Research Progress of Customized Corneal Refractive Surgery
Yuwen Hsiao1, 2, Jibo Zhou1, 2
1 Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China 2 Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai 200011, China
Abstract：Customized corneal refractive surgery is the most widely used treatment to correct ametropia. It provides better postoperative visual acuity and visual quality comparing to traditional corneal refractive surgery, the follower only focus on correcting lower order aberrations but not the irregular cornea, and might bring out iatrogenic higher order aberrations, increasing night visual troubles and decreasing visual quality. Customized corneal refractive surgery was designed to consider correction of the irregular cornea, corneal thickness and patient demands. Customized corneal refractive surgery serves as the first correction of the ametropia and the enhancement to the previous refractive surgery with different indications and symptoms leads by irregular cornea or increased higher order aberrations. This review summarized the following characteristics of customized refractive surgery: The desingn principles, indications, clinical application, complications, surgical results and patient satisfaction.
Simon H, David TC, Lin JC, et al. Topography-guided laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2013, 24(4): 302-309. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283622a59.
Lin DT, Holland S, Tan JC, et al. Clinical Results of Topography-based Customized Ablations in Highly Aberrated Eyes and Keratoconus/Ectasia With Cross-linking.J Refract Surg, 2012, 28(11): S841-S848. DOI: 10.3928/1081597x- 20121005-06.
[6]
Hashmani S, Hashmani N, Haroon H, et al. Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Topography-guided Laser-assisted In Situ Keratomileusis in Virgin Eyes. Cureus, 2018, 10(1): e2131. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2131.
[7]
ElAwady HE, Ghanem AA, Saleh SM. Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: Comparative study of higher order aberrations. OphthalmicSurg Lasers Imaging, 2011, 42(4): 314-320.DOI: 10.3928/15428877-20110421-01.
[8]
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Carp GI, et al. Incidence and Outcomes of Optical Zone Enlargement and Recentration After Previous Myopic LASIK by Topography-Guided Custom Ablation. J Refract Surg, 2018, 34(2): 121-130. DOI: 10.3928/1081597x- 20171215-01.
Nattis A, Donnenfeld ED, Rosenberg E, et al. Visual and keratometric outcomes of keratoconus patients after sequential corneal crosslinking and topography-guided surface ablation: Early United States experience. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2018, 44(8): 1003-1011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.05.020.
[11]
Motwani M. Treatment of high myopia/myopic astigmatism with a combination of WaveLightContoura with LYRA protocol and wavefront-optimized treatment. Clin Ophthalmol, 2018, 12: 875-883. DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S157486.
[12]
Motwani M. Topographic-guided treatment of hyperopic corrections with a combination of higher order aberration removal with WaveLightContoura and wavefront-optimized hyperopic treatment. Clin Ophthalmol, 2018, 12: 1021-1029. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S162511.
[13]
Motwani M. The use of WaveLight (R) Contoura to create a uniform cornea: the LYRA Protocol. Part 1: the effect of higher-order corneal aberrations on refractive astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol, 2017, 11: 897-905. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S133839.
[14]
Moshirfar M, Shah TJ, SkanchyDF, et al. Comparison and analysis of FDA reported visual outcomes of the three latest platforms for LASIK: wavefront guided VisxiDesign, topography guided WaveLight Allegro Contoura, and topography guided Nidek EC-5000 CATz. Clin Ophthalmol, 2017, 11: 135-147. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S115270.
Xu W, Tao Y, Wang L, et al. Evaluation of Biomechanical Changes in Myopia Patients with Unsatisfactory Corneas After Femto Second-Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) Concurrent with Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Using Corvis-ST: Two-Year Follow-Up Results. Med SciMonit, 2017, 23(7): 3649-3656. DOI: 10.12659/msm.905493.
Sun MS, Zhang L, GuoN, et al. Consistent comparison of angle Kappa adjustment between Oculyzer and TopolyzerVario topography guided LASIK for myopia by EX500 excimer laser. Int J Ophthalmol, 2018, 11(4): 662-667. DOI: 10.18240/ ijo.2018.04.21.
[19]
Broderick KM, Sia RK, Ryan DS, et al. Wavefront-optimized surface retreatments of refractive error following previous laser refractive surgery: a retrospective study. Eye Vis(Lond), 2016, 3(1):3. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-016-0034-x.
[20]
Dausch D, Dausch B, Wottke M, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes in PRK with a standard and aspherical optimized profile: a full case analysis of 100 eyes with 1-year follow-up. Clin Ophthalmol, 2014, 8: 2251-2260. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH. S66608.
[21]
Stonecipher K, Parrish J, Stonecipher M. Comparing wavefrontoptimized, wavefront-guided and topography-guided laser vision correction: clinical outcomes using an objective decision tree. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2018, 29(4): 277-285. DOI: 10.1097/ ICU.0000000000000495.
[22]
Jun I, Kang DSY, Arba-MosqueraS, et al. Comparison between Wavefront-optimized and corneal Wavefront-guided Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in moderate to high astigmatism. BMC Ophthalmol, 2018, 18(1): 154. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-018-0827-x.
Cummings A, Durrie D, Gordon M, et al. Prospective Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Myopia Using the WaveLight Refractive Suite. J Refract Surg, 2017, 33(5): 322-328. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20160926-01.
[25]
Agarwal S, Thornell E, Hodge C, et al. Visual Outcomes and Higher Order Aberrations Following LASIK on Eyes with Low Myopia and Astigmatism. Open Ophthalmol J, 2018, 12(5): 84- 93. DOI: 10.2174/1874364101812010084.
[26]
Wilson SE, Ambrosio R. Computerized Corneal Topography and Its Importance to Wavefront Technology. Cornea, 2001, 20(5): 441-454. DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200107000-00001.
[27]
Alió JL, Pi?ero DP, Plaza Puche AB. Corneal wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy in patients with irregular corneas after corneal refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008, 34(10): 1727-1735. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.025.
[28]
Ryan DS, Sia RK, Rabin J, et al. Contrast Sensitivity After Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized PRK and LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism. J Refract Surg, 2018, 34(9): 590-596. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20180716-01.
[29]
Frings A, Intert E, Steinberg J, et al. Outcomes of retreatment after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2017, 43(11): 1436-1442. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08. 014.
Zheng H, Song L. Visual quality of Q-value-guided LASIK in the treatment of high myopia. Eye Sci, 2011, 26(4): 208-210, 216. DOI: 10.3969/g.issn.1000-4432.2011.04.005.
[35]
Tawfik A, Eid AM, Hasanen R, et al. Q-value customized ablation (custom-Q) versus wavefront optimized ablation for primary myopia and myopic astigmatism. Int Ophthalmol, 2014, 34(2): 259-262. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-013-9828-1.
[36]
Lim DH, Chung ES, Kim MJ, et al. Visual quality assessment after presbyopic laser in-situ keratomileusis. Int J Ophthalmol, 2018, 11(3): 462-469. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.03.17.
浙公网安备 33030202001892号