微创切口巩膜扣带术后干眼的评估

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20191206-00327

摘要
图/表
参考文献(19)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF 2896KB HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：评估微创切口巩膜扣带术后的干眼情况。方法：前瞻性临床研究。选取2015年5月至2017年4月在西安交通大学第一附属医院眼科就诊的孔源性视网膜脱离拟行巩膜扣带术的患者78例（78眼），按随机数字表法分为2组：微创组接受微创切口巩膜扣带术，对照组接受标准巩膜扣带术。术前1周（基线）和术后1 d、1周和1个月分别采用眼表疾病指数（OSDI）和受试者干眼问卷进行干眼相关指标评估，运用眼表综合分析仪进行泪膜评估，采用Schirmer Ⅰ试验和荧光素染色。计数资料采用χ2 检验进行组间比较，2组间比较采用独立样本t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验。结果：2组患者基线资料差异无统计学意义。大部分患者在巩膜扣带术后发生或加重了干眼。主观症状和感受评分、荧光素染色评分均升高，泪膜破裂时间、泪液分泌试验均下降，术后1 d是拐点，术后1个月未回归至术前基线水平。2组泪河高度、泪膜破裂时间、泪液分泌试验和荧光素染色情况在术后1 d和1周差异无统计意义；但是术后1个月时，微创组的泪河高度（Z=1.04，P=0.041）、泪膜破裂时间（t=2.51，P<0.001）和泪液分泌试验（Z=2.34，P=0.043）优于对照组。微创组的OSDI和干眼问卷评分在术后1周和1个月时高于对照组（OSDI：t术后1周=2.54，P=0.012；Z术后1个月=-1.03，P=0.020；干眼问卷：t术后1周=3.04，P=0.011； t术后1个月=3.94，P<0.001）。术前合并干眼的患者在巩膜扣带术后1 d、1周和1个月荧光素染色评分均明显升高（Z=-2.42，P<0.001；Z=-1.54，P=0.034；Z=-1.83，P=0.041）。结论：巩膜扣带术会诱发或加重干眼。相比标准术式，微创切口巩膜扣带术会改善和缩短术后早期的干眼症状，尤其是术前合并干眼的患者，行微创切口巩膜扣带术干眼风险更小。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：巩膜扣带术, 微创, 干眼

Abstract：Objective: To compare dry eye signs and symptoms after minimal in situ conjunctival incision for segmental scleral buckling surgery. Methods: In this prospective clinical study, consecutive patients, enrolled in the Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, from May 2015 to April 2017, who had minimal in situ conjunctival incision or standard segmental scleral buckling surgery were assessed. Dry eye markers including the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and subjective symptom questionnaire, tear-film assessment using Keratograph 5M corneal topography, Schirmer Ⅰ testing, and fluorescein staining were sequentially evaluated preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively. A Chi-square test, Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences between the two groups. Results: Seventy-eight patients (78 eyes) with similar baseline characteristics were recruited. Most patients developed dry eye postoperatively. Subjective symptoms and fluorescein staining scores elevated from baseline, tear break-up time and Schirmer Ⅰ testing values decreased postoperatively, which peaked at 1 day and did not return to baseline within 1 month. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups (all P>0.05) at 1 day and 1 week except for the higher tear meniscus height (Z=1.04, P=0.041), noninvasive first tear break-up time and average break-up time (t=2.51, P<0.001), and Schirmer Ⅰ test values (Z=2.34, P=0.043), in the minimal in situ conjunctival incision group at 1 month postoperatively. OSDI scores and subjective symptoms were lower in the minimal in situ conjunctival incision group at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively (OSDI: t1 week=2.54, P=0.012; Z1 month=-1.03, P=0.020; subjective symptoms: t1 week=3.04, P=0.011; t1 month=3.94, P<0.001). Sub group analysis using flouesecein staining showed obvious worsening 1 day, 1 week and 1 month postoperatively in patients with preoperative dry eye (Z=-2.42, P<0.001; Z=-1.54, P=0.034; Z=-1.83, P=0.041). Conclusions: Segmental scleral buckling surgery can induce or aggravate dry eyes. Compared with standard procedures, minimal in situ conjunctival incision segmental scleral buckling surgery can improve and shorten the ocular surface discomfort in the early postoperative period, especially in patients with dry eyes before surgery.

Key words： segmental scleral buckling surgery small incision dry eyes

收稿日期: 2019-12-06

基金资助:西安交通大学第一附属医院新医疗新技术项目（XJYFY-2016W26，XJYFY-2017W61）

通讯作者: 刘钊（ORCID：0000-0002-8818-0549），Email：dr.liuzhao@foxmail.com

引用本文:

高宁程育宏谢安明张明刘钊. 微创切口巩膜扣带术后干眼的评估[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2020, 22(8): 582-588. Ning Gao, Yuhong Cheng, Anming Xie, Ming Zhang, Zhao Liu. Evaluation of Dry Eye after Minimal in Situ Conjunctival Incision for Segmental Scleral Buckling Surgery. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2020, 22(8): 582-588. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20191206-00327

链接本文:

https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/ 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20191206-00327 或 https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/Y2020/V22/I8/582

[1]	朱磊, 李琳, 田晓燕, 等. 巩膜扣带术后影响视网膜复位和视力恢复的相关因素分析. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(2): 167-171. DOI: 10.13389/ j.cnki.rao.2017.0044.
[2]	张秀丽, 杨星, 高宁. 孔源性视网膜脱离术后疼痛评估及原因分析. 临床眼科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 429-431. DOI: 10.3969/ j.issn.1006-8422.2019.05.012.
[3]	Belmonte C, Nichols JJ, Cox SM, et al. TFOS DEWS II pain and sensation report. Ocul Surf, 2017, 15(3): 404-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.002.
[4]	Jin H, Zhang Q, Zhao P. Minimal in situ conjunctival incision for segmental scleral buckling surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina, 2014, 45(6): 574-576. DOI: 10.3928/ 23258160-20141118-14.
[5]	李云环, 闫忠阳, 李善雨. 远离角膜缘的球结膜切口在巩膜外加压术中的临床应用效果评估. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2014, 6(11): 34-36. DOI: 10.3969/ j.issn.1674-7372.2014. 11.014.
[6]	Saldanha IJ, Petris R, Han G, et al. Research questions and outcomes prioritized by patients with dry eye. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2018, 136(10): 1170-1179. DOI: 10.1001/ jamaophthalmol.2018.3352.
[7]	刘钊, 吴昌睿, 高宁. 白内障超声乳化摘除手术对睑板腺功能的影响. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2015, 29(6): 68-70. DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2015.201.
[8]	万珊珊, 杨燕宁, 袁静, 等. 眼表综合分析仪评价干眼患者相关指标的临床分析. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2015, 17(3): 171-175. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2015.03. 010.
[9]	苏安乐, 刘钊. 屈光矫正方式对空中乘务员眼表的影响. 国际眼科杂志, 2017, 17(10): 1982-1984. DOI: 10.3980/ j.issn.1672- 5123.2017.10.49.
[10]	中华医学会眼科学分会角膜病学组. 干眼临床诊疗专家共识(2013年). 中华眼科杂志, 2013, 49(1): 73-75. DOI: 10.3760/ cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2013.01.020.
[11]	李云环, 闫忠阳, 李善雨. 微创巩膜外加压术治疗单纯性视网膜脱离的疗效. 国际眼科杂志, 2015, 15(2): 286-288. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2015.2.26.
[12]	Shimazaki J. Definition and diagnostic criteria of dry eye disease: Historical overview and future directions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2018, 59(14): DES7-DES12. DOI: 10.1167/ iovs.17-23475.
[13]	Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul Surf, 2017, 15(3): 334-365. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003.
[14]	Tian L, Qu JH, Zhang XY, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of noninvasive keratograph 5M Measurements in patients with dry eye disease. J Ophthalmol, 2016, 2016: 8013621. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8013621.
[15]	樊冬生. 微创巩膜外加压术治疗单纯孔源性视网膜脱离患者对视网膜复位及预后影响. 中国实用眼科杂志, 2016, 34(12): 1286-1289. DOI: 10.3760/ cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2016.12.012.
[16]	Vehof J, Sillevis Smitt-Kamminga N, Nibourg SA, et al. Predictors of discordance between symptoms and signs in dry eye disease. Ophthalmology, 2017, 124(3): 280-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.11.008.
[17]	李云鹏, 李丹丹, 曾蕊, 等. 手术显微镜下微创巩膜扣带术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志, 2018, 40(7): 512-514. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1477.2018. 07.009.
[18]	蒋艳华, 谢怀林. 单纯孔源性视网膜脱离行微创巩膜外加压术后影响复位和视力的因素分析. 国际眼科杂志, 2019, 19(3): 481-484. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.3.32.
[19]	García-Montero M, Rico-Del-Viejo L, Lorente-Velázquez A, et al. Repeatability of noninvasive keratograph 5M measurements associated with contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens, 2019, 45(6): 377-381. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000596.