Objective To compare the difference and accuracy of the two methods of calculation for the Q-value of corneal anterior surface that with tangential radius or sagittal radius. Methods Twenty-four aspheric test objects were manufactured with the Moore diamond turning lathe in this self-controlled study. The test objects were all verified by the TalySurf roughness profiler and the asphericity (Q) and vertex radius of curvature (r0) were fitted. Then, they were examined with the Orbscan Ⅱ corneal topography. The results were applied paired t-test and Bland-Altman figure to perform statistical analysis. Results ①The average r0-values of the horizontal semi-meridian calculated by the sagittal radius and the tangential radius were 7.72±0.09 mm, 7.73±0.09 mm. Both of them were close to but have statistical differences with the fitted value 7.70±0.08 mm. ②There was no statistical differences between Q-values of the horizontal semi-meridian calculated by the sagittal radius and the tangential radius and fitted value (sagittal refractive map: t=1.61, P>0.05; tangent refractive map: t=-0.87, P>0.05). ③The average differences between the Q-values of the horizontal semi-meridian calculated by the tangential radius and fetted values was more close to 0 than sagittal ones, and the 95% consistency limits of upper and lower range was smaller than sagittal ones. Conclusion Although the Q-values of corneal anterior surface calculated by tangential radius and sagittal radius are both reliable, the former is more accurate and stable.
Objective To evaluate the effects of angle kappa on the visual quality of multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs). Methods This was a prospective observational study. Forty-seven eyes of 47 patients who underwent cataract phacoemulsification and MIOL implantation in our department were enrolled in the study. The patients were between 46 and 81 years old. All patients were divided into two groups according to their kappa angle size. There were 24 eyes in group A (0<r≤0.17 mm) and twenty-three eyes in group B (0.17 mm<r≤0.40 mm). The follow-up period was 3 months after surgery, and uncorrected distance visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity and near visual acuity were evaluated. All patients were assessed for modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff, Strehl ratio and contrast sensitivity. The occurrence of adverse visual symptoms and spectacle independence were also recorded. The data were analyzed with an independent t test or χ2 test. Results There was a statistically significant difference between group A and group B in the occurrence of halo (χ2=4.997, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in uncorrected visual acuity, MTF cutoff, Strehl ratio or the occurrence of glare between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The angle kappa may have little effect on the visual qualities of MIOLs. However, the angle kappa may be related to adverse visual symptoms.