OA-2000和Sirius测量近视眼眼前节参数的比较

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210408-00144

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (28)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

Guide

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the agreement in measuring the anterior ocular segment in myopia using the OA-2000 and Sirius systems. Methods: In this case series study, OA-2000 and Sirius were used to measure the corneal white-to-white (WTW) distance, anterior chamber depth (ACD) and central corneal thickness (CCT) of the anterior segment of 112 subjects (224 eyes) with myopia. The subjects visited the Department of Ophthalmology, Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University from October 1 to October 31, 2020. A paired t test and Pearson correlation analysis were used to compare the difference and correlation between the two instruments, and the Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate their consistency. Results: The average horizontal corneal diameter (WTW) was 11.84±0.38 mm and 11.87±0.38 mm respectively by Sirius, OA-2000, which was a statistically significant difference (t=-3.66, P<0.001). The average anterior chamber depth (ACD) from the corneal endothelium to the anterior surface of the lens was 3.23±0.26 mm and 3.16±0.25 mm, which was a statistically significant difference (t=15.11, P<0.001). The average central corneal thickness (CCT) was 538±35 µm and 524±34 µm, which was a statistically significant difference (t=27.20, P<0.001). There were high correlations between the two instruments: WTW (r=0.97, P<0.001), ACD (r=0.96, P<0.001), and CCT (r=0.97, P<0.001). The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) between the devices for WTW, ACD, and CCT were -0.16-0.21 mm, -0.20-0.07 mm, and -29.1-1.1 µm using the Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) method. Conclusions: The correlations between OA-2000 and Sirius in terms of measuring anterior segment parameters in myopia are excellent. Significant differences were detected in WTW, ACD and CCT, so they should not be directly substituted for each other

Key words： OA-2000 Sirius anterior chamber depth corneal diameter central corneal thickness ocular biological measurement

Received: 08 April 2021

PACS:

Fund:

Corresponding Authors: Wei Chen, Department of Ophthalmology, Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University, Shenzhen 518036, China (Email: jennifercw6@163.com)

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wei Chen
	Meiping Xu
	Yudong Lin
	et al

Cite this article:

Wei Chen,Meiping Xu,Yudong Lin等. Comparison between OA-2000 and Sirius for Measuring the Anterior Segment Parameters of Myopia[J]. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2022, 24(1): 34-39.

URL:

https://www.cjoovs.com/EN/10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210408-00144 OR https://www.cjoovs.com/EN/Y2022/V24/I1/34

[1]	梁婉玲, 马海智, 周怀胜, 等. IOLMaster 700测量白内障患者眼部相关生物参数的分析. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2021, 23(6): 446-450. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210105-00007.
[2]	Liao X, Peng Y, Liu B, et al. Agreement of ocular biometricmeasurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 3134. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59919-y.
[3]	李逸丰, 杨文利, 李栋军, 等. 基于扫频源相干光断层成像原理与部分相干光干涉原理的生物测量仪在眼轴测量中的比较. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2018, 20(11): 648-652.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2018.11.002.
[4]	邱乐梅, 张小兰, 王顺清, 等. Sirius和Orbscan-Ⅱ对近视眼角膜横径及前房深度测量比较. 中国实用眼科杂志, 2014, 32(11):1285-1287. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2014.011.006.
[5]	Domínguez-Vicent A, Pérez-Vives C, Ferrer-Blasco T, et al.Device interchangeability on anterior chamber depth and white-to-white measurements: a thorough literature review.Int J Ophthalmol, 2016, 9(7): 1057-1065. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.07.20.
[6]	杨亚波, 姚克, 万婷, 等. 图解中央孔型ICL/TICL手术操作与技巧. 浙江大学出版社, 2018: 16.
[7]	Ferrer-Blasco T, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Martínez-Albert N, et al.Agreement of white-to-white measurements with the IOLMaster700, Atlas 9000, and Sirius systems. Expert Rev Med Devices,2018, 15(6): 453-459. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1481745.
[8]	Huang J, Liao N, Savini G, et al. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with Scheimpflug/Placido photography-based topography system and IOLMaster partial coherence interferometry in patients with cataracts. J Ophthalmol, 2014,2014: 540760. DOI: 10.1155/2014/540760.
[9]	蔡锡安, 汪红, 安晓巨. Sirius、IOLMaster及两脚规测量角膜横径的比较. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志, 2020, 42(5): 387-391.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116022-20191126-00396.
[10]	Hua Y, Qiu W, Xiao Q, et al. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.PLoS One, 2018, 13(2): e0193023. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.
[11]	华焱军, 肖秋怡, 吴强. 新型眼生物测量仪Tomey OA-2000和IOLMaster获得的白内障患者眼生物参数的比较. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(9): 845-848. DOI: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0214.
[12]	崇晓霞, 王岩, 王盼, 等. OA-2000与IOLMaster 500、A型超声测量白内障眼部生物学参数的比较. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019, 21(5): 370-374. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.05.009.
[13]	Goebels S, Pattmöller M, Eppig T, et al. Comparison of3 biometry devices in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg,2015, 41(11): 2387-2393. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.028.
[14]	Lu W, Li Y, Savini G, et al. Comparison of anterior segment measurements obtained using a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and a Scheimpflug-Placido tomographer.J Cataract Refract Surg, 2019, 45(3): 298-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.033.
[15]	Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 2007, 85(5): 472-485. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-
04	20.2007.00879.x.
[16]	中华医学会眼科学分会眼视光学组. 中国有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术专家共识(2019年). 中华眼科杂志, 2019,55(9): 652-657. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2019.09.005.
[17]	McAlinden C. Corneal refractive surgery: Past to present.Clin Exp Optom, 2012, 95(4): 386-398. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00761.x.
[18]	Belovay GW, Goldberg I. The thick and thin of the central corneal thickness in glaucoma. Eye (Lond), 2018, 32(5): 915-923. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0033-3.
[19]	Guber I, McAlinden C, Majo F, et al. Identifying more reliable parameters for the detection of change during the follow-up of
	mild to moderate keratoconus patients. Eye Vis (Lond), 2017, 4:24. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-017-0089-3.
[20]	Wen D, Song B, Li Q, et al. Comparison of epithelium-off versus transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cornea,2018, 37(8): 1018-1024. DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000001632.
[21]	Yildirim Y, Olcucu O, Agca A, et al. Topographic and biomechanical evaluation of corneas in patients with ocular rosacea. Cornea, 2015, 34(3): 313-317. DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000000350.
[22]	毕文娇, 吴洁, 刘坤, 等. Tomey OA-2000、IOLMaster700及A超角膜测厚仪测量近视患者中央角膜厚度的比较. 眼科新进展, 2019, 39(8): 776-779.
[23]	Gao R, Chen H, Savini G, et al. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence
	tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry.Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 2484. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02463-z.[24]
	毕文娇, 吴洁, 郭振, 等. 五种方法测量近视患者中央角膜厚度的研究. 国际眼科杂志, 2020, 20(7): 1286-1289. DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.7.38.
[25]	Kumar M, Shetty R, Jayadev C, et al. Repeatability and agreement of five imaging systems for measuring anterior segment parameters in healthy eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2017,65(4): 288-294. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_729_16.
[26]	Jin Y, McAlinden C, Sun Y, et al. Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido versus ultrasound pachymetry for central corneal thickness:
	meta-analysis. Eye Vis (Lond), 2021, 8(1): 5. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-021-00227-5.
[27]	Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, et al. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on
	applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol, 2006, 124(4): 471-476. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.124.4.471.
[28]	中华医学会眼科学分会角膜病学组. 激光角膜屈光手术临床诊疗专家共识(2015年). 中华眼科杂志, 2015, 51(4): 249-254.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2015.04.003.