|
|
Calculation of Intraocular Lens Power in Cataract Patients with an Abnormal B/F Ratio based on Total Corneal Refractive Power |
Shiming Wang1 , Yan Wen2 , Zhigang He1 |
1 Xiangshan Aier Eye Hospital, Ningbo 315000, China 2 Chongqing Aier Eye Hospital, Chongqing 400000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To research the accuracy of an intraocular lens (IOL) refractive power calculation formula based on total corneal refractive power (TCRP) in calculating the IOL refractive power in cataract patients with an abnormal B/F ratio. Methods: This was a prospective clinically controlled study. Fifty-one cataract patients (51 eyes) with an abnormal corneal B/F ratio were selected consecutively. Patients were divided into two groups: A high B/F ratio group, B/F≥85%, 24 patients (24 eyes), mean=86.2±0.5%; alow B/F ratio group, B/F≤78%, 27 patients (27 eyes), mean=76.6±0.6%. The TCRP measured by the Pentacam (3 mm, pupil center, zone), the axial length (AL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by the IOL-Master 500 were used in the self-developed IOL refractive power calculation formula. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (logMaR) and optometric testing with a computer were performed 3 months after surgery. Results: The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) at 3 months after surgery was 0.19±0.09 in the high B/F ratio group and 0.19±0.08 in the low B/F ratio group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.787, P=0.435). The mean absolute error (MAE) at 3 months after surgery was 0.38±0.16 D in the high B/F ratio group and 0.42±0.19 D in the low B/F ratio group. Three months after surgery, the MAEs of all patients calculated by the TCRP Method, Higis, HofferQ, SRK-T, and Hollady-Ⅰ formulas were 0.40±0.17 D, 0.64±0.25 D, 0.73±0.27 D, 0.98±0.32 D and 0.84±0.25 D, respectively. The differences in the absolute prediction error (APE) of the five formulas were statistically significant (χ2 =12.47, P=0.023). Furthermore, the APE of the TCRP Method was compared with the Haigis, Hoffer-Q, SRK-T, and Holladay-Ⅰ formulas, and the differences were statistically significant (Z=2.97, 3.53, 4.01, 3.75, all P<0.05). The overall comparisons of the five formulas of the APE were statistically significant for the high B/F ratio group and low B/F ratio group: (χ2 =12.35, P=0.037; χ2 =13.21, P=0.025). Conclusions: For cataract patients with an abnormal B/F ratio, the accuracy of the conventional IOL refractive power calculation formula is poor, and the TCRP-based IOL refractive power calculation formula has high accuracy and perfect UCDVA.
|
Received: 22 April 2019
|
Fund: Science Research Foundation of Aier Eye Hospital Group (AF1602D1) |
Corresponding Authors:
Shiming Wang, Xiangshan Aier Eye Hospital, Ningbo 315000, China (Email: wsm1981711@163.com)
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1990, 16(3): 333-340. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350 (13)80705-5.
|
[2] |
Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, et al. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1988, 14(1): 17-24.
|
[3] |
Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: A comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1993, 19(6): 700-712.
|
[4] |
Hoffer KJ. Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2000, 26(8): 1233-1237.
|
[5] |
Hoffer KJ, Aramberri J, Haigis W, et al. Protocols for studies of intraocular lens formula accuracy. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015, 160(3): 403-405.e1.
|
[6] |
Olsen T. Theoretical approach to intraocular lens calculation using Gaussian optics. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1987, 13(2): 141-145. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(87)80128-1.
|
[7] |
Lim KL, Fam HB. Relationship between the corneal surface and the anterior segment of the cornea: An Asian perspective. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32(11): 1814-1819. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.022.
|
[8] |
Fam HB, Lim KL. Validity of the keratometric index: Large population-based study. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007, 33(4): 686-691. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.11.023.
|
[9] |
Hua Y, Stojanovic A, Utheim TP, et al. Keratometric index obtained by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4): e0122441. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0122441.
|
[10] |
Wong CW, Ang M, Tsai A, et al. A Prospective Study of Biometric Stability After Scleral Buckling Surgery. Am J Ophthalmol, 2016, 165: 47-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.02.023.
|
[11] |
Tamaoki A, Kojima T, Hasegawa A, et al. Intraocular lens power calculation in cases with posterior keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2015, 41(10): 2190-2195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs. 2015.11.001.
|
[12] |
Del águila-Carrasco AJ, Domínguez-Vicent A, Pérez-Vives C, et al. Assessment of modifications in thickness, curvatures, and volume upon the cornea caused by disposable soft contact lens wear. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2015, 25(5): 385-390. DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000592.
|
[13] |
Gharaee H, Abrishami M, Abrishami M, et al. Anterior and posterior corneal curvature: normal values in healthy Iranian population obtained with the Orbscan Ⅱ. Int Ophthalmol, 2014, 34(6): 1213-1219. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-014-0005-y.
|
[14] |
Ang M, Chong W, Huang H, et al. Determinants of posterior corneal biometric measurements in a multi-ethnic Asian population. PLoS One, 2014, 9(7): e101483. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101483.
|
[15] |
Eom Y, Rhim JW, Kang SY, et al. Toric Intraocular Lens Calculations Using Ratio of Anterior to Posterior Corneal Cylinder Power. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015, 160(4): 717-724.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.011.
|
[16] |
Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Lomoriello DS, et al. Simulated keratometry versus total corneal power by ray tracing: A comparison in prediction accuracy of intraocular lens power. Cornea, 2017, 36(11): 1368-1372. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001343.
|
[17] |
Kim M, Eom Y, Lee H, et al. Use of the Posterior/Anterior Corneal Curvature Radii Ratio to Improve the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation: Eom's Adjustment Method. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2018, 59(2): 1016-1024. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-22405.
|
[18] |
Alnawaiseh M, Zumhagen L, Rosentreter A, et al. Intraocular lens power calculation using standard formulas and ray tracing after DMEK in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. BMC Ophthalmol, 2017, 17(1): 152. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0547-7.
|
[19] |
Jin H, Auffarth GU, Guo H, et al. Corneal power estimation for intraocular lens power calculation after corneal laser refractive surgery in Chinese eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2012, 38(10): 1749-1757. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.06.048.
|
[20] |
杨应琴, 王卫群, 田英, 等. LASIK术后Sirius光线追踪法与IOLMaster法测量人工晶状体度数比较. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2016, 18(6): 363-367, 372. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2016.06.009.
|
[21] |
金海鹰, 郭海科, Gerd U Auffarth, 等. 光路追迹法计算角膜屈光手术后人工晶状体的屈光力. 眼科研究, 2010, 28(4): 356-
|
35 |
9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0808.2010.04.018.
|
|
|
|