|
|
Clinical Effects of a Phakic Posterior Chamber Implantable Collamer Lenswith Centra FLOW for Correcting High Myopia |
Hongxia Wang,Qizhi Zhou,Yang Gao |
Chongqing Aier Maige Ophthalmology Hospital, Chongqing 400060, China
Chongqing Aier Ophthalmology Hospital, Chongqing 400020, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To study the efficacy, safety, and change in visual quality of a phakic posterior chamber implantable collamer lens with centra FLOW (PPC-ICL V4c) for correcting high myopia. Methods: This was a prospective study of 58 eyes of 32 patients who were candidates for PPC-ICL V4c. The following indicators were compared: preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), preoperative aberrations and aberrations 6 months postoperatively, contrast sensitivity, and the Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC). All patients were followed up for more than 6 months. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests. Results: Preoperative UCVA (LogMAR visual acuity) and UCVA 6 months after surgery was 1.54±0.26 and -0.04±0.06, respectively. Visual acuity 6 months after surgery improved compared to preoperative acuity (t=30.94, P<0.001). Compared to preoperative BCVA, 56 eyes had equal or better BCVA 6 months after surgery, which accounted for 97% of the total number of eyes. There was an increase of 1 row or better for 28 eyes, which accounted for 48% of the total number of eyes. Postoperative higher-order wavefront aberrations, spherical aberrations, coma, and trefoil root mean square (RMS) were 0.292±0.093 μm, -0.030±0.050 μm, 0.096±0.090 μm,and 0.224±0.091 μm, respectively. Total higher-order aberrations increased and coma was reduced, but the differences were not statistically significant. Spherical aberrations were reduced (t=3.87, P=0.001) and trefoil increased (t=-5.47, P<0.001). All contrast sensitivities 6 months after surgery were better than preoperative levels for 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 cycles/degree. There were also significant differences between the photopic 3.0 and 6.0 cycles/degree and mesopic 6 cycles/degree (t=-2.12, P=0.047; t=-2.51,P=0.021; t=-3.27, P=0.004). The QIRC score for patients improved (t=-2.41, P=0.039) after surgery.Conclusions: Implants of PPC-ICL V4c are a safe and effective surgical method for correcting high myopia. All patients are satisfied with the surgery, which can improve visual quality and quality of life.
|
Received: 25 March 2016
|
Corresponding Authors:
Qizhi Zhou, Chongqing Aier Ophthalmology Hospital, Chongqing 400020, China(Email: zhouqizhi6931@sina.com)
|
|
|
|
[1] |
沈晔, 周天安, 杜持新, 等. 有晶状体眼后房型人工晶体植入矫正高度近视的临床评价[J].中华眼科杂志,2007,43(11):1000-1004.DOI:10.3760/j.issn:0412-4081.2007.11.009.
|
[2] |
Igarashi A, Shimizu K, Kamiya K. Eight-year follow-up of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for moderate
|
|
to high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 157(3): 532-539. e1.DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.11.006.
|
[3] |
田颖, 文丹, 蒋剑, 等. 有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术治疗高度近视的稳定性及安全性研究. 中国医师杂志, 2016,18(10): 1450-1454, 1459. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.
|
20 |
16.10.003.
|
[4] |
Huseynova T, Ozaki S, Ishizuka T, et al. Comparative study of 2 types of implantable collamer lenses, 1 with and 1 without a central artificial hole. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 157(6): 1136-1143.DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.01.032.
|
[5] |
Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ando W, et al. Comparison of vault after implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with
|
|
and without a central hole. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2015, 41(1):67-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.11.011.
|
[6] |
于春晶, 张立军, 牟亚男, 等. 中央孔型ICL V4c矫治高度近视的临床疗效观察. 中国医学创新, 2016, 13(33): 51-54. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2016.33.015.
|
[7] |
Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) Questionnaire: development and validation. Optom Vis Sci, 2004, 81(10): 769-777.
|
[8] |
许毅从, 杨新军, 余野, 等. 屈光矫正者生命质量量表在中国的应用及评价. 眼科研究, 2007, 25(8): 623-626. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2007.08.017.
|
[9] |
王晓瑛, 周行涛. 从忽视到重视——可植入式眼内镜的最新进展及发展趋势. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2015, 17(8):449-452. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.08.001.
|
[10] |
Higueras-Esteban A, Ortiz-Gomariz A, Gutiérrez-Ortega R, et al.Intraocular pressure after implantation of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens with Centra FLOW without iridotomy. Am J Ophthalmol, 2013, 156(4): 800-805. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.
|
20 |
13.05.018.[11] Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, et al. Clinical evaluation of optical quality and intraocular scattering after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2012, 53(6): 3161-3166. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9650.
|
[12] |
Alfonso JF, Lisa C, Fernández-Vega CL, et al. Clinical outcomes after implantation of a posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole for myopic correction.J Cataract Refract Surg, 2013, 39(6): 915-921. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.036.
|
[13] |
王雁, 赵堪兴. 波前像差与临床视觉矫正. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2011: 34.
|
[14] |
Toto L, Vecchiarino L, D'Ugo E, et al. Astigmatism correction with toric IOL: analysis of visual performance, position,and wavefront error. J Refract Surg, 2013, 29(7): 476-483. DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20130617-06.
|
[15] |
王凌飞, 杨瑞波, 赵少贞. CACHET有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的临床评价. 眼科新进展, 2013, 33(6):546-550.
|
[16] |
Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Keeves JP, et al. The activities of Daily Vision Scale for cataract surgery outcomes: re-evaluating validity with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2003,44(7): 2892-2899.
|
[17] |
凌红. 大学生近视矫正方式的选择原因分析.中国校医, 2006,20(3): 263-264. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7062.2006.03.017.
|
[18] |
Pérez-Vives C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D, et al. Optical quality comparison of conventional and hole-visian implantable collamer lens at different degrees of decentering. Am J Ophthalmol,2013, 156(1): 69-76. e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.030.
|
[19] |
Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, et al. Intraindividual comparison of visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole implantation for moderate to high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol, 2012, 154(3): 486-494.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.001.
|
|
|
|