|
|
Clinical analysis of the decrease in positive relative accommodation in juvenile and young adult myopes |
XU Yan-chun,FAN Chun-lei,MA Xiao-li,ZHANG Fu-sheng,TIAN Xiao-dan,ZHANG Li-hui |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the differences in positive relative accommodation (PRA) and negative relative accommodation (NRA) in juvenile emmetropes and myopes, and to analyze the relationship between the differences in PRA and NRA and the onset of myopia. Methods In this cross-sectional study, the subjects were divided into two groups, a juvenile group and young adult group (entrant group). The juvenile group included 43 emmetropes (+0.5~-0.25 D, 7-16 years old, average age 10.7±3.0 years) and 110 myopes (-0.5~-3.00 D, anisometropia less than -1.00 D, 7-16 years old, average age 11.5±2.6 years). There were 266 participants (average age 18.76±0.80 years) in the youth group, including 29 emmetropes and 237 myopes. PRA and NRA were measured by a phoroptor based on computer optometry. A one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the comparisons between these two groups. Results In the juvenile group, PRA was -5.52±1.21 D for emmetropes compared to -2.27±1.19 D for myopes, which was a statistically significant difference (F=227.26, P<0.01). The NRA for emmetropes was +2.41±0.65 D and was +2.21±0.73 D for myopes. The difference was not statistically significant. The PRA/NRA ratios for emmetropes and myopes were 2.35±0.45 and 1.10±0.60, and the difference was statistically significantly (F=156.40, P<0.01). In the young adult group, PRA was -4.87±1.47 D for emmetropes in comparison to -2.63±1.41 D for myopes, which was a statistically significant difference (F=66.62, P<0.01). The NRA of emmetropes was +2.09±0.46 D and was +1.98±0.48 D for myopes. The difference was not statistically significant (F=1.55, P=0.214). The PRA/NRA ratios for emmetropes and myopes were 2.35±0.51 and 1.34±0.93. The difference was statistically significant (F=47.28, P<0.01). Conclusion The PRA and PRA/NRA ratio for juvenile and young adult myopes is significantly less than for emmetropes. The decrease in PRA, i.e., accommodation reserve, is a significantly different index between myopes and emmetropes in juveniles and young adults.
|
Received: 20 December 2011
|
Corresponding Authors:
XU Yan-chun
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B. Accommodative error, adaptation and myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,1999,19:159-164.
|
[2] |
Fong DS. Is myopia related to amplitude of accommodation? Am J Ophthalmol,1997,123:416-418.
|
[3] |
Radhakrishnan H, Allen PM, Charman WN. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2007,48:4375-4382.
|
[4] |
Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Hayes JR, et al. Accommodative lag before and after the onset of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2006,47:837-846.
|
[5] |
Rosenfield M, Abraham-Cohen JA. Blur sensitivity in myopes. Optom Vis Sci,1999,76:303-307.
|
[6] |
张霞飞,施明光. 调节滞后与青少年近视的关系. 眼视光学杂志,2005,7:248-252.
|
[7] |
Аветисов. Близорукость. Москва: Медицина,1986:145.
|
[8] |
Goss DA. Clinical accommodation and heterophoria findings preceding juvenile onset of myopia. Optom Vis Sci,1991,68:110-116.
|
[9] |
吕帆,徐丹,瞿佳. 双眼协动参数在近视眼的差异研究. 中华眼科杂志,2004,40:583-586.
|
[10] |
Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Held R. Accommodation, accommodative convergence, and response AC/A rations before and at the onset of myopia in children. Optom Vis Sci,2005,82:273-278.
|
[11] |
胡诞宁,褚仁远,吕帆,等. 近视眼. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:140.
|
|
|
|