After corneal refractive surgery, the measurement of intraocular pressure is underestimated because central corneal thickness and corneal biomechanical properties are changed during the operation. Accurately evaluating intraocular pressure after corneal refractive surgery has an important clinical significance. The evaluation of postoperative intraocular pressure measurements should take tonometer, central corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factors into consideration. This article reviews the intraocular pressure measurements and influencing factors after corneal refractive surgery.
史策 夏丽坤. 角膜屈光术后眼压测量方法及影响因素的研究进展[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019, 21(4): 316-320.
Ce Shi, Likun Xia. Research Progress on Intraocular Pressure Measurements and Influencing Factors after Corneal Refractive Surgery. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2019, 21(4): 316-320. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.04.014
Chansue E, Tanehsakdi M,Swasdibutra S, et al. Efficacy, predictability and safety of small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE). Eye Vis (Lond), 2015, 2: 14. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-
01
5-0024-4.
[3]
Li Y, Shi J, Duan X, et al. Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2010, 248(12): 1765-1770. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-009-1243-y.
[4]
Wangsupadilok B, Horatanaruang O. The impact of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measured by noncontact onometry. J Med Assoc Thai, 2011, 94(5): 574-578.
Lee M, Ahn J. Effects of central corneal stromal thickness and epithelial thickness on intraocular pressure using goldmann applanation and non-contact tonometers. PLoS One, 2016,11(3): e0151868. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151868.
[7]
Schallhorn JM, Schallhorn SC, Ou Y. Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: A large population study.Ophthalmology, 2015, 122(3): 471-479. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.033.
[8]
Jethani J, Dave P, Jethani M, et al. The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes. Saudi J
Wei W, Fan Z, Wang L, et al. Correlation analysis between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in juveniles in Northern China: The Jinan city eye study. PLoS One, 2014, 9(8):e104842. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104842.
[10]
Cacho I, Sanchez-Naves J, Batres L, et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure before and after laser in situ keratomileusis refractive surgery measured with perkins tonometry, noncontact tonometry, and transpalpebral tonometry. J Ophthalmol, 2015,2015: 683895. DOI: 10.1155/2015/683895.
[11]
Elsheikh A, Joda A, Abass A, David Garway-Heath.Assessment of the ocular response analyzer as an instrument for measurement of intraocular pressure and corneal
Yildiz A, Yasar T. Comparison of Goldmann applanation, noncontact,dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results. Med Glas (Zenica), 2018,15(2): 152-157. DOI: 10.17392/960-18.
[14]
Özcura F, Y?ld?r?m N, Tambova E, et al. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus. J Optom, 2017, 10(2): 117-122. DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2016.04.005.
Yilmaz I, Altan C, Aygit ED, et al. Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL. Clin Ophthalmol, 2014, 8: 1069-1074. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S63915.
[17]
Güler M, Bilak ?, Bilgin B, et al. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects. J Glaucoma, 2015,24(8): 613-618. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000132.
Uzbek AK, Kamburo?lu G, Mahmoud AM, et al. Change in biomechanical parameters after flap creation using the Intralase femtosecond laser and subsequent excimer laser ablation. Curr Eye Res, 2011, 36(7): 614-619. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2010.546952.
Cheng AC, Fan D, Tang E, et al. Effect of corneal curvature and corneal thickness on the assessment of intraocular pressure using noncontact tonometry in patients after myopc LASIK surgery.Cornea, 2006, 25(1): 26-28.
[24]
Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Boehm AG, et al. A correction formula for the real intraocular pressure after LASIK for the correction of myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg, 2006, 22(3): 263-267.
[25]
Zare M, Feizi S, Azimzadeh A, et al. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C on corneal biomechanical features. Curr Eye Res, 2012, 37(6): 457-462. DOI: 10.3109/
02
713683.2012.660594.
[26]
Kamiya K,Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea, 2009,28(7): 765-769. DOI:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181967082.
Roberts CJ. Importance of accurately assessing biomechanics of the cornea. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2016, 27(4): 285-291. DOI:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000282.
Shin J, Kim TW, Park SJ, et al. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma, 2015, 24(3):195-201. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829da1ec.
[32]
Wei S, Wang Y, Wu D, et al. Ultrastructural changes and corneal wound healing after SMILE and PRK procedures. Curr Eye Res, 2016, 41(10): 1316-1325. DOI:10.3109/02713683.2015.1114653.
[33]
Xia L, Zhang J, Wu J, et al. Comparison of corneal biological healing after femtosecond LASIK and small incision lenticule extraction procedure. Curr Eye Res, 2016, 41(9): 1202-1208.DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1107590.
Li H, Wang Y, Dou R, et al. Intraocular pressure changes and relationship with corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FSLASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2016, 57(10): 4180-4186. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.16-19615.
[36]
Chen M, Yu M, Dai J. Comparison of biomechanical effects of small incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis. Acta Ophthalmol, 2016, 94(7): e586-e591. DOI:10.1111/aos.13035.
[37]
Dou R, Wang Y, Xu L, et al. Comparison of corneal biomechanical characteristics after surface ablation refractive surgery and novel lamellar refractive surgery. Cornea, 2015,
Mastropasqua L, Calienno R, Lanzini M, et al. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties modification after small incision lenticule extraction using Scheimpflug-based
noncontact tonometer. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014: 290619. DOI: 10.1155/2014/290619.
[39]
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK,LASIK,and small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg,2013, 29(7): 454-460. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130617-03.
[40]
Fel A, Aslangul E, Le Jeunne C. Eye and corticosteroid's use.Presse Med, 2012, 41(4): 414-421. DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2012.02.001.
Sheppard JD, Comstock TL, Cavet ME. Impact of the topical ophthalmic corticosteroid loteprednol etabonate on intraocular pressure. Adv Ther, 2016, 33(4): 532-552. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0315-8.
[49]
Chaurasia SS, Luengo Gimeno F, Tan K, et al. In vivo real-time intraocular pressure variations during LASIK flap creation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010, 51(9): 4641-4645. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5228.
[50]
Cheng W, Liu L, Yu S, et al. Real-time intraocular pressure measurements in the vitreous chamber of rabbit eyes during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Curr Eye Res, 2018,43(10): 1260-1266. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1485949.