|
|
A comparison of the SRK/T and optimized Haigis formulas for cataracts with high myopia |
Wei Liqing,Chen Yu,Lian Hengli,Nie Li,Fu Yinghui |
Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Hangzhou 310020, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the factors that influence postoperative refractive error using the SRK/T and optimized Haigis formulas for eyes with high myopia, and to compare the accuracy of the two formulas. Methods This was a retrospective study. Thirty-eight patients (63 eyes) with axial lengths of ≥26 mm underwent cataract surgery from July 2011 to March 2015 in the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Axial length (AL), corneal curvature (K) and preoperative anterior chamber depth (AC) were measured by IOL-Master preoperatively. The SRK/T and optimized Haigis formulas were used to determine the intraocular lens (IOL) power and monofocal foldable IOLs were then implanted during surgery. Refractions were measured with a phoropter three months postoperatively. A paired t test was used to analyze the difference in refractive error measurements calculated by the two formulas. The difference in the proportion of hyperopia migration was analyzed by a McNemar test while the difference in the distribution of absolute error (AE) was analyzed by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The correlation of the difference in target refractions between the two formulas, as well as AE, AL, corneal curvature and preoperative anterior chamber depth were analyzed by a Pearson correlation analysis. Multiple linear regression was used to investigate the relative factors in refractive error based on the two formulas. Results Refractive errors calculated by the SRK/T and optimized Haigis formulas were -0.52±0.79 D and -0.67±0.79 D, respectively, with ratios of a hyperopic migration of 78% and 86%, respectively. The difference in target refraction between the two formulas was negatively correlated with AL (r=-0.27, P<0.05), and positively correlated with K (r=0.73, P<0.01). Both AEs were positively correlated with axial length (SRK/T: r=0.43, P<0.01; optimized Haigis: r=0.31, P<0.05). Anterior chamber depth was grouped into AC≤3.5 mm and AC>3.5 mm. In the group with AC≤3.5 mm, linear regression formulas for refractive errors calculated with the SRK/T and optimized Haigis formula were ■=3.74-0.15AL (R2=0.27, F=3.88, P<0.05) and ■=12.03-0.19K-0.13AL (R2=0.27, F=3.73, P<0.05). In the group with AC>3.5 mm, linear regression formulas for refractive errors with the SRK/T and optimized Haigis formula were ■=1.40AC-0.37AL (R2=0.62, F=13.40, P<0.01) and ■=14.02+1.76AC-0.25K-0.35AL (R2=0.62, F=13.59, P<0.01). Conclusion For eyes with a long axial length, the optimized Haigis formula is better than the SRK/T formula because postoperative refractive error exhibits a more obvious hyperopic shift using the SRK/T formula. With regard to a steep K value, refractive error increases as K augments using the optimized Haigis formula. Thus the SRK/T formula is the better choice under this condition. When preoperative anterior chamber depth is more than 3.5 mm, the target myopic refraction can be reduced with either formula.
|
Received: 24 September 2015
|
Corresponding Authors:
Fu Yinghui, Email:7641995@qq.com
|
|
|
|
[1] |
El-Nafees R, Moawad A, Kishk H, et al. Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with high axial myopia before cataract surgery[J]. Saudi J Ophthalmol,2010,24(3):77-80. DOI:10.1016/j.sjopt.2010.03.006.
|
[2] |
孙靖,梁四妥,田芳,等. 伴后巩膜葡萄肿的高度近视白内障患者人工晶状体屈光度测算[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2013,31(6):578-581. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2013.06.013.
|
[3] |
张振平. 人工晶状体屈光手术学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:76.
|
[4] |
杨琴,汤萍,崔新华,等. 高度近视合并白内障超声乳化术后屈光误差分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2012,12(6):1134-1135. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5123.2012.06.39.
|
[5] |
李绍伟,任杰,萨其热,等. 高度近视白内障患者人工晶状体度数计算LSW1经验公式临床结果报告[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2015,15(3):499-502. DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2015.3.32.
|
[6] |
郑虔,赵镇南,廉恒丽,等. 轴性高度近视眼超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体植入术后屈光度数误差分析[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2015,51(4):276-281. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2015.04.009.
|
[7] |
王于蓝,王敏,高峰,等. 超高度近视白内障不同撕囊口直径下术后人工晶状体稳定性观察[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2015,15(1):76-78. DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2015.1.21.
|
[8] |
陶津华,王于蓝,盛耀华,等. 超声乳化白内障吸除术后晶状体前囊膜收缩引起的远视漂移一例[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2013,49(5):447-448. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2013.05.013.
|
[9] |
Hayashi K, Hayashi H. Comparison of the stability of 1-piece and 3-piece acrylic intraocular lenses in the lens capsule[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2005,31(2):337-342. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004. 06.042.
|
[10] |
Morgan-Warren PJ, Smith JA. Intraocular lens-edge design and material factors contributing to posterior-capsulotomy rates: comparing Hoya FY60aD, PY60aD, and AcrySof SN60WF[J]. Clin Ophthalmol,2013,7:1661-1667. DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S48824.
|
[11] |
Aramberri J. Intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery: Double K method[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003,29(11):2063-2068. DOI:10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00957-X.
|
|
|
|