|
|
Analysis of the Accommodative Ability in Pediatric Patients with Intermittent Exotropia Concomitant after Surgery |
Lili Guo, Lejin Wang |
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital; Eye Disease and Optometry Institute;Beijing Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Therapy of Retinal and Choroid Diseases; College of Optometry,Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100062, China |
|
|
Guide |
|
Abstract Objective:To investigate accommodative ability in pediatric patients with intermittent exotropia concomitant after surgery.Methods:Twenty-four pediatric patients with intermittent exotropia were recruited for a prospective study at the Eye Center, People's Hospital, Peking University, from September 2020 to December 2020. Binocular and monocular accommodative facility was tested using a ±2.00 diopter (D)flip. Accommodative responses and negative/positive relative accommodation under binocular viewing conditions at 40 cm were tested. The evaluation parameters were measured before surgery and 1 and 3 months after surgery. The data were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA.Results:The binocular accommodative response was 0.28±0.24 D 3 months after surgery compared to 0.08±0.24 D before surgery, the former was signi?cant higher than the latter (95%CI: 0.033-0.363 D,P=0.015). The NRA was 2.46±0.39 D 3 months after surgery, which was signi?cantly higher than that before surgery, which was 2.17±0.36 D (95%CI: 0.012-0.571 D,P=0.039). The PRA before surgery was-2.08±0.95 D,-2.56±1.14 D and -3.13±1.65 D, respectively, at 1 and 3 months after surgery. The PRA before surgery was signi?cant higher than the data 1 month after surgery (95%CI: 0.125-1.979 D,P=0.023). The binocular accommodative facility was 8.58±2.21 and 9.33±2.39 cycles per minute (cpm) at 1 and 3 months, respectively, after surgery. This was significantly higher than the data before surgery, which was 6.00±2.00 cpm [95%CI:1.485-3.681 cpm,P<0.001; 95%CI: 1.937-4.729 cpm,P<0.001]. The accommodative facility of the dominant eye 1 month after surgery was significant higher than the data before surgery (95%CI:1.644-3.523 cpm,P<0.001), which was the same as 3 months after surgery (95%CI: 3.665-6.085 cpm,P<0.001). The accommodative facility of the non-dominant eye before surgery was signi?cant higher than the data 1 month after surgery (95%CI: 1.019-2.898 cpm,P<0.001), which was the same as 3 months after surgery (95%CI: 3.915-6.335 cpm,P<0.001). The accommodative facility of the dominant eyes 1 month after surgery was also signi?cant higher than the data of the non-dominant eyes (95%CI: 0.130-2.537 cpm, P=0.031).Conclusions:The binocular vergence-accommodation system and the accommodative abilities of children with intermittent exotropia concomitant obviously improve after surgery.
|
Received: 19 April 2021
|
|
Fund: Capital Transformational Medicine Project (2018-2-4086) |
Corresponding Authors:
LejinWang, Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital; Eye Disease and Optometry Institute; Beijing Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Therapy of Retinal and Choroid Diseases; College of Optometry, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100062, China (Email:13911822021@163.com)
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Pan CW, Zhu H, Yu JJ, et al. Epidemiology of intermittent exotropia in preschool children in China. Optom Vis Sci, 2016, 93(1): 57-62. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000754.
|
[2] |
Chougule P, Kekunnaya R. Surgical management of intermittentexotropia: do we have an answer for all? BMJ Open Ophthalmol, 2019, 4(1): e000243. DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000243.
|
[3] |
沈品呈, 刘昱, 徐丹. 间歇性外斜视患者双眼视功能的研究 进展. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019, 21(3): 395-400. DOI: 10.3760/cma.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.05.014.
|
[4] |
Somer D, Demirci S, Çinar FG, et al. Accommodative ability in exotropia: Predictive value of surgical success. J AAPOS, 2007, 11(5): 460-464. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.01.123.
|
[5] |
杨景存. 眼外肌病学. 郑州: 郑州大学出版社, 2003: 75-76.
|
[6] |
戴薇, 付晶. 近视与间歇性外斜视交互影响的机制及关键临 床科学问题. 中国斜视与小儿眼科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 36-38. DOI: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1005-328X.2020.01.016.
|
[7] |
王小娟, 赵堪兴. 间歇性外斜视的双眼调节功能. 中华眼视光 学与视觉科学杂志, 2013, 15(8): 471-474. DOI: 10.3760/cma. J.ISSN.1674-845X.2013.08.006.
|
[8] |
李育, 王唯为, 张海峰. 间歇性外斜视患者双眼调节功能的 变化. 首都食品与医药, 2016, 23(16): 36-37. DOI: CNKI:SUN: YYSD.0.2016-16-017.
|
[9] |
Abroms AD, Mohney BG, Rush DP, et al. Timely surgery in intermittent and constant exotropia for superior sensory outcome. Am J Ophthalmol, 2001, 131(1): 111-116. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00623-1.
|
[10] |
Sharma P, Saxena R, Narvekar M, et al. Evaluation of distance and near stereoacuity and fusional vergence in intermittent exotropia. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2008, 56(2): 121-125. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.39116.
|
[11] |
Donahue SP, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, et al. A randomized trial comparing bilateral lateral rectus recession versus unilateral recess and resect for basic-type intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology, 2019, 126(2): 305-317. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ophtha.2018.08.034.
|
[12] |
García A, Cacho P, Lara F, et al. The relation between accommodative facility and general binocular dysfunction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2000, 20(2): 98-104. DOI: 10.1046/ j.1475-1313.2000.00478.x.
|
[13] |
王婷. 间歇性外斜视患者调节功能与集合功能的评价. 天津: 天津医科大学, 2012.
|
[14] |
林惠玲, 胡玉艳, 徐昕頔, 等. 间歇性外斜视的调节灵活度和 调节反应. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2018, 20(5): 265- 268. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2018.05.003.
|
[15] |
Quick MW, Newbern JD, Boothe RG. Natural strabismus in monkeys: accommodative errors assessed by photorefraction and their relationship to convergence errors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1994, 35(12): 4069-4079. DOI: 10.1007/BF00171387.
|
[16] |
Cacho P, García A, Lara F, et al. Diagnostic signs of accommodative insufficiency. Optom Vis Sci, 2002, 79(9): 614-620. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200209000-00013
|
|
|
|