改良式多焦软性角膜接触镜矫正老视的视觉效果
陈敏锋 林川 吴文凤 夏瑞静 毛欣杰 瞿佳
温州医科大学附属眼视光医院,温州 325027
Analyzed the Visual Effect of an Improved Multifocal Contact Lens to Correct Presbyopia
Minfeng Chen, Chuan Lin, Wenfeng Wu, Ruijing Xia, Xinjie Mao, Jia Qu
Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
文章导读
摘要 目的:探讨改良式多焦点软性角膜接触镜(多焦软镜)和单光软性角膜接触镜(单焦软镜)联合验配方式矫正老视的视觉效果。方法:前瞻性研究。于2018 年1—12 月在温州医科大学附属眼视光医院招募20例老视观察对象(老视度数+1.00~+2.00 D),分别按多焦法(双眼配戴多焦软镜)、单眼视法(一眼配戴远用单焦软镜,一眼配戴近用单焦软镜)和改良法(主视眼配戴单焦软镜,非主视眼配戴多焦软镜)3种方法验配角膜接触镜。每种方法配戴1周,间隔1周作为洗脱期,分析选用单光框架眼镜和3种接触镜矫正方法矫正下的观察对象双眼远、中、近距离100%及10%的双眼对比度视力(后文中视力均为双眼视力),同时采用VFQ-25汉化版视觉质量量表评估视觉效果。通过单因素方差分析不同方法下视力的差异。结果:在远距视力对比中,多焦法视力低于单光框架眼镜(t=3.91,P=0.001)和改良法(t=2.94,P=0.008)。在50 cm处100%和10%对比度时,多焦法(100%:t=-4.76,P<0.001;10%:t=-4.22,P<0.001)、单眼视法(100%:t =-3.50,P=0.002;10%:t=-4.76,P<0.001)和改良法视力(100%:t=-4.22,P<0.001;10%:t=-3.90,P=0.001)均高于单光框架眼镜;在30 cm处100%和10%对比度时,多焦法(100%:t=-4.36,P<0.001;10%:t=-5.48,P<0.001)、单眼视法(100%:t =-7.43,P<0.001;10%:t =-4.03,P=0.001)和改良法(100%:t =-5.67,P<0.001;10%:t=-3.93,P=0.001)视力均高于单光框架眼镜。所有观察对象中有1 例认为单光框架眼镜最佳,7 例认为多焦法最佳,2 例认为单眼视法最佳,10 例认为改良法最佳。结论:联合多焦法和单眼视法的改良验配方法能很好地矫正老视,提供不弱于单眼视法和多焦法的视觉效果,更容易被老视患者接受。
关键词 :
老视 ,
角膜接触镜 ,
视觉质量
Abstract :Objective: To analyze the visual effect of an improved multifocal contact lens fitting method to correct
presbyopia. Methods: A prospective analysis was performed on 20 presbyopia participants (Add: +1.00 D-
+2.00 D) who met the criteria from January to December 2018 in Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical
University. Three methods for them to correct presbyopia, included multifocal method (both eyes wearing
multifocal soft lens), single visual method (one eye wearing single visual soft lens for distance, one eye
wearing single visual soft lens for near) and improved multifocal method (single visual soft lens for the
dominant eye, multifocal soft lens for the non-dominant eye). Each correction method would be used for
1 week and there would be 1 week between each method to stop wearing the lens as the washout period.
Analyzed the binocular correct vision of these 20 participants among these 3 correct methods, and use
VFQ-25 Chinese version of the visual quality table to evaluate the visual effect for these 3 correct methods.
ANOVA was used to analysis the difference of binocular correct vision among these correct methods.
Results: The binocular correct vision of multifocal method was statistical lower than the single visual
spectacle (t=3.91, P=0.001) and improved multifocal method (t=2.94, P=0.008) of distance correct vision.
Different contrast of binocular correct vision at 50 cm of these three 3 correct methods were all higher
than single visual spectacle, included the same binocular correct of multifocal method (100%: t=-4.76,
P<0.001; 10%: t=-4.22, P<0.001), improved multifocal method (100%: t=-4.22, P<0.001; 10%:
t=-3.90, P=0.001) and single visual method (100%: t=-3.50, P=0.002; 10%: t=-4.76, P<0.001). And
different contrast of binocular correct vision at 30 cm of these three 3 correct methods were also higher than
single visual spectacle, included the same binocular correct of multifocal method (100%: t=-4.36, P<0.001;
10%: t=-5.48, P<0.001), improved multifocal method (100%: t=-5.67, P<0.001; 10%: t=-3.93, P=0.001)
and single visual method (100%: t=-7.43, P<0.001; 10%; t=-4.03, P=0.001). In all subjects there were 1
subject considered the single visual spectacle was the best, 7 participants felt the multifocal method was
the best, 2 subjects chose single visual method and 10 participants liked the improved multifocal method.
Conclusion: The improved multifocal method which combined multifocal method and single visual method
could achieve a good presbyopia correction effect, the binocular vision and visual quality of multifocal
method was not weak of other two methods, and this method was easier to be accepted by participants.
Key words :
presbyopia
contact lens
visual quality
收稿日期: 2021-05-14
基金资助:
通讯作者:
瞿佳(ORCID:0000-0003-1678-966X),Email:13806898805@163.com
引用本文:
陈敏锋, 林川, 吴文凤, 等.. 改良式多焦软性角膜接触镜矫正老视的视觉效果[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2022, 24(2): 137-142.
Minfeng Chen, Chuan Lin, Wenfeng Wu, et al. Analyzed the Visual Effect of an Improved Multifocal Contact Lens to Correct Presbyopia. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual science, 2022, 24(2): 137-142. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210514-00195
链接本文:
https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210514-00195 或 https://www.cjoovs.com/CN/Y2022/V24/I2/137
1]
穆光宗. 人口老龄化国情教育意义重大. 中国社会工作,2018(8): 28.
[2]
Khaw KT. Epidemiological aspects of ageing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 1997, 352(1363): 1829-1835. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0168.
[3]
陈旭, 朱志忠. 老视理论及治疗进展. 国际眼科杂志, 2002(1):14-20. DOI: CNKI:SUN:GJYK.0.2002-01-002.
[4]
Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Presbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2019, 68: 124-143.DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004.
[5]
王文惠, 巫雷, 樊映川, 等. 比较两种人工晶状体矫正老视效果的临床研究. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) 2020, 10(5): 294-299. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2020.05.007.
[6]
Regan D, Neima D. Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. Ophthalmology, 1983, 90(10): 1192-1200. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(83)34407-9.
[7]
赵云娥, 毛崇溶, 王勤美, 等. 早期白内障患者对比敏感度测定及手术时机研究. 眼视光学杂志, 2002, 4(3): 132-133. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2002.03.002.
[8]
林丹丹, 孙艳丽, 吕帆, 等. 近视儿童在低对比度状态下视敏度的表达. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2012, 14(6): 347-351. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2012.06.007.
[9]
乐融融, 保金华, 任凤英, 等. 正视和近视青少年对比度视力与像差的关系. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2011, 13(5):346-349. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2011.05.006.
[10]
褚仁远, 张小广. 飞行员招生体检中亮背景下不同对比度视力和反应时间的研究. 眼视光学杂志, 2009, 11(4): 282-284.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2009.04.012.
[11]
邹湖涌, 刘志平, 沙翔垠, 等. 两对比度对数视力表在临床中的应用. 中国医药科学, 2017, 7(14): 7-10. DOI: CNKI: SUN:GYKX.0.2017-14-004.
[12]
闫冉, 邓葵兴, 陈伟坤, 等. 简易近用对比度视力表的设计和临床应用. 临床医学工程, 2016, 23(2): 129-130. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2016.02.0129.
[13]
Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR. et al. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119(7): 1050-1058. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050.
[14]
Wang CW, Chan CL, Jin HY. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Optom Vis Sci, 2008, 85(11): 1091-1099. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818b9f23.
[15]
元力, 万博, 鲍永珍. 近视眼人群屈光状态与主视眼的相关性研究. 中华眼科杂志, 2020, 56(9): 693-698. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200206-00050
[16]
博士伦专业事务部. 渐进多焦点接触镜的验配与应用. 中国眼镜科技杂志, 2017(11): 102-103.
[17]
Rueff EM, Varghese RJ, Brack TM. et al. A survey of presbyopic contact lens wearers in a university setting. Optom Vis Sci,2016, 93(8): 848-854. DOI: 10.1097/OPX. 0000000000000881.
[18]
Sha J, Bakaraju RC, Tilia D, et al. Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia.Arq Bras Oftalmol, 2016, 79(2): 73-77. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20160023.
[19]
王瑞卿, 赵海岚. 单眼视角膜接触镜矫正老视对视功能的影响. 国际眼科杂志, 2005, 5(1): 139-141. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5123.2005.01.034.
[20]
买志彬, 何国利, 唐秀侠, 等. 单眼视法配戴角膜接触镜矫治老视对立体视功能的影响. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2018, 36(5):386-389. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2018.05.012.
[21]
Sanders E, Wagner H, Reich LN. Visual acuity and “balanced progressive” simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.Eye Contact Lens, 2008, 34(5): 293-296. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318185d271.
[22]
Vasudevan B, Flores M, Gaib S. Objective and subjective visual performance of multifocal contact lenses: pilot study.Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2014, 37(3): 168-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2013.09.013.
[1]
田乐, 李德卫, 彭予苏, 等. 角膜屈光术前睑板腺形态的影响因素 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2023, 25(8): 589-595.
[2]
丁雯芝, 张金燕, 蒋冬冬, 等. 基于微信平台的管理模式在青少年配戴角膜塑形镜后的随访应用 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2023, 25(6): 432-437.
[3]
中华医学会眼科学分会眼视光学组,中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼视光专业委员会,中国老年医学学会眼科学分会,等. 硬性透气性角膜接触镜试戴片临床使用管理专家共识 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2023, 25(6): 408-412.
[4]
刘珠珠, 魏瑞华. 周边离焦软性角膜接触镜对儿童青少年近视控制效果的研究进展 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2023, 25(5): 391-395.
[5]
刘艳, 陈国富, 蒋益, 等. 周边离焦软性角膜接触镜在近视矫治中的光学质量及对比敏感度视力分析 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2023, 25(4): 252-256.
[6]
张静, 王晓川, 万磊, 等. 中国北方原发性圆锥角膜人口统计学特征及治疗结果 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2023, 25(3): 219-225.
[7]
中国眼谷& moody角膜接触镜技术创新研究院. 彩色角膜接触镜规范验配白皮书 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2022, 24(7): 481-484.
[8]
林颖, 苏焕钧, 张霞, 等.. 不同瞳孔参数对于Q值调整FS-LASIK的影响 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2022, 24(6): 423-428.
[9]
何唯, 常鲁, 赵卿荧, 等.. Kappa角对高度近视白内障患者行区域折射MIOL植入术后视觉质量的影响 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2022, 24(5): 358-363.
[10]
陈霞, 刘伟民, 林泉, 等.. 多区正向光学离焦镜片对近视儿童视觉质量的影响 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2022, 24(4): 255-262.
[11]
可殊瑞,李灿. 三种人工晶状体植入术后静态视力和动态视力的评估及比较 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2022, 24(12): 938-944.
[12]
林琳, 冯云, 傅瑶, 等. 眼表微环境与泪膜稳态对视觉质量影响的新认识 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2022, 24(12): 881-887.
[13]
郑燕,翟长斌,付彩云,等. FS-LASIK联合快速角膜交联术后早期视觉质量 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2022, 24(10): 736-.
[14]
刘建东, 刘航宇,朱方兴, 等. 两种单焦点人工晶状体经睫状体平坦部巩膜缝线固定术后视觉质量的比较 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2022, 24(10): 773-.
[15]
潘一果 保金华 李雪 黄莹莹 陈浩. 多焦软性角膜接触镜对周边屈光度及周边角膜屈光力的影响 [J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2021, 23(9): 662-668.