Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus (FK506) and dexamethasone in the treatment of nonspecific keratitis in rats induced by alkali burn. Methods A total of 24 rats were randomly divided into four groups in this experimental study: group A (PBS, n=6), group B (dexamethasone, n=6), group C (tacrolimus, n=6) and a control group (no treatment, n=4). Biomicroscopic features, including the opacity of the corneal stroma, the area of corneal neovascularization and epithelial defect, the probability of hyphema, and the number of ulcer cases, were observed and recorded on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 after surgery. On days 7 and 14, HE staining was done to observe corneal tissue with infiltrated inflammatory cells. An immunoreaction to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was detected. Data from multiple groups or two groups at corresponding times were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Results On days 14, the corneal stroma in group C was clear compared to group B (U=2.00, P<0.05). The areas of neovascularization in groups B and C on days 7, 10, and 14 were obviously smaller than the area in group A (U=5.00, 2.00, P<0.05; U=0.00, 0.00, P<0.05; U=0.00, 0.00, P<0.05). The difference between groups B and C was not statistically significant. On days 10 and 14, the areas in groups A and C with epithelial defects were obviously smaller than the area in group B (U=0.00, 0.00, P<0.05; U=0.00, 0.00, P<0.05). The possibility of hyphema in group C was the smallest and no ulcer cases were detected. The hyphema in group B was as severe as group A and many ulcer cases were detected. HE and immunohistochemical staining on days 7 and 14 revealed that the highest number of inflammatory cells infiltrating the corneal stroma and VEGF positive cells was detected in group A, followed by groups B and C (inflammatory cells, U=2.00, 0.00, P<0.05; U=0.00, 0.00, P<0.05. VEGF positive cells, U=0.00, 0.00, P<0.05; U=0.00, 0.00, P<0.05). There were fewer inflammatory cells in group C than in group B on days 7 and 14 (U=0.00, 0.00, P<0.05) and the difference in VEGF positive cells on day 7 was not statistically significant. On day 14, there were fewer VEGF positive cells in group C than in group B (U=3.00, P<0.05). Conclusion Tacrolimus is effective for nonspecific keratitis induced by alkali burn and superior to dexamethasone for safety.
闫应朝,李锦阳,陈梦曦,徐思思,张一威,谷丽君. 他克莫司治疗碱烧伤致大鼠非特异性角膜炎的疗效及安全性[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2016, 18(1): 33-40.
Yan Yingzhao,Li Jinyang,Chen Mengxi,Xu Sisi,Zhang Yiwei,Gu Lijun. The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for treating nonspecific keratitis in rats caused by alkali burn . Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2016, 18(1): 33-40. DOI: DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2016.01.008
Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ. Alkali injuries of the eye[M]. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby,2005:1288.
[6]
Papathanassiou M, Theodossiadis PG, Liarakos VS, et al. Inhibition of corneal neovascularization by subconjunctival bevacizumab in an animal model[J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2008, 145(3):424-431. DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.11.003.
[7]
Giacomini C, Ferrari G, Bignami F, et al. Alkali burn versus suture-induced corneal neovascularization inC57BL/6 mice: an overview of two common animal models of corneal neovascularization[J]. Exp Eye Res,2014,121:1-4. DOI:10.1016/j.exer.2014.02.005.
[8]
D′Amato RJ, Loughnan MS, Flynn E, et al. Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1994, 91(9):4082-4085.
Wang JC, Su D, Lim L. Contact lens microbial keratitis and prior topical steroid use: a disaster in the making?[J]. Ann Acad Med Singapore,2004,33(4):484-488.
[11]
Stein RM, Clinch TE, Cohen EJ, et al. Infected vs sterile corneal infiltrates in contact lens wearers[J]. Am J Ophthalmol,1988,105(6):632-636.
[12]
Ben-Hanan I, Landshman N, Assia E, et al. Further evidence for the involvement of immunoregulatory processes in corneal alkali burns: effects of immunosuppression and convalescent serum[J]. Ophthalmic Res,1986,18(5):288-291.
Kao WW, Zhu G, Benza R, et al. Appearance of immune cells and expression of MHCⅡ DQ molecule by fibroblasts in alkali-burned corneas[J]. Cornea,1996,15(4):397-408. DOI:10.1097/00003226-199607000-00010.
[17]
Chang JH, Garg NK, Lunde E, et al. Corneal neovascularization: an anti-VEGF therapy review[J]. Surv Ophthalmol,2012,57(5):415-429. DOI:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.01.007.
[18]
Lu P, Li L, Wu Y, et a1. Essential contribution of CCL3 to alkalj-induced corneal neovaseuIarization by regulating vascular endothelial growth factor production by macrophages[J]. Mol Vis, 2008,14:16l4-l622.
[19]
Spencer CM, Goa KL, Gillis JC. Tacrolimus. An update of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of organ transplantation[J]. Drugs,1997,54(6):925-975.
[20]
Vichyanond P, Kosrirukvongs P. Use of cyclosporine A and tacrolimus in treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis[J]. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep,2013,13(3):308-314. DOI:10.1007/s11882-013-0345-0.
[21]
Al-Amri AM. Long-term follow-up of tacrolimus ointment for treatment of atopic keratoconjunctivitis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2014,157(2):280-286. DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.10.006.
Hikita N, LoPez JS, Chan CC, et al. Use of topical FK506 in a corneal graft rejection model in Lewis rats[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,1997,38(5):901-909.
[24]
Namkoong S, Chung J, Yoo J, et al. Topical tacrolimus does not negatively impact acute skin wound healing[J]. Exp Dermatol,2013,22(5):369-371. DOI:10.1111/exd.12131.
Hoffart L, Matonti F, Conrath J, et al. Inhibition of corneal neovascularization after alkali burn: comparison of different doses of bevacizumab in monotherapy or associated with dexamethasone[J]. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol,2010,38(4):346-352.
Su W, Li Z, Li Y, et al. Doxycycline enhances the inhibitory effects of bevacizumab on corneal neovascularization and prevents its side effects[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2011,52(12):9108-9115. DOI:10.1167/iovs.11-7255.
[29]
Luo JC, Shin VY, Liu ES, et al. Dexamethasone delays ulcer healing by inhibition of angiogenesis in rat stomachs[J]. Eur J Pharmacol,2004,485(1-3):275-281. DOI:10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.11. 038.