|
|
Changes in Binocular Visual Function after SMILE |
Kaixuan Du, Xiaoying Wu, Dan Wen, Bayi Xiao, Shuangzhen Liu, Yewei Yin, Chenling Li, Shengfa Hu, Yanhui Tang |
Department of Ophthalmology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410008, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To investigate the effect of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) on binocular visual function and its clinical significance. Methods: In this prospective clinical study, 58 myopia patients (116 eyes) who completed the SMILE surgery at the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from March 2016 to October 2017 were selected. According to the degree of spherical equivalent (SE), patients were divided into a high myopia group (<-6.00 D) (40 eyes) and a mild-moderate myopia group (≥-6.00 D) (76 eyes). Based on the dominant eye, participants were divided into a dominant eye group (58 eyes) and a nondominant eye group (58 eyes). For all patients, accommodative and convergence function were measured before surgery and 1 week and 1 and 3 months after surgery. Repeated measures analysis of variance and independent t-tests were used to analyze and compare the data from the two groups. Results: ①The SEs of the two groups after 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months were lower than those before surgery (P<0.05). In the mild-moderate myopia group, the dominant eye amplitude of the postoperative accommodation and the positive relative accommodation were both larger than those before surgery (P<0.05). Binocular accommodative facility increased 1 month and 3 months after surgery (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in similar indicators between the high myopia group at each time point before or after surgery. There was no significant difference between the mild-moderate myopia group and the high myopia group in the amplitude of accommodation of the dominant and non-dominant eyes at each time point before and after surgery. ②There was no statistically significant difference between the preoperative mild-moderate myopia group and the high myopia group in near and distance phoria, NRV/PRV, and AC/A. The postoperative near-points in the low-moderate myopia group and the high myopia group increased compared with preoperative measurements (P<0.05). Conclusions: SMILE surgery has a positive effect on accommodative and convergence function in patients with mild-moderate myopia. For patients with high myopia, changes in postoperative binocular visual function are not obvious.
|
Received: 16 March 2019
|
Fund:Changsha Science and Technology Plan Project (kq1701079); Hunan Natural Science Foundation (2015JJ4093) |
Corresponding Authors:
Corresponding author: Xiaoying Wu, Department of Ophthalmology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410008, China (Email: hewuan@163.com)
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Liu T, Dan T, Luo Y. Small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: First 24-hour outcomes. J Ophthalmol, 2017, (2017)5824534. DOI: 10.1155/ 2017/5824534.
|
[2] |
Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, et al.Two-years results of small-incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 2017(2): 1-7. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13470.
|
[3] |
Torky MA, Alzafiri YA.Visual and refractive outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction in mild, moderate, and high myopia: Six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2017, 43(4): 459-465. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.015.
|
[4] |
Agca A, Demirok A, Yildirim Y, et al.Refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx) through a small incision (SMILE) for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: Current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol, 2016, 10: 1905-1912. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S80412.
|
[5] |
Chen M, Yu M, Dai J.Comparison of biomechanical effects of small incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis. Acta Ophthalmol, 2016, 94(7): e586-e591. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13035.
|
[6] |
Ganesh S, Brar S, Arra RR.Refractive lenticule extraction small incision lenticule extraction: A new refractive surgery paradigm. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2018, 66(1): 10-19. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_761_17.
|
[7] |
Zhu X, Zou L, Yu M, et al.Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia: A 1-year outcome. PloS one, 2017, 12(8): e0182251. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182251.
|
[8] |
陈世豪, 吕帆, 王勤美, 等. LASIK对近视眼调节功能的影响及其临床意义. 眼视光学杂志, 2000, 2(1): 26-29. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2000.01.007.
|
[9] |
Daniel F, Kapoula Z.Induced vergence-accommodation conflict reduces cognitive performance in the Stroop test. Scientific reports, 2019, 9(1): 1247. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37778-y.
|
[10] |
Li SM, Kang MT, Peng XX, et al.Efficacy of Chinese eye exercises on reducing accommodative lag in school-aged children: A randomized controlled trial. PloS One, 2015, 10(3): e0117552. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117552.
|
[11] |
Momeni-Moghaddam H, Goss DA, Sobhani M.Accommodative response under monocular and binocular conditions as a function of phoria in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. Clin Exp Optom, 2014, 97(1): 36-42. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12074.
|
[12] |
Zheng K, Han T, Zhou X.Accommodative changes after SMILE for moderate to high myopia correction. BMC Ophthalmol, 2016, 16(1): 173. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0352-8.
|
[13] |
周少博, 郭海科, 谭娟, 等. 近视眼LASIK术后调节灵洁度变化与视觉疲劳的关系. 眼科新进展, 2012, 32(3): 286-288.
|
[14] |
Cacho Martinez P, Garcia Munoz A, Ruiz-Cantero MT.Treatment of accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions: A systematic review. Optometry, 2009, 80(12): 702-716. DOI: 10.1016/j.optm.2009.06.011.
|
[15] |
马可, 刘陇黔. 青年人近视眼与各调节因素的关系. 眼视光学杂志, 2006, 8(2): 85-87. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X. 2006.02.005.
|
[16] |
任建涛, 姜雅琴, 黄旭东. 高度近视并发白内障的视功能. 国际眼科杂志, 2013, 13(9): 1785-1788. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn. 1672-5123.2013.09.13.
|
[17] |
吴小影, 刘双珍. 近视患者准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后调节性集合与调节比值的变化. 中华眼科杂志, 2003, 39(3): 132-135. DOI: 10.3760/j:issn:0412-4081.2003.03.002.
|
[18] |
邓国涛, 贡雅洁. LASIK术后眼调节状态的改变及其与视疲劳的关系. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2012, 14(3): 169-172. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2012.03.011.
|
|
|
|