Inf luence of baseline Myopic refraction on Myopia control in Youngsters Wearing Orthokeratology Lenses
Jie Zheng ,Yu Zhang,Yueguo Chen,Chun Zhang
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing He Ping Li Hospital, Beijing 100013, China
Objective: To evaluate the influence of baseline myopic refraction on controlling the development of myopia using orthokeratology in youngsters. Methods: This was a binocular self-control and case control study. A retrospective analysis of anisomyopic youngsters at Peking University Third Hospital was conducted from January 2009 to December 2017. Patients who wore orthokeratology lenses or spectacles in both eyes were recruited. Forty-nine youngsters (9-17 years old) who wore orthokeratology lenses were enrolled in the experimental group and 32 youngsters who wore spectacles were enrolled in the control group. The more myopic eye of each youngster was assigned to the experimental or control group Max and the less myopic eye of each youngster was assigned to experimental or control group Min.Refraction, corneal topography and axial length were measured at baseline and at the one-year visit.Data were analyzed with t test and Wilcoxon sign-rank test. results: The mean spherical equivalence was -5.00±1.53 D and -3.06±1.60 D for the eyes in the experimental groups Max and Min, respectively(t=-20.593, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in corneal curvature, corneal astigmatism,corneal E value, corneal thickness or pupil diameter between the two subgroups. The mean baseline spherical equivalence was -5.05±1.43 D for the eyes in control group Max, and -2.81(-2.00, -4.38)D for eyes in control group Min (Z=-4.952, P<0.001). Axial length elongation was 0.03±0.14 mm in experimental group Max and 0.12±0.16 mm in experimental group Min at the one-year visit and the difference was statistically significant (t=-4.217, P<0.001). The median axial length elongation of eyes in control groups Max and Min was 0.49(0.07, 0.75)mm and 0.40(0.17, 0.50)mm (Z=-0.510, P=0.610),respectively. The mean interocular difference in axial length at the one-year visit (0.63±0.35 mm) was less than that at baseline (0.72±0.34 mm) (t=-4.217, P<0.001). In the control group, the mean interocular difference in axial length was 0.74±0.38 mm at baseline, and the median interocular difference in axial length was 0.83(0.38, 1.07)mm at the one-year visit but the difference was not statistically significant (Z=-0.510, P=0.610). conclusions: A higher baseline myopic refraction can facilitate the effect of orthokeratology to slow axial growth in myopic youngsters.
郑杰,张钰,陈跃国,张纯. 基线近视屈光度对角膜塑形镜控制青少年儿童近视进展的影响[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2018, 20(10): 582-587.
Jie Zheng,Yu Zhang,Yueguo Chen,Chun Zhang. Inf luence of baseline Myopic refraction on Myopia control in Youngsters Wearing Orthokeratology Lenses. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2018, 20(10): 582-587. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2018.10.002
Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS, et al. The epidemics of myopia: Aetiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2018,62: 134-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004.
[2]
Ikuno Y. Overview of the complications of high myopia. Retina,2017, 37(12): 2347-2351. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001489.
[3]
Chen SJ, Lu P, Zhang WF, et al. High myopia as a risk factor in primary open angle glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol, 2012, 5(6):750-753. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.06.18.
[4]
Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet, 2012,379(9827): 1739-1748. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4.
[6]
González-Méijome JM, Faria-Ribeiro MA, Lopes-Ferreira DP,et al. Changes in peripheral refractive profile after orthokeratology for different degrees of myopia. Curr Eye Res,
Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of myopia in orthokeratology(ROMIO) study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012, 53(11): 7077-7085. DOI: 10.1167/
[5]
Santodomingo-Rubido J, Villa-Collar C, Gilmartin B, et al.Myopia control with orthokeratology contact lenses in Spain:refractive and biometric changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,
Kakita T, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Influence of overnight orthokeratology on axial elongation in childhood myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011, 52(5): 2170-2174. DOI: 10.1167/
[6]
González-Méijome JM, Faria-Ribeiro MA, Lopes-Ferreira DP,et al. Changes in peripheral refractive profile after orthokeratology for different degrees of myopia. Curr Eye Res,
Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of myopia in orthokeratology(ROMIO) study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012, 53(11): 7077-7085. DOI: 10.1167/
iovs.10-5485.
[11]
Charm J, Cho P. High myopia-partial reduction ortho-k: a 2-year randomized study. Optom Vis Sci, 2013, 90(6): 530-539. DOI:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318293657d.
[12]
Santodomingo-Rubido J, Villa-Collar C, Gilmartin B, et al.Factors preventing myopia progression with orthokeratology correction. Optom Vis Sci, 2013, 90(11): 1225-1236. DOI:
Kakita T, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Influence of overnight orthokeratology on axial elongation in childhood myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011, 52(5): 2170-2174. DOI: 10.1167/
10
1097/OPX.0000000000000034.
[13]
Wang B, Naidu RK, Qu X. Factors related to axial length elongation and myopia progression in orthokeratology practice.PLoS One, 2017, 12(4): e0175913. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0175913.
[14]
He M, Du Y, Liu Q, et al. Effects of orthokeratology on the progression of low to moderate myopia in Chinese children.BMC Ophthalmol, 2016, 16(1): 126. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0302-5.
[15]
Sun Y, Xu F, Zhang T, et al. Orthokeratology to control myopia progression: a meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4): e0124535.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124535.
iovs.10-5485.
[11]
Charm J, Cho P. High myopia-partial reduction ortho-k: a 2-year randomized study. Optom Vis Sci, 2013, 90(6): 530-539. DOI:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318293657d.
[12]
Santodomingo-Rubido J, Villa-Collar C, Gilmartin B, et al.Factors preventing myopia progression with orthokeratology correction. Optom Vis Sci, 2013, 90(11): 1225-1236. DOI:
[16]
Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, et al. Long-term effect of overnight orthokeratology on axial length elongation in childhood myopia: a 5-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci, 2012, 53(7): 3913-3919. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8453.
10
1097/OPX.0000000000000034.
[13]
Wang B, Naidu RK, Qu X. Factors related to axial length elongation and myopia progression in orthokeratology practice.PLoS One, 2017, 12(4): e0175913. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0175913.
[14]
He M, Du Y, Liu Q, et al. Effects of orthokeratology on the progression of low to moderate myopia in Chinese children.BMC Ophthalmol, 2016, 16(1): 126. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0302-5.
[15]
Sun Y, Xu F, Zhang T, et al. Orthokeratology to control myopia progression: a meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4): e0124535.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124535.
[17]
Fu AC, Chen XL, Lv Y, et al. Higher spherical equivalent refractive errors is associated with slower axial elongation wearing orthokeratology. Cont Lens Anter Eye, 2016, 39(1): 62.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae. 2015.07.006.
[18]
Smith MJ, Walline JJ. Controlling myopia progression in children and adolescents. Adolesc Health Med Ther, 2015, 6:133-140. DOI: 10.2147/AHMT.S55834.
[16]
Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, et al. Long-term effect of overnight orthokeratology on axial length elongation in childhood myopia: a 5-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci, 2012, 53(7): 3913-3919. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8453.
Zhu MJ, Feng HY, He XG, et al. The control effect of orthokeratology on axial length elongation in Chinese children with myopia. BMC Ophthalmol, 2014, 14(1): 141. DOI: 10.
[17]
Fu AC, Chen XL, Lv Y, et al. Higher spherical equivalent refractive errors is associated with slower axial elongation wearing orthokeratology. Cont Lens Anter Eye, 2016, 39(1): 62.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae. 2015.07.006.
[18]
Smith MJ, Walline JJ. Controlling myopia progression in children and adolescents. Adolesc Health Med Ther, 2015, 6:133-140. DOI: 10.2147/AHMT.S55834.
11
86/1471-2415-14-141.
[21]
Lum E. Progressive anisometropia and orthokeratology: a case report. Clin Exp Optom, 2018, 101(4): 599-600. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12542.
Zhu MJ, Feng HY, He XG, et al. The control effect of orthokeratology on axial length elongation in Chinese children with myopia. BMC Ophthalmol, 2014, 14(1): 141. DOI: 10.
[22]
Deng L, Gwiazda J, Manny RE, et al. Limited change in anisometropia and aniso-axial length over 13 years in myopic children enrolled in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(4): 2097-2105. DOI:10.1167/iovs.13-13675.
[23]
Tong L, Chan YH, Gazzard G, et al. Longitudinal study of anisometropia in Singaporean school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006, 47(8): 3247-3252. DOI: 10.1167/
11
86/1471-2415-14-141.
[21]
Lum E. Progressive anisometropia and orthokeratology: a case report. Clin Exp Optom, 2018, 101(4): 599-600. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12542.
iovs.05-0906.
[24]
Zedan RH, El-Fayoumi D, Awadein A. Progression of high anisometropia in children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus,2017, 54(5): 282-286. DOI: 10.3928/01913913-20170320-06.
[22]
Deng L, Gwiazda J, Manny RE, et al. Limited change in anisometropia and aniso-axial length over 13 years in myopic children enrolled in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(4): 2097-2105. DOI:10.1167/iovs.13-13675.
[23]
Tong L, Chan YH, Gazzard G, et al. Longitudinal study of anisometropia in Singaporean school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006, 47(8): 3247-3252. DOI: 10.1167/
Zedan RH, El-Fayoumi D, Awadein A. Progression of high anisometropia in children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus,2017, 54(5): 282-286. DOI: 10.3928/01913913-20170320-06.