Abstract:Objective: To compare visual quality between topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in treating myopia and astigmatism. Methods: In this prospective non-randomized study, 60 patients (120 eyes) with myopia and astigmatism who wanted refractive surgery were selected in Changsha Aier Hospital from September 2018 to October 2018. The patients were allocated to either one of two groups according to each person's request. The topography-guided FS-LASIK (TOPO-G) group had 30 patients (60 eyes) and the FS-LASIK group had 30 patients (60 eyes). All patients were followed up for 3 months. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was measured 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after surgery. Spherical equivalent (SE) and cylinder diopter were measured 1 week and 3 months after surgery. Corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), modulation transfer function (MTF), index of surface variance (ISV), Q-values and Strehl ratio (SR) were measured 3 months after surgery. Repeated measures ANOVA, ANOVA and the Chi-square test were used to analyze and compare the data for the two groups. Results: One month and 3 months after surgery, UCVA in the TOPO-G group was better than that in the FS-LASIK group (t=-2.915, P=0.004; t=-3.377, P=0.001), but there were no significant differences between the two groups in the other periods. The SE in the FS-LASIK group at 3 months after surgery was higher than that in the TOPO-G group (t=2.004, P=0.047). The percentage of eyes with a cylinder diopter of 0 in the TOPO-G group was higher than that in the FS-LASIK group (76% vs. 51%, χ2 =8.154, P=0.004). More HOAs and spherical and coma aberrations were induced in the FS-LASIK group compared to the TOPO-G group at 3 months after surgery (t=-2.586, -2.133, -2.088, P<0.05). The MTFs were significantly higher in the TOPO-G group than in the FS-LASIK group at low spatial frequencies (5 cpd) (t=2.039, P=0.044). There were no significant differences in the MTFs at other spatial frequencies between the two groups. The ISV in the TOPO-G group was significantly lower than that in the FS-LASIK group (t=-2.123, P=0.036). There were also no significant differences in Q-values or SR between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared with FS-LASIK, topography-guided FS-LASIK surgery has better postoperative visual acuity, a better index of corneal surface variance, and better visual quality.
唐忞1,2 马代金2. 角膜地形图引导的FS-LASIK与常规FS-LASIK术后视觉质量比较[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2020, 22(6): 427-433.
Min Tang1, 2, Daijin Ma2. Comparison of Visual Quality after Topography-Guided FS-LASIK and FS-LASIK. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2020, 22(6): 427-433. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20190718-00202
Villa C, Gutiérrez R, Jiménez JR, et al. Night vision disturbances after successful LASIK surgery. Br J Ophthalmol, 2007, 91(8): 1031-1037. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.110874.
[2]
Toda I, Ide T, Fukumoto T, et al. Visual outcomes after LASIK using topography-guided vs. wavefront-guided customized ablation systems. J Refract Surg, 2016, 32(11): 727-732. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20160718-02.
[3]
Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Kus MM, et al. Experimental correction of irregular corneal astigmatism using topographybased flying-spot-mode excimer laser photoablation. Am J Ophthalmol, 1998, 125(2): 252-256. DOI: 10.1016/s0002- 9394(99)80102-0.
[4]
Holland S, Lin DT, Tan JC. Topography-guided laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2013, 24(4): 302-309. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283622a59.
Ahn JM, Choi BJ, Kim EK, et al. Three different aspheric treatment algorithms of laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy in patients with high myopia. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2013, 57(2): 191-198. DOI: 10.1007/s10384-012-0218-4.
Durrie D, Stulting RD, Potvin R, et al. More eyes with 20/10 distance visual acuity at 12 months versus 3 months in a topography-guided excimer laser trial: Possible contributing factors. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2019, 45(5): 595-600. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.008.
[9]
Fang LH, Wang Y, He XD. Theoretical analysis of wavefront aberration caused by treatment decentration and transition zone after custom myopic laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2013, 39(9): 1336-1347. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.020.
Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ. Coaxially sighted corneal light reflex versus entrance pupil center centration of moderate to high hyperopic corneal ablations in eyes with small and large angle kappa. J Refract Surg, 2013, 29(8): 518-525. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130719-08.
[12]
Arba MS, Verma S. Effects of torsional movements in refractive procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2015, 41(8): 1752-1766. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.017.
[13]
Tomita M, Watabe M, Yukawa S, et al. Supplementary effect of static cyclotorsion compensation with dynamic cyclotorsion compensation on therefractive and visual outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2013, 39(5): 752-758. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.030.
Febbraro JL, Koch DD, Khan HN, et al. Detection of static cyclotorsion and compensation for dynamic cyclotorsion in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(10): 1718-1723. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.019.
[16]
Davis WR, Raasch TW, Mitchell GL, et al. Corneal asphericity and apical curvature in children: A cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005, 6(46): 1899-1906. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0558.
Liu B, Chen W, Shao DW, et al. Using Laser Sight Astrapro Planner 2.2 Z software in corneal topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia with asymmetric corneal shape. Int J Ophthalmol, 2014, 7(3): 452-456. DOI: 10.3980/ j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.12.
[19]
Shetty R, Shroff R, Deshpande K, et al. A prospective study to compare visualoutcomes between wavefront-optimized and topography-guided ablation profiles in contralateral eyes with myopia. J Refract Surg, 2017, 33(1): 6-10. DOI: 10.3980/ j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.12.
Donate D, Tha?ron R. SMILE with low energy levels: Assessment of early visual and optical quality recovery. J Refract Surg, 2019, 35(5): 285-293. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20190416-01.