|
|
Clinical Outcomes of Smart Pulse Technology Assisted TransPRK to Treat Moderate to High Astigmatism |
Bo Zhao, Jingxian Wei, Mingshan Fu |
Shanxi Yuncheng Eye Hospital, Yuncheng 044000, China |
|
|
Abstract To evaluate the clinical efficacy of corneal wavefront aberration-guided TransPRK surgery in the correction of moderate to high astigmatism with the help of smart pulse technology (SPT). Methods: In this retrospective study, TransPRK- corrected myopia in 29 patients (54 eyes) with high astigmatism in Yuncheng City Eye Hospital during July 2016 to December 2017 were examined. The eyes were examined before treatment and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment for uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and manifest refraction, slit lamp microscopy, intraocular pressure measurements, and Pentacam corneal topography measurements. The preoperative spherical scope ranged from -6.00 to -1.25 D (mean -3.57±1.19 D), and the cylinder range was 1.50 to 4.00 D (mean 2.06± 0.55 D). The clinical outcomes and evaluation of the postoperative astigmatism vector in the correction of myopia with moderate and high astigmatism were evaluated. Preop and postop indexes were analyzed by repeated measurement analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between different variables. Results: Six months after surgery, 98% of the eyes had a UCVA of 1.0 or better, and an 87% equivalent spherical value of between ±0.50. The intended refractive correction (IRC) was 2.03±0.51 D, the mean of the surgically induced refractive correction (SIRC) was 2.02±0.69 D, the mean of the error vector (EV) was 0.49±0.35 D, the mean of the error angle (EA) was -1.37±7.62°, the mean of error magnitude (EM) was 0.23±0.40 D, the mean of error ratio (ER) was 0.25±0.19, and the mean of correction ratio (CR) was 0.99±0.21. There were significant correlations between IRC and SIRC (r=0.95, P<0.001), between EM and IRC (r=0.55, P<0.001) and between EV and ER (r=0.92, P<0.001). The EA results suggested that astigmatism changes counterclockwise, with the percentage of eyes in the range of 5° and 15° being 65% (35 eyes) and 96% (52 eyes). The CR results suggested a slight under correction of postoperative astigmatism. Conclusions: Corneal wavefront-guided TransPRK and the smart pulse technology assisted TransPRK show safe, predictable results in the correction of myopia with moderate and high astigmatism. It is necessary to improve the accuracy of astigmatism power and its axial direction before and during the surgery
|
Received: 07 April 2019
|
Fund: Key Research and Development Projects of Shanxi Province (201803D31018) |
Corresponding Authors:
Jingxian Wei, Shanxi Yuncheng Eye Hospital, Yuncheng 044000, China (Email:
weijxian@163.com)
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Read SA, Collins MJ, Carney LG. A review of astigmatism and its possible genesis. Clin Exp Optom, 2007, 90(1): 5-19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00112.x.
|
[2] |
Alipour F, Veisi Hampa F, Ashrafi E, et al. Factors influencing cyclotorsion during photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg, 2018, 34(2): 106-112. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20171128-02.
|
[3] |
Aslanides IM, Kymionis GD. Trans advanced surface laser ablation (TransPRK) outcomes using smart pulse technology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2017, 40(1): 42-46. DOI: 10.1016/j. clae.2016.11.004.
|
[4] |
张军燕, 李莹. 智能脉冲技术辅助的激光角膜屈光手术早期效果. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2016, 18(12): 709-713. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2016.12.002.
|
[5] |
中华医学会眼科学分会角膜病学组. 激光角膜屈光手术临床诊疗专家共识(2015年). 中华眼科杂志, 2015, 51(4): 249-254. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2015.04.003.
|
[6] |
中华医学会眼科学分会眼视光学组. 我国角膜地形图引导个性化激光角膜屈光手术专家共识(2018年). 中华眼科杂志, 2018, 54(1): 23-26. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2018.01.
|
|
005.
|
[7] |
Eydelman MB, Drum B, Holladay J, et al. Standardized analyses of correction of astigmatism by laser systems that reshape the cornea. J Refract Surg, 2006, 22(1): 81-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs. 2005.12.051.
|
[8] |
郭维涛, 王雁. 矢量分析法在评价角膜屈光手术矫正散光 效果中的应用. 中华眼科杂志, 2016, 52(1): 63-67. DOI: 10. 3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2016.01.017.
|
[9] |
Montalt JC, Porcar E, España-Gregori E, et al. Corneoscleral contact lenses fitting on irregular corneas after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Arq Bras Oftalmol, 2018, 81(4): 310-315. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20180061.
|
[10] |
Luger MH, Ewering T, Arba-Mosquera S. Myopia correction with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: One-year casematched analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2016, 42(11): 1579- 1587. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.025.
|
[11] |
Aslanides IM, Georgoudis PN, Selimis VD, et al. Singlestep transepithelial ASLA (SCHWIND) with mitomycin-C for the correction of high myopia: long term follow-up. Clin
|
|
Ophthalmol, 2015, 9: 33-41. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S73424.
|
[12] |
Jun I, Kang D, Reinstein DZ, et al. Clinical outcomes of SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK in high astigmatism. J Refract Surg, 2018, 34(3): 156-163. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20180104-03.
|
[13] |
Kugler L, Cohen I, Haddad W, et al. Efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting anterior and non-anterior corneal astigmatism: comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(10): 1745-1752. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.014.
|
[14] |
孙丽霞, 辜美山, 张日平, 等. 经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术治疗近视散光术后散光的矢量分析. 中华眼视光学与视觉科 学杂志, 2018, 20(5): 306-312. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-
|
84 |
5X.2018.05.010.
|
[15] |
Ghoreishi M, Naderi Beni A, Naderi Beni Z, et al. Comparing aspheric ablation profile with standard corneal ablation for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism, a contralateral eye study. Lasers Med Sci, 2017, 32(9): 2129-2138. DOI: 10. 1007/s10103-017-2357-9.
|
|
|
|