多焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量和阅读能力的研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20191010-00274

摘要
图/表
参考文献(25)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF 890KB HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：研究多焦点人工晶状体（IOL）植入术后白内障患者的视觉质量及阅读能力。方法：前瞻性临床研究。选择2018年6月至2019年10月于重庆医科大学附属第一医院眼科就诊并行双眼白内障手术的患者共75例（150眼），依据患者选择的IOL进行分组，双眼植入Tecnis ZCB00 IOL 25例（50眼）作为单焦组，双眼植入Tecnis ZMB00 IOL 25例（50眼）作为双焦组，双眼植入AT Lisa tri.839MP IOL 25例（50眼）作为三焦组，对比3组患者术后3个月时的祼眼远视力（UDVA）、祼眼中视力（UIVA）、祼眼近视力（UNVA）（LogMAR）及阅读能力。使用NEI-RQL-42量表中文版评价3组患者术后视觉质量的差异。数据采用卡方检验、方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验、Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。结果：共75例（150眼）患者纳入研究。3组间UDVA差异无统计学意义（H=3.187，P=0.203）。三焦组UIVA（0.2±0.1）优于双焦组（0.3±0.2）（Z=-2.041，P=0.041）和单焦组（0.3±0.3）（Z=-2.142， P=0.032）。三焦组UNVA（0.3±0.2）和双焦组UNVA（0.3±0.2）优于单焦组（0.4±0.2）（t=2.332， P=0.017；t=3.014，P=0.036）。3组阅读视力（F=0.421，P=0.658）、阅读速度（F=1.754，P=0.182）、阅读错误率（H=6.347，P=0.052）差异均无统计学意义。三焦组近视力维度得分（92±14）和双焦组近视力维度得分（100±11）均高于单焦组（50±42）（U=-3.139，P=0.005；U=-3.726，P=0.001）；三焦组中视力维度得分（100±12）高于双焦组（75±25）和单焦组（25±75）（U=-2.758，P=0.017； U=-3.145，P=0.002）。三焦组脱镜率维度得分（100±25）和双焦组脱镜率维度得分（100±40）高于单焦组（30±100）（U=-3.004，P=0.008；U=-3.766，P=0.001）。结论：多焦点IOL植入患者可获得与单焦点IOL植入患者配戴老花镜时相同的近距离视觉质量；AT Lisa tri.839MP IOL与Tecnis ZMB00 IOL 可提供相同的远近视力及近距离阅读能力，但前者中距离视觉质量更佳。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：多焦点人工晶状体, 单焦点人工晶状体, 视觉质量, 阅读能力

Abstract：Objective: To evaluate the visual quality and reading performance of cataract patients after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Methods: This was a prospective clinical study. Seventy-five cataract patients (150 eyes) who had cataract surgery in the Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from June 2018 to October 2019 were involved. Twenty-five patients (fifty eyes) were implanted bilaterally with a Tecnis ZCB00 IOL as the monofocal group, 25 patients (fifty eyes) were implanted bilaterally with a Tecnis ZMB00 IOL as the bifocal group and 25 patients (fifty eyes) were implanted bilaterally with an AT Lisa tri.839MP IOL as the trifocal group. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), reading performance at 40 cm and the Chinese NEI-RQL-42 scale were assessed 3 months postoperatively. Data were assessed with a Chi-square test, analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: UDVA showed no significant difference among the three groups (H=3.187, P=0.203); the UIVA of the trifocal group (0.2±0.1) was significantly better than the monofocal group (0.3±0.3)(Z=-2.142, P=0.032) and the bifocal group (0.3±0.2)(Z=-2.041, P=0.041). UNVA was significantly better in the bifocal group (0.3±0.2) and trifocal group (0.3±0.2) than in the monofocal group (0.4±0.2)(t=3.014, P=0.036 and t=2.332, P=0.017, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found in reading acuity at 40 cm (F=0.421, P=0.658), reading speed (F=1.754, P=0.182) or reading mistake rates (H=6.347, P=0.052) among the three groups. Near vision: The bifocal group (100±11) and trifocal group (92±14) were better than the monofocal group (50±42)(U=-3.726, P=0.001 and U=-3.139, P=0.005, respectively); Medium vision: The trifocal group (100±12) was better than the monofocal group (25±75)(U=-3.145, P=0.002); and the trifocal group was better than the bifocal group (75±25)(U=-2.758, P=0.017); Spectacle independence rate: The bifocal group (100±40) and trifocal group (100±25) were better than the monofocal group (30±100)(U=-3.766, P=0.001 and U=-3.004, P=0.008, respectively). Conclusions: Reading performance can evaluate the near visual quality of cataract patients. The AT Lisa tri 839MP IOL can provide distance and near visual acuity and reading performance similar to the Tecnis ZMB00 IOL with better medium visual quality

Key words： multifocal intraocular lens monofocal intraocular lens visual quality reading performance

收稿日期: 2019-10-10

通讯作者: 李灿（ORCID：0000-0003-0481-5218），Email：892496605@qq.com

引用本文:

魏佩佩万文娟李灿. 多焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量和阅读能力的研究[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2020, 22(4): 256-261. Peipei Wei, Wenjuan Wan, Can Li. Visual Quality and Reading Performance after Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation in Cataract Patients. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2020, 22(4): 256-261. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20191010-00274

链接本文:

https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20191010-00274 或 https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/Y2020/V22/I4/256

[1]	周星延, 王静, 赵江月, 等. 三焦点人工晶状体术后早期临床观察. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2018, 20(6): 360-364. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2018.06.008.
[2]	Chen W, Meng Q, Ye H, et al. Reading ability and stereoacuity with combined implantation of refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Acta Ophthalmol, 2011, 89(4): 376-381. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01702.x.
[3]	Bartol-Puyal FA, Talavero P, Giménez G, et al. Reading and quality of life differences between Tecnis ZCB00 monofocal and Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2017, 27(4): 443-453. DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000925.
[4]	王静. 飞秒激光辅助制瓣的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术术后视觉质量评估及高阶像差变化研究. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2018.
[5]	Cillino G, Casuccio A, Pasti M, et al. Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology, 2014, 121(1): 34-44. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ophtha.2013.06.034.
[6]	Shah S, Peris-Martinez C, Reinhard T, et al. Visual outcomes after cataract surgery: Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg, 2015, 31(10): 658-666. DOI: 10.3928/ 1081597X-20150611-01.
[7]	Lin HT, Chen WR, Ding ZF, et al. Clinical evaluation of two multifocal intraocular lens implantation patterns. Int J Ophthalmol, 2012, 5(1): 76-83. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959. 2012.01.16.
[8]	吕帆, 瞿佳, 周翔天. 汉字视标视力表研究的焦点问题及其剖析. 中华眼科杂志, 2008, 44(7): 581-583. DOI: 10.3321/ j.issn:0412-4081.2008.07.002.
[9]	Kim M, Kim JH, Lim TH, et al. Comparison of reading speed after bilateral bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens implantation. Korean J Ophthalmol, 2018, 32(2): 77-82. DOI: 10.3341/ kjo.2017.0057.
[10]	Attia MS, Auffarth GU, Khoramnia R, et al. Near and intermediate reading performance of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens using a reading desk. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2015, 41(12): 2707-2714. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.038.
[11]	Hütz WW, Eckhardt HB, R?hrig B, et al. Reading ability with 3 multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32(12): 2015-2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.029.
[12]	Akku? ?G, Petri?li IS. Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses. Int Ophthalmol, 2018, 38(3): 1011-1019. DOI: 10.1007/s10792- 017-0552-0.
[13]	Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pi?ero DP, et al. Optical analysis, reading performance, and quality-of-life evaluation after implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011, 37(1): 27-37. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jcrs.2010.07.035.
[14]	Kaymak H, Breyer D, Alió JL, et al. Visual performance with bifocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses: A prospective three-armed randomized multicenter clinical trial. J Refract Surg, 2017, 33(10): 655-662. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X- 20170504-04.
[15]	Vryghem JC, Heireman S. Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol, 2013, 7: 1957-1965. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S44415.
[16]	García-Pérez JL, Gros-Otero J, Sánchez-Ramos C, et al. Short term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens. BMC Ophthalmol, 2017, 17(1): 72. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0462-y.
[17]	肖雪冰, 乌兰, 栾多, 等. 三焦点人工晶状体植入术后的早期临床效果. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2017, 19(5): 311- 314. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2017.05.011.
[18]	陈碧超, 谭倩, 王潇, 等. 双眼三焦点人工晶状体和双焦点人工晶状体植入术后早期视觉质量比较. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019, 21(6): 451-459. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674- 845X.2019.06.009.
[19]	刘杰为 , 何明光 . 视功能生存质量评价量表 . 中国临床康复 , 2002, 6(19): 2835-2837. DOI: 10.3321/ j.issn:1673-8225.2002.19.006.
[20]	Chang J. Bilateral implantation of a single-piece bifocal diffractive intraocular lens in presbyopic patients: A prospective case series. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila), 2019, 8(1): 12-21. DOI: 10.22608/APO.2018152.
[21]	Yamauchi T, Tabuchi H, Takase K, et al. Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses. PLoS One, 2013, 8(6): e68236. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068236.
[22]	李亚娣, 胡敏, 胡竹林. 多焦点人工晶体的临床应用进展. 医学综述, 2013, 19(23): 4311-4314. DOI: 10.3969/ j.issn.1006-2084.2013.23.030.
[23]	黄宝宇. 折射衍射结合型多焦点人工晶体-Acrysof ResToR植入术后的视功能研究. 南宁: 广西医科大学, 2010. DOI: 10.7666/d.y1683261.
[24]	王潇, 陈碧超, 曹丹敏, 等. 旋转非对称折射型多焦点人工晶状体植入术后早期效果. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2019, 21(4): 259-264. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674- 845X.2019.04.004.
[25]	Shen Z, Lin Y, Zhu Y, et al. Clinical comparison of patient outcomes following implantation of trifocal or bifocal intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 45337. DOI: 10.1038/srep45337.