Objective To preliminarily evaluate the clinical efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification. Methods In this prapective study, 167 patients (200 eyes) with cataract were randomly divided into two groups. There were 86 patients (100 eyes) in the femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification group (femto group) and 81 patients (100 eyes) in the traditional phacoemulsification group traditional group. Phacoemulsification power and time were recorded for each procedure. Changes in surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), visual acuity, and corneal endothelial cell count were measured and complications were noted. Tear break-up time, the height of the tear meniscus and the grade of dry eye were also assessed preoperative and postoperative 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months for the two groups. Data were analyzed using independent t test and repeated measured ANOVA. Results Statistically significant differences were found in the effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) and the average phacoemulsification power (AVE) of the two groups (t=7.19 and 3.73, both P<0.05). On the second month after surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in the visual acuity of the two groups (t=0.84, P>0.05) while the difference in the SIA was obvious (t=2.78, P<0.05). The corneal endothelial cell loss rate of the femtosecond group was lower than that of the traditional group when the nuclear lens was less than or equal to grade Ⅲ (t=2.31, P<0.05), while the loss rate was higher when the nuclear lens was above grade Ⅲ (t=3.92, P<0.05). In the femtosecond group, at 1 week postoperatively, there was a reduction in the mean tear break-up time and a large increase in the grade of dry eye(F=6.80, P<0.05). In the traditional group, at 1 week (P<0.05) and 2 weeks (P<0.05) postoperatively, there was a reduction in the mean tear break-up time and a large increase in the grade of dry eye (F=24.00, P<0.05). At 1 week, there was a significant increase in the mean height of the tear meniscus (F=6.48, P<0.05). Conclusion Femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification is safe and efficient. It can reduce the use of ultrasonic energy, reducing SIA. The influence on the corneal endothelial cells differed according to the nuclear lens grade. The reason for this needs further study.
Xia Y,Liu X, Luo L, et al. Early changes in clear cornea incision after phacoemulsification: An anterior segment potical coherence tomography stydy[J]. Acta Ophthalmol,2009,87(7):764-768.
[4]
Ernest PH, Kiessling LA, Lavery KT. Relative strength of cataract incisions in cadaver eyes[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,1991,17 suppl:668-671.
McDonnell PJ, Taban M, Sarayba M. et al. Dynamic morphology of clearcorneal cataract incisions[J]. Ophthalmology,2003,110(12):2342-2348.
[7]
Sarayba MA, Taban M, Ignacio T. Inflow of ocular surface fluid through clear corneal cataract incisions: a laboratory model[J]. Ophthalmology,2004,138(2):206-210.
[8]
Dick HB, Pena-Aceves A, Manns M, et al. New technology for sizing the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis: Prospective trial[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2008,34(7):1136-1144.
[9]
Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2008,34(3):368-376.
[10]
Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Meacock WR. The effect of capsulorhexis size on posterior capsular opacification: One-year results of a randomized prospective trial[J]. Am J Opthalmol,1999,128(3):271-279.
[11]
Sanders DR, Higginbotham RW, Opatowsky IE, et al. Hyperopic shift in refraction associated with implantation of the single-piece Collamer intraocular lens[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2006,32(2):2110-2112.
[12]
Nagy Z, Takacs A, Filkorn T. Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery[J]. J Refract Surg,2009,25(12):1053-1056.
[13]
Takács AI, Kovács I, Miháltz K, et al. Central corneal volume and endothelial cell count following femtosecond laser-assisted refractive cataract surgery compared to conventional phacoemulsification[J]. J Refract Surg,2012,28(6):387-391.
[14]
Uy HS, Edwards K, Curtis N. Femtosecond phacoemulsification: the business and the medicine[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol,2012, 23(1):33-39.
[15]
Cho P, Brown B. The effect of benoxinate on the tear stability of Hong Kong-Chinese[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,1995,15(4):299-304.
Baudouin C, de Lunardo C. Short-term comparative study of topical 2% carteolol with and without benzalkonium chloride in healthy volunteers[J]. Br J Ophthalmol,1998,82(1):39-42.
Ozdamar A, Aras C, Karakas N, et al. Changes in tear flow and tear film stability after photorefractive keratectomy[J]. Cornea,1999,18(4):437-439.
[20]
Chen S, Wang IJ. Effect of tear film stability on fluctuation of vision after photorefractive keratectomy[J]. J Refract Surg,1999, 15(6):668-672.
[21]
Chaurasia SS, Luengo Gimeno F, Tan K, et al. In vivo real-time intraocular pressure variations during LASIK flap creation[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2010,51(9):4641-4645.
[22]
Hernández-Verdejo JL, Teus MA, Román JM, et al. Porcine model to compare real-time intraocular pressure during LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2007,48(1):68-72.
[23]
Vetter JM, Holzer MP, Teping C, et al. Intraocular pressure during corneal flap preparation: comparison among four femtosecond lasers in porcine eyes[J]. J Refract Surg,2011,27(6):427-433
[24]
Talamo JH, Gooding P, Angeley D, et al. Optical patient interface in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: contact corneal applanation versus liquid immersion[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2013,39(4):501-510.
[25]
Roberts TV, Lawless M, Bali SJ, et al. Surgical outcomes and safety of femtosecond laser cataract surgery: a prospective study of 1500 consecutive cases[J]. Ophthalmology,2013,120(2):227-233.