基于双通道技术的视觉质量分析系统在评估轻度圆锥角膜视觉质量中的应用

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.12.004

摘要
图/表
参考文献(26)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF 742KB HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

探讨视觉质量分析系统（OQAS）测量圆锥角膜眼与正常角膜眼之间视觉质量的差异。方法：横断面研究。选取正常角膜屈光不正患者32例（32眼）作为对照组，圆锥角膜患者27例（27眼）作为圆锥角膜组。采用OQAS测量每组在3、4、5 mm的人工瞳孔直径下的视觉质量参数调制传递函数截止频率（MTFcutoff）、Strehl比、不同对比度下的OQAS值（OV-100、OV-20、OV-9），组间差异采用独立样本t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验，组内差异采用重复测量资料方差分析及Bonferroni校正。结果：圆锥角膜组在人工瞳孔分别为3、4、5 mm时的MTFcutoff、Strehl比、OV-100、OV-20、OV-9均低于对照组（3 mm：t=6.658、6.695、6.660、6.493、6.778；4 mm：t=7.106、6.567、7.109、6.802、6.788； 5 mm：t=6.148、7.254、6.158、6.446、7.210；P均<0.001）。对照组及圆锥角膜组内MTFcutoff、Strehl比、 OV-100、OV-20、OV-9 在不同人工瞳孔大小的组内比较差异有统计学意义（对照组：F=42.205、 28.335、42.559、32.621、30.372；圆锥角膜组：F=15.732、11.533、15.625、13.870、10.495；均 P<0.001）。结论：双通道OQAS测量结果表明圆锥角膜的视觉质量较正常眼明显下降，圆锥角膜及正常眼的视觉质量均随着瞳孔增大而下降。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：圆锥角膜, 视觉质量, 瞳孔, 双通道

Abstract：

To analyze the difference in optical quality between a normal cornea and keratoconus using an optical quality analysis system (OQAS). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 32 normal eyes and 27 keratoconus eyes. Optical qualities were measured by OQAS. Modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTFcutoff), Strehl ratio and OQAS values (OV-100, OV-20, OV-9) in artificial pupil diameters of 3 mm, 4 mm and 5 mm were analyzed by independent t test or Mann-Whitney U test, the difference among groups was analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measurement and Bonferroni post hoc t test. Results: MTFcutoff, Strehl ratio and OQAS values of the keratoconus group in artificial pupil diameters of 3 mm, 4 mm and 5 mm were all lower than those of the control group (3 mm: t=6.658, 6.695, 6.660, 6.493, 6.778; 4 mm: t=7.106, 6.567, 7.109, 6.802, 6.788; 5 mm: t=6.148, 7.254, 6.158, 6.446, 7.210; all P<0.001). Both in the control group and in the keratoconus group, the MTFcutoff, Strehl ratio, OV-100, OV-20 and OV-9 varied from artificial pupil diameters (control group: F=42.205, 28.335, 42.559, 32.621, 30.372; keratoconus group: F=15.732, 11.533, 15.625, 13.870, 10.495; all P<0.001). Conclusions: The optical qualities of keratoconus measured by OQAS are worse than normal eyes. Both in keratoconus and normal eyes, the optical qualities decline as pupil size increases.

Key words： keratoconus optical quality pupil double-pass

收稿日期: 2019-01-14

基金资助:

温州市科技计划项目（Y20140396）

通讯作者: 陈世豪（ORCID：0000-0001-7646-8003），Email：chenle@rocketmail.com

引用本文:

张佳陈雍赵文雯吴陈伟许琛琛汪凌陈世豪. 基于双通道技术的视觉质量分析系统在评估轻度圆锥角膜视觉质量中的应用[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019, 21(12): 900-905. Jia Zhang, Yong Chen, Wenwen Zhao, Chenwei Wu, Chenchen Xu, Ling Wang, Shihao Chen. Objective Assessment of Optical Quality in Mild Keratoconus with a Double-Pass System. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2019, 21(12): 900-905. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.12.004

链接本文:

https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/ 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.12.004 或 https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/Y2019/V21/I12/900

[1]	Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol, 1998, 42(4): 297-319.
[2]	Xu CC, Xue T, Wang QM, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of a double-pass optical quality analysis device. PLoS One, 2015, 10(2): e117587. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117587.
[3]	Saad A, Saab M, Gatinel D. Repeatability of measurements with a double-pass system. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(1): 28- 33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.033.
[4]	Tomás J, Piñero DP, Alió JL. Intra-observer repeatability of optical quality measures provided by a double-pass system. Clin Exp Optom, 2012, 95(1): 60-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444- 0938.2011.00660.x.
[5]	Güell JL, Pujol J, Arjona M, et al. Optical Quality Analysis System: Instrument for objective clinical evaluation of ocular optical quality. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30(7): 1598-1599. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.031.
[6]	McMahon TT, Szczotka-Flynn L, Barr JT, et al. A new method for grading the severity of keratoconus: the Keratoconus Severity Score (KSS). Cornea, 2006, 25(7): 794-800. DOI: 10.1097/01. ico.0000226359.26678.d1.
[7]	Rasheed K, Rabinowitz YS, Remba D, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a classification scheme for corneal topographic patterns. Br J Ophthalmol, 1998, 82(12): 1401-1406. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.82.12.1401.
[8]	Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, et al. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea, 2015, 34(4): 359-369. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000408.
[9]	Li X, Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K, et al. Longitudinal study of the normal eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients. Ophthalmology, 2004, 111(3): 440-446. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.020.
[10]	Saad A, Gatinel D. Combining placido and corneal wavefront data for the detection of forme Fruste keratoconus. J Refract Surg, 2016, 32(8): 510-516. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20160523-01.
[11]	Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Ozulken K, et al. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2013, 39(9): 1348-1357. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jcrs.2013.03.023.
[12]	Ye C, Ng PK, Jhanji V. Optical quality assessment in normal and forme fruste keratoconus eyes with a double-pass system: a comparison and variability study. Br J Ophthalmol, 2014, 98(11): 1478-1483. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304494.
[13]	Leonard AP, Gardner SD, Rocha KM, et al. Double-pass retina point imaging for the evaluation of optical light scatter, retinal image quality, and staging of keratoconus. J Refract Surg, 2016, 32(11): 760-765. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20160728-02.
[14]	Anera RG, Castro JJ, Jiménez JR, et al. Optical quality and visual discrimination capacity after myopic LASIK with a standard and aspheric ablation profile. J Refract Surg, 2011, 27(8): 597-601. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20110303-01.
[15]	Pan AP, Wang QM, Huang F, et al. Correlation among lens opacities classification system Ⅲ grading, visual function index-14, pentacam nucleus staging, and objective scatter index for cataract assessment. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015, 159(2): 241- 247. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.025.
[16]	胡爱莲, 蔡啸谷, 万修华, 等. 干眼对视网膜成像质量的影响. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2015, 17(9): 533-537. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.09.005.
[17]	林志博, 黄芳, 潘安鹏, 等. 区域折射型多焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的临床研究. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2017, 19(8): 482-487. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X. 2017.08.006.
[18]	Martinez-Roda JA, Vilaseca M, Ondategui JC, et al. Optical quality and intraocular scattering in a healthy young population. Clin Exp Optom, 2011, 94(2): 223-229. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444- 0938.2010.00535.x.
[19]	Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Ifrah R, et al. Aberrations and topography in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and keratoconic eyes. Optom Vis Sci, 2012, 89(4): 411-418. DOI: 10.1097/OPX. 0b013e318249d727.
[20]	Bühren J, Kook D, Yoon G, et al. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010, 51(7): 3424-3432. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4960.
[21]	Naderan M, Jahanrad A, Farjadnia M. Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes. Int Ophthalmol, 2018, 38(4): 1565-1573. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0620-5.
[22]	Aksoy S, Akkaya S, Özkurt Y, et al. Topography and higher order corneal aberrations of the fellow eye in unilateral keratoconus, Turk J Ophthalmol, 2017, 47(5): 249-254. DOI: 10.4274/tjo. 45220.
[23]	乔利亚, 蔡啸谷, 万修华, 等. 应用双通道客观视觉质量分析系统与光线追踪波阵面像差系统分析正常人眼调制传递函数. 中华眼科杂志, 2015, 51(1): 20-25. DOI: 10.3760/cma. j.issn.0412-4081.2015.01.006.
[24]	Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Yanome K, et al. Effect of pupil size on optical quality parameters in astigmatic eyes using a double-pass instrument. Biomed Res Int, 2013, 2013: 124327. DOI: 10.1155/ 2013/124327.
[25]	Xu R, Kollbaum P, Thibos L, et al. Reducing starbursts in highly aberrated eyes with pupil miosis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2018, 38(1): 26-36. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12420.
[26]	Wang Y, Zhao K, Jin Y, et al. Changes of higher order aberration with various pupil sizes in the myopic eye. J Refract Surg, 2003, 19(2 Suppl): S270-274.