Objective To evaluate the changes in visual acuity and reaction times at different contrast levels in myopic patients before and after sub-Bowman′s keratomileusis (SBK). Methods This was a prospective self-control study. A total of 20 patients (40 eyes) who had undergone SBK were enrolled in this study. LogMAR contrast visual acuity and reaction times were measured by the multi-functional visual acuity tester (MFVA-100) at 4 contrast levels (100%, 25%, 10%, 5%) with a dark background in a dark environment before surgery and 1 month and 3 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and SNK. Results At the same room illumination, logMAR values gradually increased as contrast levels decreased. The postoperative logMAR values at 100% and 25% contrasts were significantly lower than preoperative values (q=4.722, 5.167, P<0.05; q=3.000, 3.217, P<0.05), but the differences were not significant at 10% and 5% contrast levels (F=1.647, 1.382, P>0.05). Reaction time increased with decreases in contrast levels. The postoperative reaction times became shorter at contrast levels of 100%, but were longer at 25%, 10% and 5% contrast levels. The differences were not significant (F=0.484, 0.049, 1.073, 0.637, P>0.05). Conclusion After SBK, the logMAR values at 100% and 25% contrast levels were reduced, but there were no significant differences at 10% and 5% contrast levels. The surgery has no effect on reaction times at the 4 contrast levels. Myopic patients can acquire good contrast visual acuity in a dark environment after SBK. Contrast visual acuity and reaction time may be used as one of the bases to evaluate the effects of the surgery.
薛林平,沈政伟,姜黎,尹禾,莫婷. 机械法准分子激光前弹力层下角膜磨镶术治疗近视前后暗环境下的对比度视力与反应时间比较[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2013, 15(8): 496-499.
XUE Lin-ping,SHEN Zheng-wei,JIANG Li,YIN He,MO Ting. A study of visual acuity and reaction times of myopic patients at different contrast levels before and after sub-Bowman′s keratomileusis. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2013, 15(8): 496-499. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2013.08.012
Solomon KD, Fernández de Castro LE, Sandoval HP, et al. LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction. Ophthalmology,2009,116:691-701.
[2]
Hersh PS, Steinert RF, Brint SF. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of optical side effects. Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. Ophthalmology,2000,107:925-933.
[3]
Fan-Paul NI, Li J, Miller JS, et al. Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol,2002,47:533-546.
Lackner B, Pieh S, Funovics MA, et al. Influence of spectacle-related changes in retinal image size on contrast sensitivity function after 1aser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg,2004,30:626-632.
[9]
Cobo-Soriano R, Calvo MA, Beltrán J, et al. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: analysis of contrast sensitivity, visual, and refractive outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg,2005,31:1357-1365.
[10]
Auran JD, Koester CJ, Kleiman NJ, et al. Scanning slit confocal microscopic observation of cell morphology and movement within the normal human anterior cornea. Ophthalmology,1995,102:33-41.