In recent years, corneal refractive surgery developed rapidly in our country. The surgery′s safety and validity are paid a lot of attention by both doctors and patients. With the progress of theory and technology, the safety of corneal refractive surgery is generally guaranteed. Therefore, the quality of surgery becomes an increasing concern, which makes the improvement of visual quality an essential indicator for corneal refractive surgery assessment. This article describes the significance and methods of the visual quality assessment, as well as ideas for the insurance of visual quality after surgery. It is expected to promote the recognition of visual quality assessment with corneal refractive surgery.
王勤美,黄锦海. 深化对角膜屈光手术视觉质量重要性的认识[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2014, 16(1): 1-4.
Wang Qinmei,Huang Jinhai. Further understanding of the importance of quality of vision in corneal refractive surgery. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2014, 16(1): 1-4. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2014.01.001
Lombardo M, Lombardo G. Wave aberration of human eyes and new descriptors of image optical quality and visual performance[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2010,36:313-331.
[2]
Vilaseca M, Arjona M, Pujol J, et al. Optical quality of foldable monofocal intraocular lenses before and after injection: comparative evaluation using a double-pass system[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2009,35:1415-1423.
[3]
Martinez-Roda JA, Vilaseca M, Ondategui JC, et al. Optical quality and intraocular scattering in a healthy young population[J]. Clin Exp Optom,2011,94:223-229.
[4]
Yamaguchi T, Negishi K, Tsubota K. Functional visual acuity measurement in cataract and intraocular lens implantation[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol,2011,22:31-36.
[5]
van den Berg TJ, Franssen L, Coppens JE. Straylight in the human eye: testing objectivity and optical character of the psychophysical measurement[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,2009, 29:345-350.
[6]
Wang L, Shirayama M, Koch DD. Repeatability of corneal power and wavefront aberration measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug Placido corneal topographer[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2010, 36:425-430.
[7]
Ondategui JC, Vilaseca M, Arjona M, et al. Optical quality after myopic photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison using a double-pass system[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2012,38:16-27.
[8]
Lee K, Ahn JM, Kim EK, et al. Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2013,251:2163-2169.
Keir NJ, Simpson T, Jones LW, et al. Wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia: effect on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher order aberrations[J]. J Refract Surg,2009,25:524-533.
[11]
Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) questionnaire: development and validation[J]. Optom Vis Sci,2004,81:769-777.
[12]
Hays RD, Mangione CM, Ellwein L, et al. Psychometric properties of the National eye institute-refractive error quality of life instrument[J]. Ophthalmology,2003,110:2292-2301.
Park CY, Oh SY, Chuck RS. Measurement of angle kappa and centration in refractive surgery[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol,2012, 23:269-275.
[17]
Soler V, Benito A, Soler P, et al. A randomized comparison of pupil-centered versus vertex-centered ablation in LASIK correction of hyperopia[J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2011,152:591-599 e592.