Objective To evaluate the prognosis and factors of vitrectomy for a traumatic macular hole. Methods A retrospective case study was performed on a consecutive series of 54 patients (54 eyes) who underwent vitrectomy for macular hole surgery. The postoperative anatomic closure status of the hole, visual acuity prognosis, and multiple factors related to prognosis, including preoperative visual acuity, duration of disease, size of the macular hole, and preoperative anterior or posterior segment complications, were analyzed. Data were analyzed with a paired t test and chi-square test. Results After surgery, 48(89%) traumatic macular hole eyes had closure; 6 eyes with traumatic macular holes eyes had joint results. The closure time was 20.6±10.1 days. Visual acuity (VA) increased in 28 eyes (52%). There was a significant difference between preoperative VA and postoperative VA (t=4.496, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in preoperative VA, duration of disease, or preoperative anterior segment complications between the two different VA prognosis groups. There were significant differences in macular hole size and preoperative posterior segment complications between the two different VA prognosis groups (χ2=6.006, 10.650, P<0.05). Conclusion Using vitrectomy is helpful for the prognosis of anatomy and function in traumatic macular hole patients, but the patients with preoperative posterior segment complications had a poor VA prognosis.
侯婧,姜燕荣. 玻璃体手术治疗外伤性黄斑裂孔的预后及影响因素[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2013, 15(1): 26-29.
HOU Jing,JIANG Yan-rong. An analysis of the prognosis and factors of vitrectomy for a traumatic macular hole. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2013, 15(1): 26-29. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2013.01.007
Krásnik V, Strmen P, Javorská L. Surgical treatment of traumatic macular holes. Cesk Slov Oftalmol,2002,58:84-88.
[2]
Johnson RN, McDonald HR, Lewis H, et al. Traumatic macular hole observations, pathogenesis, and results of vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology,2001,108:853-857.
Mizusawa Y, Ichibe M, Yoshizawa T, et al. Clinical evaluation of traumatic macular hole. Jpn Rev Clin Ophthalmol,1996,90: 790-792.
[5]
Tomii A, Ikeda N, Kurusu A, et al. Clinical course of traumatic macular hole. Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol,1999,53:1274-1278.
[6]
Yamashita T, Uemara A, Uchino E, et al. Spontaneous closure of traumatic macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol,2002,133:230-235.
[7]
Yanagiya N, Akiba J, Takahashi M, et al. Traumatic macular hole and posterior vitreous. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, 1995,99:1026-1029.
[8]
Delori F, Pomerantzeff O, Cox MS. Deformation of the globe under high-speed impact: its relation to contusion injuries. Invest Ophthalmol,1969,8:290-301.
[9]
Yokotsuka K, Kishi S, Tobe K, et al. Clinical features of traumatic macular holes. Rinsho Ganka,1991,45:1121-1124.
Imai M, Iijima H, Gotoch T, et al. Optical coherence tomography of successfully repaired idiopathic macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol,1999,128:621-627.
[13]
Ip MS, Backer BJ, Duker JS, et al. Anatomical outcomes of surgery for idiopathic macular hole as determined by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol,2002,120:29-35.
[14]
Takahashi H, Kishi S. Tomographic features of early macular hole closure after vitreous surgery. Am J Ophthalmology,2000, 130:192-196.