基于Pentacam对角膜屈光指数的评价

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20191205-00326

摘要
图/表
参考文献(23)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF 703KB HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：应用Pentacam测量角膜中央3 mm前表面曲率（Ra ）、后表面曲率（Rp）及中央角膜厚度（CCT），根据测量结果，探讨角膜屈光力及角膜屈光指数的计算方法。方法：系列病例研究。选取2017年2─10月在湘潭市中心医院和温州医科大学附属眼视光医院接受角膜屈光手术或白内障手术术前检查的患者419例（419眼）。术前采用Pentacam对眼前节进行检查，采集角膜中央3 mm Ra、RP及CCT 的相关数据，计算Ra与Rp比值（AP ratio）、角膜前表面屈光力（Ka ）以及后表面屈光力（Kp），按照厚透镜高斯光学公式计算角膜总屈光力（KGOF）及角膜屈光指数（Ncal）。采用配对样本t检验比较各种K 值之间的差异。结果：Pentacam测量所得Ra、Rp、Rsimk、CCT、SimK分别为（7.73±0.27）mm、（6.34± 0.24）mm、（7.73±0.27）mm、（537±33）μm、（43.65±1.52）D。AP ratio为1.220±0.026，角膜屈光指数 Ncal为1.328±0.001。结论：利用Pentacam测量角膜参数计算所得角膜屈光指数可以提高角膜总屈光力及角膜后表面屈光力预算的准确性。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ： Pentacam, 角膜屈光指数, 角膜屈光力

Abstract：Objective: To calculate the total corneal power and the keratometric index based on actual measurements of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces and the central corneal thickness by Pentacam and evaluate the accuracy of this keratometric index in estimating total and posterior corneal powers. Methods: This was a series case study. Four hundred and nineteen patients (a total of 419 eyes) who had undergone preoperative examination and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery or cataract surgery from February to October 2017 at the Xiangtan Central Hospital and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University were chosen for the study. The radius of the best-fit sphere for the anterior corneal surface (Ra) and posterior corneal surface (Rp), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were obtained. The ratio of Ra to Rp (AP ratio), anterior corneal power, posterior corneal power and keratometric index were calculated, and the total corneal power in each eye was calculated using the Gaussian optics formula. A paired-samples t-test was used to compare the difference in K values. Results: The means for Ra, Rp, Rsimk, CCT and SimK were 7.73±0.27 mm, 6.34±0.24 mm, 7.73±0.27 mm, 537±33 μm, and 43.65±1.52 D, respectively. The mean calculated AP ratio was 1.220±0.026. The mean calculated keratometric index (Ncal) was 1.328±0.001. Conclusions: The Pentacam-derived keratometric index improves the predictive accuracies of total and posterior corneal powers.

Key words： Pentacam keratometric index corneal power

收稿日期: 2019-12-05

通讯作者: 曹建雄（ORCID：0000-0001-9673-9990），Email：153045376@qq.com

引用本文:

曹建雄1 常平骏2 李瑾2 肖天林3. 基于Pentacam对角膜屈光指数的评价[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2020, 22(8): 596-601. Jianxiong Cao1,Pingjun Chang2,Jin Li2,Tianlin Xiao3. Evaluation of the Keratometric Index by the Pentacam. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2020, 22(8): 596-601. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20191205-00326

链接本文:

https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20191205-00326 或 https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/Y2020/V22/I8/596

[1]	陆勤康, 查桂平, 赖晓明, 等. 角膜屈光手术后人工晶状体度数的测算. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2015, 17(9): 554- 557. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.09.009.
[2]	刘晓敏, 黄钰森. 无病史资料的角膜屈光术后IOL度数测算方法的比较. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2017, 19(1): 53-57. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2017.01.010.
[3]	欧忠敏, 郭海科, 金海鹰, 等. 应用旋转 Scheimpflug照相系统对角膜参数的研究. 眼科研究, 2010, 28(5): 450-453. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0808.2010.05.020.
[4]	Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci, 2005, 82(10): 892-899. DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000180817.46312.0a.
[5]	Fam HB, Lim KL. Validity of the keratometric index: Large pop ulation study. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007, 33(4): 686-691. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.11.023.
[6]	Chen D, Lam AK. Intrasession and intersession repeatability of the Pentacam system on posterior corneal assessment in the normal human eye. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007, 33(3): 448- 454. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.11.008.
[7]	Shankar H, Taranath D, Santhirathelagan CT, et al. Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: Comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008, 34(1): 103-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.013.
[8]	Amano S, Honda N, Amano Y, et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography. Ophthalmology, 2006, 113(6): 937-941. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.063.
[9]	Dubbelman M, Van der Heijde GL. The shape of the anterior and posterior corneal surface of the ageing human cornea. Vision Res, 2006, 46(6-7): 993-1001. DOI: 10.1016/ j.visres.2005.09.021.
[10]	Ho JD, Tsai CY, Tsai RJ, et al. Validity of the keratometric index: Evaluation by the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008, 34(1): 137-145. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jcrs.2007.09.033.
[11]	Read SA, Collins MJ. Diurnal variation of corneal shape and thickness. Optom Vis Sci, 2009, 86(3): 170-180. DOI: 10.1097/ OPX.0b013e3181981b7e.
[12]	Atchison DA, Thibos LN. Optical models of the human eye. Clin Exp Optom, 2016, 99 (2): 99-106. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12352.
[13]	Tang M, Li Y, Avila M, et al. Measuring total corneal power before and after laser in situ keratomileusis with high speed optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32(11): 1843-1850. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.04.046.
[14]	Garner LF, Owens H, Yap MK, et al. Radius of curvature of the posterior surface of the cornea. Optom Vis Sci, 1997, 74(7): 496-498. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199707000-00016.
[15]	Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, et al. Agreement between Pentacam and videokeratography in corneal power assessment. J Refract Surg, 2009, 25(6): 534-538. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X- 20090512-07.
[16]	Dunne MC, Royston JM, Barnes DA. Normal variations of the posterior corneal surface. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh), 1992, 70(2): 255-261. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1992.tb04133.x.
[17]	Eryildirim A, Ozkan T, Eryildirim S, et al. Improving estimation of corneal refractive power by measuring the posterior curvature of the cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1994, 20(2): 129-131. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80151-4.
[18]	Husain SE, Kohnen T, Maturi R, et a1. Computerized videokeratography and keratometry in determining intraocular lens calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1996, 22(3): 362-366. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(96)80251-3.
[19]	Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX, et al. Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology, 1999, 106(4): 693-702. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90153-7.
[20]	Olsen T. On the calculation of power from curvature of the cornea. Br J Ophthalmol,1986, 70(2): 152-154. DOI: 10.1136/ bjo.70.2.152.
[21]	Holladay JT. Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1997, 23(9): 1356-1370. DOI: 10.1016/s0886- 3350(97)80115-0.
[22]	Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1990, 16(3): 333-340. DOI: 10.1016/s0886- 3350(13)80705-5.
[23]	Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: A comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1993, 19(6): 700- 712. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80338-0.