Objective:To evaluate the consistency between the Kay Picture Test Linear Crowded Book and the standard logarithmic visual acuity chart in preschool children's vision screening and to help the children who could not complete the standard logarithmic visual acuity chart.Methods:A prospective self-controlled study design was performed. One hundred fifty-two preschool children were enrolled from January 2021 to May 2021, who had completed a comprehensive ophthalmological examination and vision test with the KayPictureTestLinearCrowdedBook and the standard logarithmic visual acuity chart. The Wilcoxon sign rank test, Spearman rank correlation analysis and Bland-Altman were used for analysis. Results:One hundred ?fty-two preschool children participated in the screening and 129 children who were without refractive errors and who completed the 2 visual acuity tests were included. There were 74 males and 55 females among the 129 children with a mean age of 52.3±7.0 months. Acuities were 0.1(0.09, 0.1)LogMAR measured by the KayPictureTestLinearCrowdedBook and were 0.1(0.1, 0.22) LogMAR for the standard logarithmic visual acuity chart. There was a good correlation between the two charts (r=0.436,P<0.001). The visual acuity level measured by the Kay Picture Test Linear Crowded Book was higher by 0.04 LogMAR than with the other chart (Z=-6.124,P<0.001). Bland and Altman scatter plots showed that 98.4% of the points were within the 95% limits of agreement. The degree of cooperation for the KayPicture TestLinearCrowdedBook was higher than for the standard logarithmic visual acuity chart (χ2=18.007,P<0.001). The visual acuities measured by the Kay Picture Test Linear Crowded Book were signi?cantly different for different ages groups (H=13.791,P=0.003), with a trend that increased with age.Conclusions:The KayPictureTestLinearCrowdedBook can be used for vision screening in preschool children with a good measurement consistency and higher completion rate compared to the standard logarithmic visual acuity chart. The visual acuity level measured by the KayPictureTestLinearCrowdedBook is higher by 0.04 LogMAR than measurements by the other visual acuity chart, so visual acuity standards should be adjusted appropriately.
史沛艳,葛金玲,孙政,等. 拥挤Kay图片视力表在学龄前儿童视力筛查中的应用 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2021, 23(11): 852-857.
Peiyan Shi, Jinling Ge, Zheng Sun,et al. The Use of the Kay Picture Test Linear Crowded Book for Vision Screening in Preschool Children. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2021, 23(11): 852-857. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210709-00270
Kay H. New method of assessing visual acuity with pictures. Br J Ophthalmol, 1983, 67(2): 131-133. DOI: 10.1136/ bjo.67.2.131.
[2]
Saunders KJ. Testing visual acuity of young children: An evidence-based guide for optometrists. Optometry in Practice, 2010, 11(4): 161-168.
[3]
O'Connor AR, Milling A. Normative data for the redesigned Kay Pictures visual acuity test. J AAPOS, 2020, 24(4): 242-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.05.003.
[4]
Milling AF, Newsham D, Tidbury LP, et al. The redevelopment of the Kay picture test of visual acuity. Br Ir Orthopt J, 2016, 13: 14-21. DOI: 10.22599/bioj.97.
[5]
O'Boyle C, Chen SI, Little JA. Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: A quantitative comparison. Br J Ophthalmol, 2017, 101(4): 457- 461. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307677.
[6]
Elliott MC, Firth AY. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study. Eye (Lond), 2009, 23(1): 85-88. DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702990.
[7]
Lequeux L, Thouvenin D, Couret C, et al. Vision screening for children: recommended practices from AFSOP. J Fr Ophtalmol, 2021, 44(2): 244-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.07.005.
[8]
Jones D, Westall C, Averbeck K, et al. Visual acuity assessment: a comparison of two tests for measuring children's vision. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2003, 23(6): 541-546. DOI: 10.1046/ j.1475-1313.2003.00150.x.
[9]
Cotter SA, Cyert LA, Miller JM, et al. Vision screening for children 36 to <72 months: recommended practices. Optom Vis Sci, 2015, 92(1): 6-16. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000429.
[10]
Stiff H, Dimenstein N, Larson SA. Vision screening outcomes in children less than 3 years of age compared with children 3 years and older. J AAPOS, 2020, 24(5): 293.e1-293.e4. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jaapos.2020.05.016.
[11]
US Preventive Services Task Force, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Vision screening in children aged 6 months to 5 years: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA, 2017, 318(9): 836-844. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.11260.
[12]
Stoll N, Speeg-Schatz C, Sauer A. Vision screening in children: Review of the literature. J Fr Ophtalmol, 2019, 42(10): 1116- 1123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.08.001.
[13]
Solebo AL, Cumberland PM, Rahi JS. Whole-population vision screening in children aged 4-5 years to detect amblyopia.Lancet, 2015, 385(9984): 2308-2319. DOI: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(14)60522-5.
Anstice NS, Jacobs RJ, Simkin SK, et al. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children. PLoS One, 2017, 12(2): e0170839. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170839.
[18]
Sandfeld L, Weihrauch H, Tubaek G, et al. Ophthalmological data on 4.5- to 7-year-old Danish children. Acta Ophthalmol, 2018, 96(4): 379-383. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13650.
[19]
Lalor S, Formankiewicz MA, Waugh SJ. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols. Vision Res, 2016, 121: 31-38. DOI: 10.1016/ j.visres.2016.01.007.
[20]
Shah N, Laidlaw DA, Rashid S, et al. Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity test chart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects. Eye (Lond), 2012, 26(4): 593- 600. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.333.
[21]
Little JA, Molloy J, Saunders KJ. The differing impact of induced astigmatic blur on crowded and uncrowded pediatric visual acuity chart results. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2012, 32(6): 492-500. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00939.x.
Anstice NS, Thompson B. The measurement of visual acuity in children: an evidence-based update. Clin Exp Optom, 2014, 97(1): 3-11. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12086.
浙公网安备 33030202001892号