Abstract: Objective: To investigate visual acuity in preschoolers and the application value of refractive screening with the Spot Vision Screener. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 5 866 preschool children in the Haidian District of Beijing were selected for noncycloplegic visual and refractive examinations. The visual acuity distribution was analyzed by the likelihood-ratio Chi-square test. The refractive results of children with normal vision were tested by a rank sum test. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to analyze the differences in refractive values and anisometropia for different age groups. A two-way comparison between any two groups was performed using a Wilcoxon rank test. Medians (Q1, Q3) were used to describe the distribution characteristics of each refraction and anisometropia. The cut-off points for refractive screenings were calculated by percentiles. Results: The respective incidences of visual abnormalities were 4.25% and 17.29% based on the two methods. The differences between different age groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The differences in spherical values, cylindrical values and spherical anisometropia values in children with normal vision were statistically significant among different age groups (P<0.05). Hyperopia and astigmatism values decreased as age increased. The values of spherical equivalent (SE), cylindrical anisometropia and SE variability were not statistically significant among different age groups (P>0.05). P2.5 and P97.5 of the spherical value and SE were 0 D, +1.50 D, -0.25 D, and +1.00 D, respectively. P5 for the cylinder value was -1.25 D. P95 for spherical and cylindrical anisometropia was 0.75 D. Conclusions: The Spot Vision Screener is considered a useful device in large-scale refractive screening work with children. The cut-off points of refractive screening and visual acuity can be used for referral.
Ransbarger KM, Dunbar JA, Choi SE, et al. Results of a community vision-screening program using the Spot photoscreener. JAAPOS, 2013, 17: 516-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.06.013.
[2]
Freedman H, Fundora A, Baker J, et al. Amblyopia elimination project: Pediatric medical home-based community vision screening. JAAPOS, 2019, 56(3): 146-150. DOI: 10.3928/01913913- 20190308-01.
Garry GA, Donahue SP. Validation of Spot screening device for amblyopia risk factors. JAAPOS, 2014, 18(5): 476-480. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.07.156.
[8]
Peterseim MM, Papa CE, Wilson ME, et al. The effectiveness of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting amblyopia risk factors. JAAPOS, 2014, 18(6): 539-542. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.07. 176.
[9]
Mendez MA, Arguello L, Martinez J, et al. Evaluation of the Spot Vision Screener in young children in Costa Rica. JAAPOS, 2015, 19(5): 441-444. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.08.002.
Mu Y, Bi H, Ekure E, et al. Performance of Spot Photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in Chinese pre-school and school age children Attending an Eye Clinic. PLos One, 2016, 11(2): e0149561.
Srinivasan G, Russo D, Taylor C, et al. Validity of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting vision disorders in children 6 months to 36 months of age. J AAPOS, 2019, 23(5): 278.e1-e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.06.008.
[15]
Barugel R, Touhami S, Samama S, et al. Evaluation of the Spot Vision Screener for children with limited access to ocular health care. JAAPOS, 2019, 23(3): 153.e1-e5. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jaapos.2018.09.012.