离体及活体念珠菌在共聚焦显微镜下的特征

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20200420-00160

摘要
图/表
参考文献(22)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF 5151KB HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

文章导读

摘要目的：应用活体激光共聚焦显微镜（IVCM）观察离体培养及活体状态下念珠菌孢子及假菌丝的典型特征，为念珠菌性角膜炎的早期诊断提供依据。方法：比对观察研究。收集2016年1月到2019年12月在山东第一医科大学附属眼科医院被诊断为念珠菌性角膜炎的26例（26眼）患者资料，同时取白色念珠菌和近平滑念珠菌进行实验室真菌培养，应用IVCM分别观察离体及活体状态下念珠菌孢子及假菌丝的典型形态。结果：离体与活体状态下念珠菌孢子均呈排列均匀的点状结构，形状类圆形，直径约2～5 μm，边界清晰；假菌丝呈高反光线状结构。活体状态下孢子反光明显增强，18眼呈分散排列点状强反光结构，11眼呈团雾状中强反光结构；假菌丝形态变异较大，2眼菌丝形体细长，5眼呈芽孢结构，可见分支，1眼呈高对比度的不规则细长短棒状，1眼可同时观察到不规则细长短棒状和芽孢结构。白色念珠菌假菌丝结构较细长，长度约20～150 μm，直径约2～10 μm，与母细胞连接处收缩呈缢痕；近平滑念珠菌假菌丝短粗，长度约30～100 μm，直径2～5 μm，部分可见高亮的分支芽孢结构。结论：念珠菌性角膜炎在IVCM下呈现典型的孢子和假菌丝结构，离体和活体状态下孢子形态较为一致，而假菌丝形态变异较大，IVCM可用于念珠菌性角膜炎的早期诊断。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：念珠菌, 孢子, 假菌丝, 角膜炎, 共聚焦显微镜

Abstract： Objective: To use in vivo laser confocal microscopy (IVCM) to observe the in vitro culture and living characteristics of candida spores and pseudohyphaes, and to provide abasis for the early diagnosis of candida keratitis. Methods: The data of 26 patients (26 eyes) who were diagnosed with candida keratitis in the Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from January 2016 to December 2019 was collected. At the same time, candida albicans and candida parapsilosis were taken for laboratory fungal culture, and the typical morphology of candida spores and pseudohyphae in vitro and in vivo were observed by IVCM. Results: Candidaspores in vitro and in vivo presented uniformly in the shape of round spots with a diameter of 2-5 μm and a clear boundary. Pseudohyphae have a highly reflective linear structure. The reflection of spores was significantly enhanced in vivo. Eighteen eyes showed a scattered arrangement of spot-like, strongly reflective structure, and 11 eyes showed a dense fog structure. The morphology of pseudomycelia varied greatly. The mycelia in 2 eyes were slender, the spore structure was present in 5 eyes, and branches were visible. In 1 eye, an irregular thin and long rod shape with high contrast was observed, and in another eye, an irregular thin and long rod shape and spore structure could be observed simultaneously. Candida albicans pseudohyphae were relatively slender, with a length of 20-150 μm and a diameter of 2-10 μm. Pseudohyphae of candida parapsilosis were short and thick, with a length of about 30-100 μm and a diameter of 2-5 μm. Part of the branch spore structure was highlighted. Conclusions: Candida keratitis showstypical spore and pseudohyphae structures with IVCM. The morphology of candida keratitis spores in vitro and in vivo are consistent with observations under IVCM, but the morphology of pseudohyphaes are relatively different. IVCM can be used for the early diagnosis of candida keratitis.

Key words： candidas spore pseudomycelial keratitis confocal microscopy

收稿日期: 2020-04-20

PACS:

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金项目（81870639、81900907）；国家自然科学基金重点项目（81530027）；泰山学者计划项目（20150215、201812150）

通讯作者: 亓晓琳（ORCID：0000-0003-4410-3178），Email：qinglianqxl@163.com

引用本文:

李晓凤张晓玉杜满张莉亓晓琳高华. 离体及活体念珠菌在共聚焦显微镜下的特征[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2020, 22(11): 809-814. Xiaofeng Li, Xiaoyu Zhang, Man Du, Li Zhang, Xiaolin Qi, Hua Gao. A Study of the Characteristics of Candida with In Vitro and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2020, 22(11): 809-814. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20200420-00160

链接本文:

https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20200420-00160 或 https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/Y2020/V22/I11/809

[1]	Kalkanci A, Ozdek S. Ocular fungal infections. Curr Eye Res, 2011, 36(3): 179-189. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2010.533810.
[2]	Satpathy G, Ahmed NH, Nayak N, et al. Spectrum of mycotic keratitis in north India: Sixteen years study from a tertiary care ophthalmic centre. J Infect Public Health, 2019, 12(3): 367-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2018.12.005.
[3]	McSwiney TJ, Knowles SJ, Murphy CC. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of Moraxella keratitis.?Br J Ophthalmol, 2019, 103(12): 1704-1709. DOI: 10.1136/ bjophthalmol-2018-313557.
[4]	Fontana L, Moramarco A, Mandarà E, et al. Interface infectious keratitis after anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clinical features and treatment strategies. A review. Br J Ophthalmol, 2019, 103(3): 307-314. DOI: 10.1136/ bjophthalmol-2018-312938.
[5]	Smith RJ, Maloney RK. Diffuse lamellar keratitis. A new syndrome in lamellar refractive surgery. Ophthalmology, 1998, 105(9): 1721-1726. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)99044-3.
[6]	Cruzat A, Qazi Y, Hamrah P. In vivo confocal microscopy of corneal nerves in health and disease. Ocul Surf, 2017, 15(1): 15- 47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2016.09.004.
[7]	Labbé A, Khammari C, Dupas B, et al. Contribution of in vivo confocal microscopy to the diagnosis and management of infectious keratitis. Ocul Surf, 2009, 7(1): 41-52. DOI: 10.1016/ s1542-0124(12)70291-4.
[8]	Vaddavalli PK, Garg P, Sharma S, et al. Role of confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of fungal and acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology, 2011, 118(1): 29-35. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ophtha.2010.05.018.
[9]	Chidambaram JD, Prajna NV, Larke NL, et al. Prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of the in vivo laser scanning confocal microscope for severe microbial keratitis. Ophthalmology, 2016, 123(11): 2285-2293. DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.009.
[10]	Qiu WY, Yao YF. Mycotic keratitis caused by concurrent infections of Exserohilummcginnisii and Candida parapsilosis. BMC Ophthalmol, 2013, 13(1): 37. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415- 13-37.
[11]	Takezawa Y, Shiraishi A, Noda E, et al. Effectiveness of in vivo confocal microscopy in detecting filamentous fungi during clinical course of fungal keratitis. Cornea, 2010, 29(12): 1346- 1352. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181cd3c84.
[12]	Chidambaram JD, Prajna NV, Palepu S, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy cellular features of host and organism in bacterial, fungal, and acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol, 2018, 190: 24-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.010.
[13]	Lee JH, Le VH, Lee S, et al. Two-photon microscopy of fungal keratitis-affected rabbit cornea ex vivo using moxifloxacin as a labeling agent. Exp Eye Res, 2018, 174:51-58. DOI: 10.1016/ j.exer.2018.05.018.
[14]	Chidambaram JD, Prajna NV, Larke N, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy appearance of Fusarium and Aspergillus species in fungal keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol, 2017, 101(8): 1119-1123. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309656.
[15]	Sedaghat MR, Hosseinpoor SS. Candida albicans interface infection after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2012, 60(4): 328-330. DOI: 10.4103/0301- 4738.98723.
[16]	Cruzat A, Pavan-Langston D, Hamrah P. In vivo confocal microscopy of corneal nerves: Analysis and clinical correlation. Semin Ophthalmol, 2010, 25(5-6): 171-177. DOI: 10.3109/ 08820538.2010.518133.
[17]	Byrd JA, Caldwell DY, Nisbet DJ. The identification of fungi collected from the ceca of commercial poultry. Poult Sci, 2017, 96(7): 2360-2365. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew486.
[18]	Le Q, Wu D, Li Y, et al. Early-onset candida glabrata interface keratitis after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Optom Vis Sci, 2015, 92(5): e93-96. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000565.
[19]	Lohse MB, Gulati M, Johnson AD, et al. Development and regulation of single- and multi-species Candida albicans biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2018, 16(1): 19-31. DOI: 10.1038/ nrmicro.2017.107.
[20]	Cruzat A, Pavan-Langston D, Hamrah P. In vivo confocal microscopy of corneal nerves: analysis and clinical correlation. Semin Ophthalmol, 2010, 25(5-6): 171-177. DOI: 10.3109/ 08820538.2010.518133.
[21]	Thomson DD, Wehmeier S, Byfield FJ, et al. Contact-induced apical asymmetry drives the thigmotropic responses of Candida albicans hyphae. Cell Microbiol, 2015, 17(3): 342-354. DOI: 10.1111/cmi.12369.
[22]	Ledbetter EC, Norman ML, Starr JK. In vivo confocal microscopy for the detection of canine fungal keratitis and monitoring of therapeutic response. Vet Ophthalmol, 2016, 19(3): 220-229. DOI: 10.1111/vop.12287.