Comparing the Clinical Application Outcomes between the NGENUITY Three-Dimensional and Binocular Microscope Visualization Systems in Posterior Chamber Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation
Comparing the Clinical Application Outcomes between the NGENUITY Three-Dimensional and Binocular Microscope Visualization Systems in Posterior Chamber Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation
. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2022, 24(2): 110-115. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210824-00335
Li K, Wang Z, Zhang D, et al. Visual outcomes and corneal biomechanics after V4c implantable collamer lens implantation in subclinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2020,46(10): 1339-1345. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000262.
[3]
Berquet F, Henry A, Barbe C, et al. Comparing heads-up versus binocular microscope visualization systems in anterior and
Nariai Y, Horiguchi M, Mizuguchi T, et al. Comparison of microscopic illumination between a three-dimensional headsup system and eyepiece in cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol,2021, 31(4): 1817-1821. DOI: 10.1177/1120672120929962.
[5]
Palácios RM, de Carvalho ACM, Maia M, et al. An experimental and clinical study on the initial experiences of Brazilian vitreoretinal surgeons with heads-up surgery. Graefes Arch ClinExp Ophthalmol, 2019, 257(3): 473-483. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04246-w.
[6]
Agranat JS, Miller JB, Douglas VD, et al. The scope of threedimensional digital visualization systems in vitreoretinal surgery. Clin Ophthalmol, 2019(13): 2093-2096. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S213834.
[7]
Asani B, Siedlecki J, Schworm B, et al. 3D heads-up display vs.standard operating microscope vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous
Eckardt C, Paulo E. Heads-up surgery for vitreoretinal procedures: an experimental and clinical study. Retina, 2016,36(1): 137-147. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000689.
[9]
Postel Eric A. Long-term Follow-up of Iatrogenic Phototoxicity. Arch Ophthalmol, 1998, 116(6): 753-757. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.116.6.753.
[10]
Liu J, Wu D, Ren X, et al. Clinical experience of using the NGENUITY three-dimensional surgery system in ophthalmic surgical procedures. Acta Ophthalmol, 2020, 99(1): e101-e108.DOI: 10.1111 /aos.14518.
[11]
Shaaban Y, Badran T. Three-year effect of phakic intraocular lenses on the corneal endothelial cell density. Clin Ophthalmol,2020, 14(1): 149-155. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S236041.
Shin JY, Ahn H, Seo KY, et al . Comparison of higher order aberrations after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided LASEK in high myopia. J Refract Surg, 2012,28(2): 106-111. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20111018-02.
[15]
Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shimizu K, et al. Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia. Am J Ophthalmol, 2012, 153(6): 1178-1186.DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.12.005.
[16]
Rez-vives CP, Dominguez-Vicent A, Ferrer-Blasco T, et al.Optical quality of hyperopic and myopic phakic intraocular lenses. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2014, 62(4): 437-441. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.119423.
[17]
Kayhan B. The effects of implantable collamer lens implantation on higher order aberrations. Int J Ophthalmol, 2019, 12(12):1848-1852. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2019.12.05.
[18]
Siedlecki J, Schmelter V, Mayer WJ, et al. SMILE versus implantable collamer lens implantation for high myopia: a matched comparative study. J Refract Surg, 2020, 36(3): 150-159. DOI: 10.3928 /1081597X-20200210-02.
[19]
Siedlecki j, Schmelter V, Schworm B, et al. Corneal wavefront aberrations and subjective quality of vision after small incision lenticule extraction. Acta ophthalmologica, 2020, 98(7):e907-e913. DOI: 10. 1111/aos.14420.
[20]
Sun WK, Yang H, Yoon G, et al. Higher-order aberration changes after implantable collamer lens implantation for myopia. Am J Ophthalmol, 2011, 151(4): 653-662. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.10.031