|
|
|
| Comparison of Refractive Measures of Three Autorefractors in School-Aged Children and Adolescents |
| Chunjie Lu, Di Song, Yize Chen, Changsen Tu, Xinjie Mao, Liangde Xu, Jia Qu |
| Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract To assess the validity, differences and agreements among measurements of refractive status in school-aged children and adolescents using Goaleye RM-9000, Nidek AR-1 and Topcon RM-800. Methods: In this prospective study, 449 individuals (449 right eyes) aged from 9 to 18 from Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University were measured in turns by the three autorefractors for their refractive status in random sequence from May to June, 2019. Then a professional optometrist conducted a subjective refraction for them by phoropter. All measurements by the three autorefractors were compared using a Friedman test, and measurements by the three autorefractors were compared with the subjective refraction respectively using Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Results: The median of spherical equivalent (SE) from Goaleye RM-9000, Nidek AR-1, Topcon RM-800 and the subjective refraction were -2.38(2.63)D,
-2.63(2.44)D, -2.75(2.56)D and -2.38(2.50)D, respectively. There were significant differences among the SE of the three autorefractors in the refraction measurement of school-aged children and adolescents (χ2 =384.893, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the SE of Goaleye RM-9000 and subjective refraction (Z=-0.199, P=0.842), There were significant differences between the SE of Nidek AR-1 and subjective refraction (Z=-11.753, P<0.001), There were significant differences between the SE of Topcon RM-800 and subjective refraction (Z=-15.733, P<0.001). Conclusion: The measurements conducted by Goaleye RM-9000 and Nidek AR-1 were more accurate than by Topcon RM-800. There were significant differences among the results of the three autorefractors in the refraction measurement of school-aged children and adolescents.
|
|
Received: 25 June 2019
|
| Fund: Zhejiang Province Science and Technology Benefiting Project (2014H01007) |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Jia Qu, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
(Email: Jia.qu@163.com)
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
Harvey EM, Miller JM, Schwiegerling J. Utility of an open field Shack-Hartmann aberrometer for measurement of refractive error in infants and young children. J AAPOS, 2013, 17(5): 494- 500. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.05.015.
|
| [2] |
He M, Xiang F, Zeng Y, et al. Effect of time spent outdoors at school on the development of myopia among children in China: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2015, 314(11): 1142-1148. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.10803.
|
| [3] |
Dirani M, Chan YH, Gazzard G, et al. Prevalence of refractive error in Singaporean Chinese children: the strabismus, amblyopia and refractive error in young Singaporean children
|
|
(STARS) study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010, 51(3): 1348- 1355. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3587.
|
| [4] |
Lai YH, Tseng HY, Hsu HT, et al. Uncorrected visual acuity and noncycloplegic autorefraction predict significant refractive errors in Taiwanese preschool children. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(2): 271-276. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.009.
|
| [5] |
Lattimore MR Jr, Kaupp S, Schallhorn S, et a1. Orbscan pachymetry: implications of a repeated measures and diurnal variation analysis. Ophthalmology, 1999, 106(5): 977-981. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00519-9.
|
| [6] |
Read SA, Collins MJ. Diurnal variation of corneal shape and thickness. OptomVis Sci, 2009, 86(3): 170-180. DOI: 10.1097/ OPX.0b013e3181981b7e.
|
| [7] |
Morgan IG, Iribarren R, Fotouhi A, et al. Cycloplegic refraction is the gold standard for epidemiological studies. Acta Ophthalmol, 2015, 93(6): 581-585. DOI: 10.1111/aos.12642.
|
| [8] |
蒋玲玲, 徐菁菁, 李苗苗, 等. 初发近视儿童非睫状肌麻痹主觉验光的准确性评估. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019, 21(3): 200-204. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.03.
|
|
008.
|
| [9] |
Zhao JL, Mao J, Luo R, et al. Accuracy of noncycloplegic autorefraction in school-age children in China. Optom Vis Sci, 2004, 81(1): 49-55.
|
| [10] |
Guha S, Shah S, Shah K, et al. A comparison of cycloplegic autorefraction and retinoscopy in Indian children. Clin Exp Optom, 2017, 100(1): 73-78. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12375.
|
| [11] |
ChoongYF, Chen AH, Goh PP. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children. Am J Ophthalmol, 2006, 142(1): 68-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.01.084.
|
| [12] |
Pesudovs K, Weisinger HS. A comparison of autorefractor performance. Optom Vis Sci, 2004, 81(7): 554-558.
|
| [13] |
Xiong SY, Lv MZ, Zou HD, et al. Comparison of refractive measures of three autorefractors in children and adolescents. Optom Vis Sci, 2017, 94(9): 894-902. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.
|
| 00 |
00000000001113.
|
|
|
|
