间歇性外斜视手术对调节反应及调节微波动的影响

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2018.09.005

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (27)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (703 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

Objective: To study the changes in accommodative response and microfluctuations in patients with intermittent exotropia (IXT) before and after surgery. Methods: Twenty-nine patients 8-20 years of age with IXT were recruited for a prospective clinical study at Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from June to August 2017. A Grand Seiko WAM-5500 auto-refractor was used to measure the accommodative response and microfluctuations at 33 cm before and after strabotomy. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test. results: Before surgery, the accommodative response in IXT patients was higher under binocular conditions (dominant eye: 2.23±0.44 D; nondominant eye: 2.44±0.51 D) compared to monocular conditions (2.03±0.40 D; 2.11±0.40 D)(t=2.481, P=0.019; t=2.786, P=0.009). After surgery, the accommodative response under binocular conditions (after surgery: 2.00±0.37 D; 2.11±0.50 D; t=2.628,P=0.014; t=3.120, P=0.004) decreased and accommodative microfluctuations in IXT patients under binocular conditions also decreased (before surgery: 0.22±0.14 D, 0.22±0.12 D; after surgery: 0.16±0.08 D,0.16±0.07 D; t=2.306, P=0.029; t=2.242, P=0.033). conclusions: After surgery, the accommodative ability of IXT patients improves, more stable accommodative microfluctuations and visual performance improved.

Key words： intermittent exotropia surgery accommodative response accomodative microfluctuations

Received: 11 February 2018

Fund:

International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (2014DFA30940)

Corresponding Authors: Hao Chen, Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China(Email: chenhao@mail.eye.ac.cn)

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Fan Gao
	Jinhua Bao
	Fang Zhang
	Hao Chen

Cite this article:

Fan Gao,Jinhua Bao,Fang Zhang等. The Impact of Surgery for Intermittent Exotropia on Accommodative Response and Microfluctuation[J]. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2018, 20(9): 536-540.

URL:

https://www.cjoovs.com/EN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2018.09.005 OR https://www.cjoovs.com/EN/Y2018/V20/I9/536

	S0002-9394(00)00623-1.
[1]	赵堪兴. 斜视弱视学. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2011: 85-86.
[2]	Kushner BJ, Morton GV. Distance/near differences in intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol, 1998, 116(4): 478-486.DOI: 10.1001/archopht.116.4.478.
[3]	Somer D, Demirci S, Çinar FG, et al. Accommodative ability in exotropia: Predictive value of surgical success. J AAPOS, 2007,11(5): 460-464. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.01.123.
[4]	Abroms AD, Mohney BG, Rush DP, et al. Timely surgery in intermittent and constant exotropia for superior sensory outcome. Am J Ophthalmol, 2001, 131(1): 111-116. DOI: 10.1016/
[5]	杨景存. 眼外肌病学. 郑州: 郑州大学出版社, 2003: 75-76.
	S0002-9394(00)00623-1.
[6]	牛兰俊. 实用斜视弱视学. 苏州: 苏州大学出版社, 2016: 333-334.
[7]	林仲, 张祎草, 刘洛如, 等．双眼开放视野自动验光仪的临床评价. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2012, 14(11): 679-683.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2012.11.010.
[8]	Le R, Bao J, Chen D, et al. The effect of blur adaptation on accommodative response and pupil size during reading. J Vis,2010, 10(14): 1-12. DOI: 10.1167/10.14.1.
[9]	龚露, 保金华, 邓军, 等. 近视眼在持续性近距离阅读时周边屈光状态的变化. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2010,12(2): 95-98. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.isn.1674-845X.2010.02.004.
[10]	保金华, 吴道雷, 陈浩. 近附加对近视眼调节反应及其微波动的影响. 温州医学院学报, 2013, 43(6): 360-362. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2138.2013.06.03.
[11]	Lin H, Drobe B, Jin W, et al. Effects of near addition lenses and prisms on accommodative microfluctuations in Chinese children. Optom Vis Sci, 2016, 93(5): 488-496. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000816.
[12]	王小娟, 赵堪兴. 间歇性外斜视的双眼调节功能. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2013, 15(8): 471-474. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2013.08.006.
[13]	Nakatsuka C, Hasebe S, Nonaka F, et al. Accommodative lag under habitual seeing conditions: Comparison between myopic and emmetropic children. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2005, 49(3): 189-194. DOI: 10.1007/s10384-004-0175-7.
[14]	徐丹, 姜俭, 阎静, 等. 近视性屈光参差者双眼调节反应的研究. 中华眼科杂志, 2009, 45(7): 612-615. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2009.07.007.
[15]	Subbaram MV, Bullimore MA. Visual acuity and the accuracy of the accommodative response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2002,22(4): 312-318. DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00037.x.
[16]	Anderson HA, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, et al. Minus lens stimulated accommodative lag as a function of age. Optom Vis Sci, 2009, 86(6): 685-694. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a7294f.
[5]	杨景存. 眼外肌病学. 郑州: 郑州大学出版社, 2003: 75-76.
[17]	Heron G, Charman WN, Gray LS. Accommodation responses and ageing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1999, 40(12): 2872-2883.
[18]	Hasebe S, Nonaka F, Ohtsuki H. Accuracy of accommodation in heterophoric patients: Testing an interaction model in a large clinical sample. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2005, 25(6): 582-591.DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00331.x.
[19]	Goss DA, Rainey BB. Relationship of accommodative response and near point phoria in a sample of myopic children. Optom Vis Sci, 1999, 76(5): 292-294. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199905000-00016.
[20]	Tassinari JT. Monocular estimate method retinoscopy: Central tendency measures and relationship to refractive status and heterophoria. Optom Vis Sci, 2002, 79(11): 708-714. DOI:10.1097/00006324-200211000-00008.
[6]	牛兰俊. 实用斜视弱视学. 苏州: 苏州大学出版社, 2016: 333-334.
[7]	林仲, 张祎草, 刘洛如, 等．双眼开放视野自动验光仪的临床评价. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2012, 14(11): 679-683.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2012.11.010.
[8]	Le R, Bao J, Chen D, et al. The effect of blur adaptation on accommodative response and pupil size during reading. J Vis,2010, 10(14): 1-12. DOI: 10.1167/10.14.1.
[9]	龚露, 保金华, 邓军, 等. 近视眼在持续性近距离阅读时周边屈光状态的变化. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2010,12(2): 95-98. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.isn.1674-845X.2010.02.004.
[10]	保金华, 吴道雷, 陈浩. 近附加对近视眼调节反应及其微波动的影响. 温州医学院学报, 2013, 43(6): 360-362. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2138.2013.06.03.
[11]	Lin H, Drobe B, Jin W, et al. Effects of near addition lenses and prisms on accommodative microfluctuations in Chinese children. Optom Vis Sci, 2016, 93(5): 488-496. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000816.
[12]	王小娟, 赵堪兴. 间歇性外斜视的双眼调节功能. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2013, 15(8): 471-474. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2013.08.006.
[13]	Nakatsuka C, Hasebe S, Nonaka F, et al. Accommodative lag under habitual seeing conditions: Comparison between myopic and emmetropic children. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2005, 49(3): 189-194. DOI: 10.1007/s10384-004-0175-7.
[14]	徐丹, 姜俭, 阎静, 等. 近视性屈光参差者双眼调节反应的研究. 中华眼科杂志, 2009, 45(7): 612-615. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2009.07.007.
[15]	Subbaram MV, Bullimore MA. Visual acuity and the accuracy of the accommodative response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2002,22(4): 312-318. DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00037.x.
[16]	Anderson HA, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, et al. Minus lens stimulated accommodative lag as a function of age. Optom Vis Sci, 2009, 86(6): 685-694. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a7294f.
[21]	Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical management of binocuuclar vision: hetereophoric, accommodative and eye movement disorders.3rd ed. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins, 2008: 59-64,
[17]	Heron G, Charman WN, Gray LS. Accommodation responses and ageing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1999, 40(12): 2872-2883.
[18]	Hasebe S, Nonaka F, Ohtsuki H. Accuracy of accommodation in heterophoric patients: Testing an interaction model in a large clinical sample. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2005, 25(6): 582-591.DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00331.x.
[19]	Goss DA, Rainey BB. Relationship of accommodative response and near point phoria in a sample of myopic children. Optom Vis Sci, 1999, 76(5): 292-294. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199905000-00016.
[20]	Tassinari JT. Monocular estimate method retinoscopy: Central tendency measures and relationship to refractive status and heterophoria. Optom Vis Sci, 2002, 79(11): 708-714. DOI:10.1097/00006324-200211000-00008.
12	1-123.
[22]	Ha SG, Jang SM, Cho YA, et al. Clinical exhibition of increased accommodative loads for binocular fusion in patients with basic intermittent exotropia. BMC Ophthalmol, 2016, 16(1): 1-6. DOI:10.1186/s12886-016-0260-y.
[23]	Sharma P, Saxena R, Narvekar M, et al. Evaluation of distance and near stereoacuity and fusional vergence in intermittent exotropia. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2008, 56(2): 121-125. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.39116.
[24]	Van Der Heijde GL, Beers APA, Dubbelman M. Microf luctuations of steady-state accommodation measured with ultrasonography.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1996, 16(3): 216-221. DOI: 10.1016/0275-5408(95)00051-8.
[25]	Xu J, Zheng Z, Drobe B, et al. The effects of spatial frequency on the accommodation responses of myopes and emmetropes under various detection demands. Vision Res, 2015, 115(Pt A):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.05.020.
[26]	Charman WN, Heron G. Fluctuations in accommodation: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1988, 8(2): 153-164. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01031.x.
[27]	Day M, Strang NC, Seidel D, et al. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2006, 26(1): 88-96. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00347.x.
[21]	Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical management of binocuuclar vision: hetereophoric, accommodative and eye movement disorders.3rd ed. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins, 2008: 59-64,
12	1-123.
[22]	Ha SG, Jang SM, Cho YA, et al. Clinical exhibition of increased accommodative loads for binocular fusion in patients with basic intermittent exotropia. BMC Ophthalmol, 2016, 16(1): 1-6. DOI:10.1186/s12886-016-0260-y.
[23]	Sharma P, Saxena R, Narvekar M, et al. Evaluation of distance and near stereoacuity and fusional vergence in intermittent exotropia. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2008, 56(2): 121-125. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.39116.
[24]	Van Der Heijde GL, Beers APA, Dubbelman M. Microf luctuations of steady-state accommodation measured with ultrasonography.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1996, 16(3): 216-221. DOI: 10.1016/0275-5408(95)00051-8.
[25]	Xu J, Zheng Z, Drobe B, et al. The effects of spatial frequency on the accommodation responses of myopes and emmetropes under various detection demands. Vision Res, 2015, 115(Pt A):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.05.020.
[26]	Charman WN, Heron G. Fluctuations in accommodation: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1988, 8(2): 153-164. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01031.x.
[27]	Day M, Strang NC, Seidel D, et al. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2006, 26(1): 88-96. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00347.x.