Zernike polynomial analysis of corneal tomography and anterior andposterior corneal topography in the diagnosis of keratoconus
CUI Lele1,LI Ming1,SHEN Meixiao1,CHEN Shihao1,XU Zhe1,LI Weibo2,LU Fan1.
1. School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China; 2. School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
Objective To analyze corneal tomography and anterior and posterior corneal topography by Zernike polynomial fitting in the diagnosis of keratoconus. Methods Keratoconus patients (n=20, 30 eyes) and normal subjects (n=30, 30 eyes) were recruited for this case-controlled study. The Pentacam system was used to gather pachymetry data of the entire cornea and the elevations of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces. Zernike polynomial fitting was used to quantify the 3D distribution of the corneal anterior and posterior surface elevations and thickness to obtain the root mean square (RMS) values for 2nd to 7th order and the higher-order aberration (HOA). Statistical analysis methods included independent samples t-test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results The 2nd to 7th order and the HOA RMSs of the anterior and posterior surface elevation and pachymetry were significantly different in the keratoconus patients compared to the normal subjects (P<0.001). Among the corneal anterior surface elevation and pachymetry parameters, the 3rd, 5th, and HOA RMSs had high diagnostic accuracy. The areas under the ROC curves for anterior surface elevation were 0.999, 0.982, 0.994, and for pachymetry they were 0.993, 0.989, 0.992. The 3rd, 5th, 7th, and HOA higher-order RMSs of the corneal posterior surface elevation also had high diagnostic accuracy. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.997, 0.991, 0.993, 0.981. Among these parameters, the 3rd RMS for the corneal posterior surface elevation had the highest diagnostic accuracy with an area under the ROC curve of almost 1.000. Conclusion Based on Pentacam images to assess the characteristics of the entire corneal topography and tomography, the Zernike polynomial application, especially the 3rd RMS values, had good accuracy in the diagnosis of keratoconus.
崔乐乐,李明,沈梅晓,陈世豪,许哲,黎伟波,吕帆. Zernike多项式分析全角膜前后表面和厚度三维不规则分布在圆锥角膜诊断中的价值[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2017, 19(5): 285-290.
CUI Lele1,LI Ming1,SHEN Meixiao1,CHEN Shihao1,XU Zhe1,LI Weibo2,LU Fan1.. Zernike polynomial analysis of corneal tomography and anterior andposterior corneal topography in the diagnosis of keratoconus. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2017, 19(5): 285-290. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2017.05.006
Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1986, 101(3): 267-273.
[2]
Smadja D, Touboul D, Cohen A, et al. Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2013, 156(2): 237-246.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.034.
[3]
Bühren J, Schäffeler T, Kohnen T. Validation of metrics for the detection of subclinical keratoconus in a new patient collective[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2014, 40(2): 259-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.044.
[4]
de Sanctis U, Missolungi A, Mutani B, et al. Graft central thickness measurement by rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry after penetrating keratoplasty[J]. Ophthalmology, 2007, 114(8): 1461-1468. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.059.
[5]
Shetty R, Matalia H, Srivatsa P, et al. A novel zernike application to differentiate between three-dimensional corneal thickness of normal corneas and corneas with keratoconus[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015, 160(3): 453-462.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.06.001.
Amsler M. Keratocone classique et keratocone fruste: arguments uni-taires[J]. Ophthalmologica, 1946, 111(2-3): 96-101.
[8]
Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ, et al. Epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness in keratoconus: three-dimensional display with artemis very-high frequency digital ultrasound[J]. J Refract Surg, 2010, 26(4): 259-271. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X- 20100218-01.
[9]
Ambrósio R, Alonso RS, Luz A, et al. Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32(11): 1851-1859. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.06.025.
[10]
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, et al. Stromal thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound[J]. J Refract Surg, 2009, 25(9): 776-786. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090813-04.
[11]
Mahmoud AM, Roberts CJ, Lembach RG, et al. CLMI: the cone location and magnitude index[J]. Cornea, 2008, 27(4): 480- 487. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31816485d3.
[12]
Mahmoud AM, Nuñez MX, Blanco C, et al. Expanding the cone location and magnitude index to include corneal thickness and posterior surface information for the detection of keratoconus[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2013, 156(6): 1102-1111. DOI: 10.1016/j. ajo.2013.07.018.
[13]
Saad A, Gatinel D. Evaluation of total and corneal wavefront high order aberrations for the detection of forme fruste keratoconus[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012, 53(6): 2978- 2992. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8803.
[14]
Bühren J, Kook D, Yoon G, et al. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010, 51(7): 3424-3432. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4960.
[15]
Gatinel D, Racine L, Hoang-Xuan T. Contribution of the corneal epithelium to anterior corneal topography in patients having myopic photorefractive keratectomy[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007, 33(11): 1860-1865. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.041.
[16]
Bühren J, Kühne C, Kohnen T. Defining subclinical keratoconus using corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2007, 143(3): 381-389. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.11. 062.
[17]
Gherghel D, Hosking SL, Mantry S, et al. Corneal pachymetry in normal and keratoconic eyes: Orbscan II versus ultrasound[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(6): 1272-1277. DOI: 10. 1016/j.jcrs.2003.11.049.
[18]
Reinstein DZ, Archer T. Combined Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound-assisted transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy and wavefront-guided treatment following multiple corneal refractive procedures[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32(11): 1870-1876. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.07.016.
[19]
Silverman RH, Urs R, Roychoudhury A, et al. Epithelial remodeling as basis for machine-based identification of keratoconus[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(3): 1580-1587. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12578.