year changes in epithelial and stromal thickness after PRK or LASIK for high myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009, 50(5): 2061-2066. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2853.
[33]	Chayet AS, Assil KK, Montes M, et al. Regression and its mechanisms after laser in situ keratomileusis in moderate and high myopia. Ophthalmology, 1998, 105(7): 1194-1199. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)97020-8.
[34]	Pan Q, Gu YS, Wang J, et al. Differences between regressive eyes and non-regressive eyes after LASIK for myopia in the time course of corneal changes assessed with the Orbscan. Ophthalmologica, 2004, 218(2): 96-101. DOI: 10.1159/ 000076143.
[35]	Moshirfar M, Desautels JD, Walker BD, et al. Mechanisms of optical regression following corneal laser refractive surgery: Epithelial and stromal responses. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol, 2018, 7(1): 1-9.
[36]	Cho Y, Hieda O, Wakimasu K, et al. Multiple linear regression analysis of the impact of corneal epithelial thickness on refractive error post corneal refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol, 2019, 207: 326-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.05. 016.
[37]	Ganesh S, Brar S, Relekar KJ. Epithelial thickness profile changes following small incision refractive lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg, 2016, 32(7): 473-482. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20160512-01.
[38]	Reinstein DZ, Srivannaboon S, Gobbe M, et al. Epithelial thickness profile changes induced by myopic LASIK as measured by Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg, 2009, 25(5): 444-450. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X- 20090422-07.
[39]	Kanellopoulos AJ. Comparison of corneal epithelial remodeling over 2 years in LASIK versus SMILE: A contralateral eye study. Cornea, 2019, 38(3): 290-296. DOI: 10.1097/ ICO.0000000000001821.
[40]	Vinciguerra P, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra R. Corneal curvature gradient determines corneal healing process and epithelial behavior. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(4): 281-282. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20150319-08.
[41]	Wilson SE, Mohan RR, Hong JW, et al. The wound healing response after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy: elusive control of biological variability and effect on custom laser vision correction. Arch Ophthalmol, 2001, 119(6): 889-896. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.119.6.889.
[42]	Huang D, Tang M, Shekhar R. Mathematical model of corneal surface smoothing after laser refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol, 2003, 135(3): 267-278. DOI: 10.1016/s0002- 9394(02)01942-6.
[43]	Ljubimov AV, Saghizadeh M. Progress in corneal wound healing. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2015, 49: 17-45. DOI: 10.1016/ j.preteyeres.2015.07.002.
[44]	Suzuki K, Saito J, Yanai R, et al. Cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions during corneal epithelial wound healing. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2003, 22(2): 113-133. DOI: 10.1016/s1350- 9462(02)00042-3.