基于BiblioShiny的先天性白内障可视化文献计量分析（2011─2020年）

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210525-00212

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (17)
Related Citation (8)

Download: PDF (11846 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

Guide

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the current status and developmental trends of global congenital cataract research

from 2011 to 2020 using the bibliometric method based on the Web of ScienceTM core collection database

and to provide reference information for further research. Methods: This article uses the BiblioShiny

program of scientific bibliometrics based on the R language to analyze the congenital cataract research

literature included in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) from 2011 to 2020, based on journals,

country and author distribution, keyword co-word analysis, co-citation analysis, collaboration network, etc.

The research knowledge base and research frontier hotspots of global congenital cataract were analyzed.

Results: ①A total of 1 492 studies were included. China and the United States had the largest number of

publications and were in the leading position. ②The publication volume of 《Molecular Vision》 journal

ranked first, with 74 published articles, followed by 《PLoS One》 with 66 published articles. Both are American journals. ③Dr. Scott R. Lambert from the Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University

School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California had the most publications. ④The knowledge base in the field

of congenital cataracts were congenital cataracts and gene mutations, and the current academic research

hotspot was the topic of gene expression. ⑤The direction of research can be divided into three major

clusters: The first cluster is the incidence of congenital cataract, risk factors, surgical treatment, etc. The

second cluster is mainly molecular genetics, gene mutations, etc. The third cluster is mainly focused on the

structure, stability and function of lens protein. Conclusions: In the field of congenital cataracts from 2011

to 2020, China and the United States are the countries with the largest number of publications. However,

the collaboration network between countries and institutions in the United States is much larger than that

of China. The current mainstream research directions can be divided into clinical treatment and gene and

protein levels.

Key words： congenital cataract bibliometric analysis BiblioShiny program

Received: 25 May 2021

PACS:

Fund: Wenzhou Basic Science and Technology Project (S20190032); Basic Medical and Health

Technology Project of Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau (Y20210033)

Corresponding Authors: Yingxuan Guo, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China (Email: gyx@mail.eye.ac.cn)

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Hengli Lian
	Xiangqing Ke
	Jinhai Huang
	et al

Cite this article:

Hengli Lian,Xiangqing Ke,Jinhai Huang等. A Visual Bibliometric Analysis of Congenital Cataract-Based on BiblioShiny (2011-2020)[J]. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2021, 23(12): 935-942.

URL:

https://www.cjoovs.com/EN/10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210525-00212 OR https://www.cjoovs.com/EN/Y2021/V23/I12/935

[1]	王凡. 先天性白内障三家系的致病基因研究. 河南: 郑州大学,2019: 1-59.
[2]	李昊, 潘宇光, 王磊. Bibliometrix: 一款新的基于R语言的文献计量软件介绍与评价. 大学图书情报学刊, 2018, 36(4): 93-104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1525.2018-04-018.
[3]	刁敬东, 佘杨杨, 农晓琳. 胜任力教育的文献计量学分析. 大众科技, 2019, 21(4): 115-119. DOI: CNKI:SUN:DZJI.0.2019-04-038.
[4]	李昊. 国际科研评价研究的科学计量及可视化分析——基于BiblioShiny程序. 图书情报导刊, 2018, 3(12): 36-44. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6033.2018.12.008.
[5]	钟源. 我国政府数据开放政策研究的文献计量分析. 高校图书情报论坛, 2018, l7(3): 50-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1069.2017.30.052.
[6]	Lachke SA, Ho JW, Kryukov GV, et al. iSyTE: integratedSystems Tool for Eye gene discovery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012, 53(3): 1617-1627. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8839.
[7]	Hejtmancik JF. Congenital cataracts and their moleculargenetics. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2008, 19(2): 134-149. DOI:10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.10.003.
[8]	Foster A, Gilbert C, Rahi J. Epidemiology of cataract inchildhood: a global perspective. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1997,23 Suppl 1: 601-604. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(97)80040-5.
[9]	Graw J. Genetics of crystallins: cataract and beyond. Exp EyeRes, 2009, 88(2): 173-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.10.011.
[10]	Zhao L, Chen XJ, Zhu J, et al. Lanosterol reverses proteinaggregation in cataracts. Nature, 2015, 523(7562): 607-611.DOI: 10.1038/nature14650.
[11]	Lambert SR, Lynn MJ, Hartmann EE, et al. Comparison ofcontact lens and intraocular lens correction of monocular aphakia during infancy: a randomized clinical trial of HOTV optotype acuity at age 4.5 years and clinical findings at age 5 years. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2014, 132(6): 676-682. DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.531.
[12]	Wu XH, Qian KW, Xu GZ, et al. The Role of Retinal Dopaminein C57BL/6 Mouse Refractive Development as Revealed by Intravitreal Administration of 6-Hydroxydopamine. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2016, 57(13): 5393-5404. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.16-19543.
[13]	Gillespie RL, O'Sullivan J, Ashworth J, et al. Personalizeddiagnosis and management of congenital cataract by nextgeneration sequencing. Ophthalmology, 2014, 121(11): 2124-2137.e1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.06.006.
[14]	Chen J, Ma Z, Jiao X, et al. Mutations in FYCO1 causeautosomal-recessive congenital cataracts. Am J Hum Genet,2011, 88(6): 827-838. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.008.
[15]	Freedman SF, Lynn MJ, Beck AD, et al. Glaucoma-Related Adverse Events in the First 5 Years After Unilateral Cataract Removal in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study.JAMA Ophthalmol, 2015, 133(8): 907-914. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1329.
[16]	郭迎暄, 孙勇, 符爱存, 等. 基于Web of Science文献计量的角膜塑形镜研究态势分析. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2020, 22(3): 204-210. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20190201-00030.
[17]	Bennett J,Wellman J, Marshall KA, et al. Safety and durabilityof effect of contralateral-eye administration of AAV2 gene therapy in patients with childhood-onset blindness caused by RPE65 mutations: a follow-on phase 1 trial. Lancet, 2016,388(10045): 661-672. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30371-3.